NotUrsula
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2002
- Messages
- 20,103
Nope, nope, nope. I only had to WFH for two weeks at the beginning, when I was in quarantine. It was only bearable because it was so short-term but no way was I fully productive. Neither was any of my staff.
My department has two types of jobs - field and administrative. Of course the field tasks have to be done in person and the admin work relies heavily on paper files/records and the office equipment and proprietary software employees don't have at home. Staff working remotely required somebody being their "hands and feet" in the office which was an unfair burden on whomever had to do it. As the department manager, after a few very unsatisfactory experiments with staff working from home, I declined all further requests. Anybody who wasn't in officially mandated quarantine had to come to the office.
With all due respect, it sounds like part of the reason why WFH didn't work for your company was that the company did not properly leverage technology to enable it. The barriers you noted for administrative work all can be overcome by investment in equipment and training, if the desire to support it is really there. It's not cheap, but it can work much better than it seems it did for you all.
Nope, nope, nope. I only had to WFH for two weeks at the beginning, when I was in quarantine. It was only bearable because it was so short-term but no way was I fully productive. Neither was any of my staff.
Granted not every job calls for it, but try working off a 15-page set of blueprints when viewed on your smart phone. 

Also, I can get more of my own work done because I do not have to do tasks to cover for people who called in. I cannot do stuff like run checks or pull car titles from home (which is not my job), but when I am in the office I end up doing that because the people who are supposed to do that call in. When I am at home, I can focus on my own work.