Random Thread & The Continuation of Necessary Continuation

Status
Not open for further replies.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q52xvody08I
Ben Rector makes my heart melt.
I just bought his 1st CD which I didn't even know existed until now!
I need his Christmas album because it's so ridiculously amazing.
Best artists I've ever listened to, ever. Better than Gaga, better than Buble, better than any other artist, ever.
Maybe it's because his type of music is my favorite.
 
I'm bored. I think I'm gonna go skate. See you guys later!
 
AFTER A GUILTY VERDICT

Probation. Mair & May. Investigation of the Experiences of Offenders on Probation Orders.
Cross sectional study.
Survey using a questionnaire that was piloted initially with seven offices and 24 offenders, then improved before being given the final sample.
Random sample.
A total of 3,299 offenders from 22 probation offices across England & Wales.
40% failed to take part for various reasons, with more failing to turn up for appointments in the London area.
Interviews were conducted by independently employed researchers visiting the selected offices and covered a vast range of questions about the offender's life as well as their likelihood of re-offending.
Many questions were Likert-scale responses. Otherwise, they were all closed questions.
An average of 88% felt probabtion was extremely or very useful.
Over 60% of the sample felt that the probation officer would help them to sort out problems and was there to talk to, but only 37% felt this would stop them re-offending altogether.
Having someone independent to talk to seems to be the most useful function of the probation officer and the topics discussed included things to do, problems with money and employment.
Probation is seen in a postive light by offenders, albeit those who failed to turn up to all the the appointments were excluded from the study, and might of had more negative opinions.
Those on probation tend to be unemployed, on benefits, poorly qualified and in poor health.
Nature or nurture.
Mainly individual explanation side of debate.
Mainly reductionism side of debate.
Mainly free will side of debate.
Mainly quantitative data.
Restorative Justice. Sherman & Strang. Review of Restorative Justice and its Effectiveness in Preventing Re-offending.
Opportunity sample.
An internet search including the words 'restorative justice' with 're-offending' or 'recidivism' or 'mediation' was applied to many databases of abstracts and acedemic periodicals worldwide. This yielded 424 hits.
Two researchers analysed the content of all the research found where a sample of offenders on an RJ programme was compared with a similar sample who did not experience RJ.
It is the Home Office's way of assessing re-conviction rates to arrive at what they call 'reasonabl unbiased' results. This yielded 36 studies, which form the basis of the analysis.
Reductions in re-offending were found for violence and property crime but RJ does not work in all cases.
It is more effective for cases when violence has been part of the crime.
From the victim's viewpoint, it can improve their mental health by reducing post-traumatic shock symptoms and helping to come to terms with what has happened.
There is strong evidence that RJ is effective in some cases and support for its increased use, perhaps beginning with young offenders.
Nurture side of debate.
Mainly individual explanation side of debate.
Mainly reductionism side of debate.
Determinism or free will.
Mainly qualititative data.

Looking Deathworthy. Eberhardt et al. Investigation of the Relation Between Stereotypically Black Features in Offenders and the Likelihood of Recieving the Death Penalty.
Laboratory experiment.
Self-selected sample.
51 raters from Stanford University (32 white, 15 Asian and 4 of other ethnicities)
Analysis of the database of death-eligible cases in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania that advanced to penalty phase between 1979 and 1999. In 44 cases, a black man murdered a white victim. Their photographs were shown to naive raters who were asked to use their facial features to give them a rating of stereotypicality from 1 to 11. They watched the black & white pictures for 4 seconds each.
An analysis of covariance was carried out which allowed the researchers to input many different variables to test for their effects on sentencing decisions such as aggravating circumstances and severity of the murder.
Final analysis shows that out of all the variables, the most significant was that of the most stereotypically black defendants were 57.5% more likely to recieve the death penalty than the less stereotypically black at 24.4%
In a second study where there was a black defendant and a black victim, the same analysis produced no significant effect, suggesting that a black victim is seen as less important.
It is possible that the jurors see the race of the defendant as a blameworthy factor in the trial. This could be explained by the intergroup conflict in the case of a black defendant/white victim. and interpersonal conflict when both the defendant and victim are black.
Black physical traits are associated with criminality and in this case, it appears that they influence sentencing decisions.
Nurture side of debate.
Individual and situational explation.
Reductionism and holism.
Determinism or free will.
Mainly qualitative data.
 

