I do believe the Captain has nailed it!
A perfect example of what I said above. People build timeless memories around thousands of things. That doesn't make all of them appropriate business ventures for Disney, or any other company for that matter.They may actually be building timeless memories around it. Pop could be the memory of a lifetime for many, many families. This goes way beyond "liking it" and you simply have to be able to grasp this.
So there is no point in debating anything Disney has ever done, since it is impossible to prove any alternative strategy would have yielded better results.I too deplore the "they could have done better" argument because it is impossible to prove and therefore impossible to debate.
With all the creative brainpower that has gone throught Disney from that time until today, I believe that, if what some of you claim is possible could really be done, then it would have been done.
Originally posted by crusader
Cut me a break!
(resorting to such blatant tactics to conceal one's identity doesn't deserve such praise) Unless of course you have a vested interest somewhere.
If you do think WDW should offer a "Value" alternative, then I say there is no evidence offered that Disney could do "immensely" better than the All-Stars and PC.
Huh?Originally posted by Phoebesaturn
This argument has be fought time and time again....and past pricing of the Contemp and Poly have proven otherwise.
Originally posted by DancingBear
Huh?
Originally posted by DancingBear
I'm still not following how "past pricing" of the Poly and Contemporary are evidence that "Value" resorts could be better.
Originally posted by DVC-Landbaron
OK! Let me get this straight! If I tell you, in answer to the narrow definition of your question, that PC is a success, can we then go on to the higher and more important philosophical question.
If so...
YES!!!! It seems to be a success!
---------------------End of original Question ---------------------
Originally posted by Captain Crook
Of course it is seldom noted that those prices in those days didn't offer the current breadth of choices that a current WDW stay does...Insignificant? I think not...
![]()
Like I said before, I must have missed some sort of sarcasm, irony, trenchant wit in your post I must be the blame for not rising to your sophisticated humor!! Or else youre just plain NUTS!!!! (said humorously, of course!)I won't even go into how unimaginative and boring the contemporary, the golf resort, ft wilderness, or even the Polynesian is.
They should offer THE Disney experience. Period. If they can do that for economy (They are NOT a VALUE!!!!!) prices, then they could (or even should) provide it. If not, a resounding NO!!!!!If you don't think Disney should offer "Value" accomodations, then your answer to this question is no.
Again, they are not a value! But that aside, just because you didnt see any evidence doesnt mean it could not be done. No one saw any evidence that the amusement going crowd would be WOWed by Pirates, before they thought it up! And no one saw any evidence that the country needed a theme park, before they did it. No! They should be leading that industry that you seem to hold in high regard. Instead they follow. And most of the time they lag far behind.If you do think WDW should offer a "Value" alternative, then I say there is no evidence offered that Disney could do "immensely" better than the All-Stars and PC.
Please fill in the blanks for me!!! I feel like Im really out of the loop!Cut me a break!
(resorting to such blatant tactics to conceal one's identity doesn't deserve such praise) Unless of course you have a vested interest somewhere.
It simply means that weve worked the numbers. We worked them to death. And it turns out that in todays money the poly would cost $125 a night!!! Now perhaps you can see why I refuse to call those cheap, gaudy decorated NON-Disney like aberrations Values.I'm still not following how "past pricing" of the Poly and Contemporary are evidence that "Value" resorts could be better.
TOTALLY insignificant!! My dear Pirate! AGAIN, you ask the wrong question!! Price, cost and all other things combined is absolutely insignificant compared to providing THE DISNEY EXPERIENCE!!!Of course it is seldom noted that those prices in those days didn't offer the current breadth of choices that a current WDW stay does...Insignificant?
Of course it is seldom noted that those prices in those days didn't offer the current breadth of choices that a current WDW stay does...Insignificant? I think not...
And just because you say it could be done doesn't mean you're correct. Again, no Imagineer has the ability to magically alter the economics of the motel business.Originally posted by DVC-Landbaron ....just because you didnt see any evidence doesnt mean it could not be done.
Oh, please. Disney charged what the market would bear then, just as they do now. If it was so cheap to stay on Disney property back then, just why was 192 loaded with Econolodges?It simply means that weve worked the numbers. We worked them to death. And it turns out that in todays money the poly would cost $125 a night!!! Now perhaps you can see why I refuse to call those cheap, gaudy decorated NON-Disney like aberrations Values.
What, does Disney live in some magical vacuum where they can just randomly set prices for their resorts? Of course not. The pricing is dictated by supply (including off-site competitors) and demand. They couldn't have raised the prices for the "deluxe" resorts unless the market allowed it.Originally posted by YoHo
Wait so, if you offered what is now called deluxe at what was moderate pricing in 1972. Then, you built hotels that hhad fewer amenities, no views of the park etc etdc. you should raise the price of the old room and htis is a good thing?
It's a load of Cow doots that's what it is.
I got no problem with this position, only with the idea that WDW could have done much better with their "value" options.Originally posted by raidermatt
It does mean that if you can't offer an immersive experience at $59 per night, pehaps you shouldn't offer anything at $59 per night.
I don't know what numbers were presented before, but there is simply no way that the costs of building and outfitting PC are even roughly equivalent to building a new deluxe. Cinderblock buildings with flat roofs and exterior walkways, minimal landscaping and big pools vs. a building with pitched and decorative roofs, carpeted interior hallways, themed interiors (look at all of the light fixtures in the hallways at AKL or WL), heavily landscaped exteriors and pools with amenities? The furniture? The restaurant facilities? What a joke.Originally posted by Phoebesaturn
If fact if I remember correctly didn't someone post some numbers one time that showed that the building cost between the different hotels was not that far off and didn't justify the current price gaps?