Massachusetts
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- May 22, 2018
- Messages
- 197
I am excited to watch the launch of this Tower. This will be our greatest insight as to how restrictions impact demand.
By keeping it part of the same association they sell it for normal price for only 41 years instead of 50. I feel like that is the appeal on Disney’s end. It also makes the shared amenities easier. I don’t think the decision was around pros and cons of restrictions at all for themIsn't that the argument for Island Tower though? Could have forced those that want to stay there to buy there but didn't. Renewing or even just reselling BCV, BWV, etc. will be a lot cheaper then building a brand new resort like Island Tower... I would think at least.
No, BCV and BWV rebuilds will be very different than the Island tower. Polynesian is still a fairly "young" DVC association with a long expiration (2066? I think offhand). They have a bunch of Polynesian owners already, whose contracts did not expire, and will not expire for a long time. In order to entice those buyers they probably felt they should include it in the same association so they can add on a few points and use all of their points between the longhouses and the tower. They probably thought that Poly owners wouldn't like buying direct points in a building next door that is part of the same resort if it was not the same association. And the biggest fans of the Polynesian would be their biggest target market, and many of them already own or were looking into owning at the Poly.Isn't that the argument for Island Tower though? Could have forced those that want to stay there to buy there but didn't. Renewing or even just reselling BCV, BWV, etc. will be a lot cheaper then building a brand new resort like Island Tower... I would think at least.
There are exceptions to this: ski weeks at ski-in/ski-out resorts, ocean-front resorts during peak seasons in prime beach vacation destinations, etc. In other words: places where the resort enjoys an unusual and hard-to-replicate location advantage.
Don’t forget nostalgiaWDW is the heart of DVC and that part is akin to hard-to-replicate location advantage. No matter what alternatives are compared, there are advantages with DVC.
Whether comparing offsite economical acceptable hotels, All Stars, moderates, airbnb… there are ways DVC commonly beats them in head to head comparisons and that’s usually due to ease, parking, transportation, etc. After taking added time and expenses into consideration the alternatives start looking less attractive.
I think this is the secret sauce to DVC - what drives loyalty and demand and why salvage value remains. Walt was smart creating the bubble and DVD reaps the rewards.
I agree, but also think the location is superior to the previously sold restricted resorts, so it will be hard to make an exact comparison.I am excited to watch the launch of this Tower. This will be our greatest insight as to how restrictions impact demand.
That’s true but even when just comparing the total costs and experience, DVC has options that give most alternatives a run for their money.Don’t forget nostalgia
There are so many visitors who are new to WDW still though. My first visit was this year! I had previously been to Disneyland x 2 (decades ago both times) and Tokyo Disneyland x 2 (same story). I am always surprised by the nostalgia factor people mention as the entire place is still new to me. Disneyland is nostalgia to me.Don’t forget nostalgia
I agree, but also think the location is superior to the previously sold restricted resorts, so it will be hard to make an exact comparison.
Nostalgia can of course be anything and even in the most simplest of forms such as a smell, some may not even be completely around anymore but the memories can still be envisioned when triggered. It’s insanely powerful.There are so many visitors who are new to WDW still though. My first visit was this year! I had previously been to Disneyland x 2 (decades ago both times) and Tokyo Disneyland x 2 (same story). I am always surprised by the nostalgia factor people mention as the entire place is still new to me. Disneyland is nostalgia to me.
Yeah, I keep trying to talk myself into liking riveria. But I hate the location. It feels like a DVC expansion to a main resort without the main resort. And it’s right next to the moderate and value resorts feeling out of place.That's a good point. They haven't really sold a restricted resort with an amazing location yet. Riviera is close, maybe if they had a walking path to crescent lake. If they ever sold a resort with a setup like VGC with dedicated access to one of the WDW parks, I don't think they would have any trouble selling points there, even with restrictions.
They sell off Vero and Hilton Head, they try like heck to extend OKW again and rent out the rest, and then they rent and flip/demo BRV, BCV, and BWV.I really doubt they’d like to have an increase in cash room capacity of this magnitude on their hands. If demand is in any way similar to now in 2042, more deluxe rooms would be really difficult to fill. It certainly won’t jump sufficiently from 2041 to 2042.
I think the initial Grand floridian was better without magical beginnings. It was 207 with 22 off a point at 250 points. So 185. Price increased and with the free point incentive 250 points was 190 with the free point incentive during last summer's sale. During last summer magical beginnings was around though which wasn't during the initial offering. So they could get a rebate of $22 a point making it better if you sold back the first year of points.Are initial offerings always the best? Wasn't the VGF BPK firesale the best price for that? And wasn't it at the end just before it sold out?
Did initial buyers get previous years points (like giving 2024 points with the PIT) when the VGF expansion first opened? And just not get offered magical beginnings? If so then that is slightly better. If not then getting double points with magical beginnings selling the previous years' points back at the end of the firesale would work out to be the best deal.I think the initial Grand floridian was better without magical beginnings. It was 207 with 22 off a point at 250 points. So 185. Price increased and with the free point incentive 250 points was 190 with the free point incentive during last summer's sale. During last summer magical beginnings was around though which wasn't during the initial offering. So they could get a rebate of $22 a point making it better if you sold back the first year of points.
Curious if it will be a similar situation to RIV where if you owned resale prior to xxxx date you can use points at that resort. Still have a long time to find out.
I spoke to my guide and told her if incentives bring it to 200 or below to call me Oct 1 and do the contract. She said she would email me that day because she is working on the Wish but is looking forward to sending me a contract if that is the case. Although I did not ask directly about NY being allowed I'm sure she would have mentioned it if she couldn't sell me the points.I got the emails from which I couldn’t last time so my guess is it’s all set. But have not talked to him directly because we are no longer buying.
Those 2042 resorts were allowed when I bought my resale so won't then always be allowed then?
Just like resale prior to 2019 got all resorts so are allowed to use at RIV.
NOT BE ARGUMENTATIVE! Just trying to understand lol