sandramaac
<font color=blue>Needs to look harder...<br><font
- Joined
- May 12, 2001
- Messages
- 1,313
http://news.aol.com/story/_a/dna-cl...09990001?icid=200100397x1205492071x1200255666
honestly, I don't believe this
perhaps the underwear was a new pair (being xmas morning I know my kids had on new stuff--i.e. jammies, unide's etc) from the package, and the fingerprints were those of the seamstress who made them, or someone who folded or handled then during packaging process or they were bought new and loose in a bin and were touched by the checkout person come one investigators can't be that dumb
they say 'it's the same DNA' found on other parts of her clothing don't believe it this story about this child's death has been spun for years didn't realize Ramsey was that ricch to keep so many on the pay roll they know what happened and someday it will come to light---just like OJ
honestly, I don't believe this
perhaps the underwear was a new pair (being xmas morning I know my kids had on new stuff--i.e. jammies, unide's etc) from the package, and the fingerprints were those of the seamstress who made them, or someone who folded or handled then during packaging process or they were bought new and loose in a bin and were touched by the checkout person come one investigators can't be that dumb
they say 'it's the same DNA' found on other parts of her clothing don't believe it this story about this child's death has been spun for years didn't realize Ramsey was that ricch to keep so many on the pay roll they know what happened and someday it will come to light---just like OJ

Maybe they can have a little respect now.