Since I have decided to take this non-photograpy photography class I thought I would share the horror, I mean what I've learned.
To begin the study of photography, we will take a look into the history of photography and the ways in which the camera has affected how we see and what we see.
The makings for photography as we know it began centuries ago with the development of the camera obscura or dark chamber. When light enters a darkened room through a small hole in the wall, an inverted image is formed on the opposite wall. During the Renaissance, artists used the camera obscura as a device to help them sketch their paintings. It was not until the 19th century, however, that the chemistry needed to "fix" that image on paper, film, or another surface was discovered. Daguerre "fixed" the image on a metal plate called a daguerreotype and Talbot "fixed" the image on paper called a calotype.
Imagine the first time a family had their picture taken! Miniature painters were quickly put out of business when the daguerreotype studios opened. Customers loved the "mirror" images of the daguerreotypes. They were less enthralled by the calotypes, which were grainy and less clear. Daguerre's discovery was made public in 1839 and sweep through countries in Europe and aboard.
And now, a little help with my homework please. I beg you. I will dance for answers.
Photography was the "invented" in mid-19th century in Europe in a scientific, artistic, cultural, and economic climate ready to support the new industry. Niepce, Bayard, Daguerre, and Talbot are credited with making the first photographic images. What were their contributions to photography? How did their techniques differ? What was the public's reaction? Using specific examples from the text or websites give an example of an early photograph that aroused your curiosity. Discuss the magnetism of this picture. Is it the technique, the subject matter, or the point of view of the photographer?