That is pathetic. People give their kids phones to quiet them down because they don't want to interact with them. They just want them to shut up and that is okay now in our society? Families playing games and interacting: I spy, 20 questions, favorite ride, remember when, disney trivia, hangman, etc...don't have screaming group of kids. And if your kid cries a fit, you remove them from the restaurant as a consequence, not hand him/her an electronic as a reward.
In my day we handed the kids a set of keys to pop in his mouth, or a coloring book and place mat to color on. We dragged a pouch filled with stuff if teh meal was going to be a long one. Parents always brought something to occupy kids.
Now, because that was during the good old days, did that mean were better parents? No. We just used different methods. And while I am talking about those good old, day, since I was a part of those days, you could no more know why the parent handed the kid something to play then than you can today.
You assume a lot when you have not one clue what those folks do on a daily basis. That is what bothers me.
If it wasn't cell phones, it would be something else. If it wasn't sitting in a restaurant, they would complain they were on the phone while walking, or waiting in line, or something else.
People have always formed negative opinions on things done by others that they disagree with, only now, we're "lucky" enough to read about it on the web.
This is no different...some people will just judge and bash things that differ from what they do or how they do it.
I don't get it. My DGD is an only child and she is the only kid when we travel. My DD would probably die laughing if anyone suggested that the reason she gets to use her phone after we eat is because the family chooses not to interact with her.
I am the newest Iphone user in my family and this girl is having the time of her life showing me how to play games, so if anyone sees my nose buried in a phone either my own or as my DGD has her nose in hers, it is because she is either playing a game with me or teaching me to play one. We are engaged, and I like the methods we use.
But, again ... just because you see a family do that in the one moment of your life you see that family, doesn't mean they're all addicted to their electronics and are destined for lives of increased depression, anxiety and suicide.
Yes ... there are true electronics addicts out there. But unless you believe that every person you see drinking a glass of wine is an alcoholic, you shouldn't infer that every person checking their cellphone at dinner is addicted to electronics.
You're talking in extremes.
LOL! I know! All or nothing fo rsome folks.
I think it's better for everyone not to use it at all!
So if given the choice, yes! I'd be happy if they only used it while sitting.. So as not to hurt others..
Cannot use it when I'm sitting. New rules I guess.
I think it is the self righteousness that most people object to. Posters who find it so sad that other families don't act the way they do imply that their way is the right way and that everyone else is wrong. The other families aren't as happy, well adjusted, supportive as they are, isn't it sad......Well, no, those families don't seem sad, just different. My worldview doesn't dictate that others are inferior to me if they do things differently.
These technology threads always turn out this way. Our gadgets are blamed for making us less connected to each other. Then our gadgets are blamed for making us too connected to each other.
I know. It is the sanctimonious comments that I don't understand. I know that parenting styles differ, but who am I to say what is appropriate for every family? My DH seldom can accompany us so we spend a lot of time sending him photos or more often, sending them to my friend, who then shares them with him. She also knows how much I miss my girls when we are away, so she sends me pics, and has tehm call me often. I drop everything for those calls, and stop what I am doing when she texts me pics. These girls are my family too, and I don't stop interacting with tehm simply becasue I am 1500 miles away.