/
Treatment Programmes. Cann. Impact of Cognitive Skills Program in Reducing Re-conviction.
To find out if cognitive skills programmes were effective in terms of lower re-offending rates for a sample of women prisoners.
180 offenders who started enhanced thinking skills (ETS) or reasoning & rehabilitation (R&R) between 1996-2000, including 14 non-completers. The comaprison group comprised 540 female offenders who did not participate in either programme.
All offenders were discharged in 1996-2000 and spent at least a year in the community following a custodial sentence of 6 months or more.
Expected 2-year re-conviction rates were calculated for all the women who were matched by whether they were at high, medium or low risk of re-conviction.
Actual re-conviction rates were calculated for 1 and 2 years after release.
Each individual programme was assessed for effectiveness.
No significant difference was found between the treated group and the comparison group on expected re-conviction or actual re-conviction.
No significant difference found for ETS but the R&R treated group did worse and were more significantly likely to re-offend.
The programmes worked for male offenders, and could be why the females didn't do well.
Women offend for different reasons from men and while they may have cognitive skills deficits, these are not necessarily criminal in nature.
Women offend due to drug abuse, relationship problems, emotional factors and severe financial hardship.
The programmes were inappropriate for the women's needs, having been developed for men and with men's risk factors in mind.
The programmes were not delivered consistently in the women's prisons and were limited in length, not meeting the standards in the description above.
Mainly nature side of debate.
Mainly individual explanation of debate.
Reductionism and holism.
Mainly determinism side of debate.
Mainly quantitative data.

Anger Management. Ireland. Investigation of Whether Anger Management Courses Work.
50 prisoners who had completed an anger management course and a control group of 37 prisoners who had been assessed as suitable for such a course, but not actually completed one.
Matched-pairs design.
They were matched on their responses to a cognitive behavioural interview, the Wing Behavioural Checklist (WBC) and a self report on anger management.
A quasi-experiment taking advantage of the two naturally occuring groups.
The measures were given before and after they did the programme, and those in the control group did the same, but without an intervention inbetween.
There was a significant reduction in prison wing-based aggression in the experimental group.
The experimental group scored lower on the self-report measures after completing the course, and there was no difference in the control group.
92% of prisoners in the experiment group showed improvement on one measure, 48% on two measures and 8% showed deterioration in both measures.
In short term, these prisoners have been helped by the programme, but there is no re-conviction data for the long term. There should be further investigation into the 8% that did worse.
Nature and nurture.
Individual and situational explanations.
Mainly reductionism side of debate.
Determinism and free will.
Mainly quantitative data.

Ear Acupuncture for Drug Rehabiliation. Wheatley. Use of Acupuncture to Treat Drug Addiction in Prisoners.
Opportunity sample.
350 prisoners in 6 high-security prisons who recieved acupuncture and the standard care programme, FOCUS.
A control group has the FOCUS programme, but no acupuncture.
Two trained professionals worked with groups of 10-15 prisoners in a relaxed setting. Needles were inserted into the five acupuncture points in the ear and prisoners relaxed for a 40-minute period. They then returned to their normal duties.
Prisoners reported better sleep, improved relaxation, reduced cravings for nicotine, and health improvements.
They made more effort to communicate with their families and attend classes.
Staff commented that they could tell when prisoners had been to acupuncture because the wing was calmer and there was less demand for healthcare services.
70% reduction in drug-related incidences from 6 months pre- to 6 months post-treatment.
41% reduction in serious incident reports.
42% reduction in positive drug testing results that are mandatory.
33% reduction in positive drug testing results that are voluntary.
Wheatley feels there is enough evidence to expand the delivery throughout the prison systems and believes that acupuncture works as a complimentary therapy with other programmes.
Nature and nurture.
Mainly situational explanation side of debate.
Reductionism and holism.
Determinism and free will.
Qualitative and quantitative data.

I'm really tempted to skip one of the chapters, but I can't... I'll do it last because I hate the topic.
 
No-one ever suspects me of liking Katy Perry. Probably because she's really famous or something, idk. But they're always like "omg you like Katy Perry?!" and I'm like pfft she's up there with TAI and Cobra. I have like 50 songs by her or something on my mp4 player, a KP shirt and she's the person to feature most on my wall. xD
 
Why did we have to take the educational part of Pschology? It's filled up with theories. I hate them! Studies are much easier to remember.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.













Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top Bottom