Originally posted by Luvinit
"they" must really know what they are talking about!!!
Yes, I used to always think "they" knew what they were talking about. Seems like everything I read made sense and I prescribed to their way of thinking. But "they" have changed their mind too many times.....
5 years ago you had to avoid eggs at all costs because they were SO terribly bad for you. Now they encourage you to eat a few eggs a week because they are good for you. (and the Atkins people, my goodness--if eggs were that terrible for you, they'd all be dead!)
I remember when my dad first had heart trouble....we switched from butter to margarine because butter would slowly clog your arteries and kill you. NOW they are coming out with the information that the ??transfattyacids (or poly unsaturateds or whatever it is) in margarine is actually BAD for you and should be avoided at all costs!
So if you try to keep up with all of their proposed research (often times limited sample sizes with skewed results and not accounting for other factors) you will go crazy changing your diet every 3 months as new "research" comes out that tells you what you are doing is wrong.
This isn't a food related study, but let me show you how researchers can twist the info in their studies and reports to "scare" people.....
About 3 years ago they came out with a study that looked at thousands of families with small babies. What they "found" is that *babies who had nightlights in their rooms all night were MORE LIKELY (by a wide margin) to develop near sightedness as they grew up*
YIKES! Sounds awful. It was in all the parenting magazines about how we should yank those nightlights from our precious babies rooms.
But, what the researchers FAILED to mention, or account for, was that near sightedness is genetic. Did they stop and think for a moment??? MAYBE those near sighted PARENTS used a night light in the babies rooms at night because when the parents went to check on the baby they could do so without turning on an overhead light!!! The night light gave these near sighted parents just enough light to check on the sleeping baby (or care for the baby that was up at night to eat) YES, the babies, as they grew, became near sighted. Hmmmmmmm.
Was it caused by a night light? Or would it have happened anyway because they had the genetic pre-disposition for it?
So they took research, found ONE thing they were trying to find, and found it. But didn't account for the other factors.
BE VERY CRITICAL OF RESEARCH! It's usually skewed in favor of whoever is doing it or whoever is funding it. Sad, but true.
My point is....if you want to drink 200 oz of water a day and spend your life in the bathroom because that is what research says to do, then do it, but I choose to listen to the God given cues in my body to tell me what my body needs. Sometimes that's fat, sometimes carbs, sometimes a big old scoop of high fat ice cream on a sugar cone. Sometimes I want a nice cold glass of water, sometimes a coke.
If you're up for some more interesting research, check out the completely flawwed study about how breastfeeding prevents ear infections!! Of course they don't take into account the fact that most women who breastfeed are middle to upper class and stay home with their babies....therefore the children are not exposed to the viruses that can cause ear infections in their day cares all day, plus these women are less likely to smoke (smoking decreases the motility of the cilia in the eustacian tube leading to the ear--therefore allowing more germs up into the middle ear) etc etc etc. Case in point....I only breastfeed my daughter for 3 months, then went back to work. She went to day care. She had one ear infection growing up. I breastfed my son for 9 months, he hardly ever left my side and never went to day care. He had a perforated ear drum from an ear infection at 6 weeks. He only had TWO ear infections between 6 weeks and 13 months---one lasted 5 months, the second lasted 7 months (trying multiple antibiotics each time with no improvement) He got ear tubes at 13 months.
So in this case....the baby exposed to more viruses and formula fed had one ear infection. The baby breastfed and "isolated" had 12 months worth. So much for their scientific research!
Off my soapbox and donning my flame retardant suit!