After reviewing the threads on the WDW cutbacks, and the list of cutbacks, it seems to me that WDW's response is generally appropriate, IF attendance is truly way down, and IF they continue to monitor the situation and respond appropriately...
HOWEVER...
It seems that they could have generated much more goodwill if:
1--They gave at least SOME meaningful advance notice of the changes (say, one week)
2--They made it very clear that they don't anticipate that any of these changes are permanent, and that they will continously monitor attendance and bookings and respond quickly to improvements
3--They made a consistent effort to reach the customers directly affected by the changes and help them make alternative arrangements. From posts on these boards it appears that some folks with PSs, or resort ressies, which are no longer good have been contacted, while many have not.
4--They had good, consistent, reliable information about the changes available on their website and throughout the organization. For example, how have some folks still been told that they can make ressies at Pop Century?
5--They were willing to disclose more specific information about the affect on attendance and bookings, and changes. The variations in the impressions given on these boards about the crowd levels from recent visitors shows that anecdotal information on this is very unreliable. I know that this is against usual Disney policy and mindset, but if this is an extraordinary situation, then they should take extraordinary measures to communicate with their customers.
Too late for this, but don't you think that reactions would have been different if they had immediately sent a note to everyone on their reservation/PS list showing that there were dramatic drops in attendance, saying that they were contemplating significant changes in response, and directing folks to the official website where they had a special section devoted to spelling out the changes. Ideally, the website would then give the phone number to call on specific things, like rescheduling your Tony's breakfast, and the people who answered the phone would actually be prepared to reschedule.
I tend to think about these things as my wife is in PR, and I as a lawyer am often involved in "damage control" for my clients. It seems to me that Disney has plenty of resources and expertise in this regard. I don't fault them for their response during the immediate first two weeks after the attacks, but they have now had time to work this out, and I think their communications have been lacking.
Of course, there always seemed to be problems before with the CRO and the website keeping up with changes and giving accurate information. Perhaps the events of the last few weeks will prompt them to address these communications issues.