captin fink
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2002
- Messages
- 353
by Deb in IA
And flkhou, we all KNOW that Mr. Moore ALWAYS tells the whole truth and the ENTIRE story, don't we, and that he would never slant, distort, or even fabricate "facts" to further his own agenda
Here is a link that shows just how fair and even handed Mr. Moore is when he makes a documentary.
http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html
The injustice here is not so much to the viewer, as to the independent producers of real documentaries. These struggle in a field which receives but a fraction of the recognition and financing of the "entertainment industry." They are protected by Academy rules limiting the documentary competition to nonfiction.
Bowling is fiction. It makes its points by deceiving and by misleading the viewer. Statements are made which are false. Moore leads the reader to draw inferences which he must have known were wrong. Indeed, even speeches shown on screen are heavily edited, so that sentences are assembled in the speaker's voice, but which he never uttered. Bowling uses deliberate deception as its primary tool of persuasion and effect.
A film which does this may be a commercial success. It may be entertaining. But it is not a documentary. One need only consult Rule 12 of the rules for the Academy Award: a documentary is a non-fictional movie.
The point is not that Bowling is biased. No, the point is that Bowling is deliberately, seriously, and consistently deceptive.
[