SweetIf the new tower is part of the existing PVB condominium association, that’s correct.
SweetIf the new tower is part of the existing PVB condominium association, that’s correct.
Did anyone write down how the question was asked? Can anyone quote the question? I was on the west coast and didn’t hear it clearly on the live stream.While the legal setup will not be fully confirmed until the condo association is amended to add the new tower, Chang stated that "our plans right now are for the new tower to be part of the existing Polynesian resort."
I believe it is quoted near verbatim over on the speculate about poly thread…probably several pages back by now.Did anyone write down how the question was asked? Can anyone quote the question? I was on the west coast and didn’t hear it clearly on the live stream.
Dear Disney Vacation Club, THANK YOU for your decision to include the new Polynesian tower in the existing Polynesian DVC association. You will be hearing from me when those points go on sale... as long as there are some good incentives!
Sincerely,
A happy Polynesian DVC owner
Honestly, if you love Riviera, Riviera resale is the best deal you can get in the entire DVC system right now. I don't love Riviera (largely because of the location), and have seriously considered it, because the price point is so attractive.Definitely not. And I may be done with direct. I will just add more resale RiV when I am ready for more points.
Especially if they end up dropping the restrictions...Honestly, if you love Riviera, Riviera resale is the best deal you can get in the entire DVC system right now. I don't love Riviera (largely because of the location), and have seriously considered it, because the price point is so attractive.
I strongly suspected that, but I wouldn't say I "knew" it, given that CCV is a different association from BRV. It always just seemed inconceivable to me that Disney would not take this chance to balance out the most weirdly unbalanced resort (only studios and Bungalows) in DVC, to end up with an overall more attractive, saleable product, while conveniently (for them) knocking several years off the points they are selling. The main counterargument seems to have been "but what about the integrity of the resale restrictions policy?" which always seemed very thin to me as I would expect Disney to be much more concerned about their bottom line than this kind of philosophical objection, and I don't think anyone seriously disputes that PVB2 will sell faster in the same association than it would have done in a new one.I knew this from the beginning. It's not a new hotel like Riviera so it has to be included in the existing association.
I’m an optimist. And I can handle whatever happens. I’m not spending any money (or not) until points are officially on sale. I have not been making any moves whatsoever due to the uncertainty that surrounded this, including not buying direct VGF or RIV, or any resale. I have been playing a waiting game.Don’t send out your “Thank you” cards just yet.
My understanding is that the answer given was vague enough or at least left room for interpretation.
I know many people assumes that the tower will be part of the current association and it very well might be but until we hear something officially from DVD we honestly don’t know.
But let me throw this at you. Poly will definitely sell better as part of the PVB association, we agree. But I think I given its popularity, location, newness it was always going to sell pretty well. RIV and now VDH are clearly on the struggle bus of sales. Why hurt their direct sales further? Because it’s going to right? Does anyone have RIV and VDH doing better sales after this decision? Unless they give some crazy incentives to get them moving but that also goes against their bottom line. Do you think this a move to remove the restrictions all together?I strongly suspected that, but I wouldn't say I "knew" it, given that CCV is a different association from BRV. It always just seemed inconceivable to me that Disney would not take this chance to balance out the most weirdly unbalanced resort (only studios and Bungalows) in DVC, to end up with an overall more attractive, saleable product, while conveniently (for them) knocking several years off the points they are selling. The main counterargument seems to have been "but what about the integrity of the resale restrictions policy?" which always seemed very thin to me as I would expect Disney to be much more concerned about their bottom line than this kind of philosophical objection, and I don't think anyone seriously disputes that PVB2 will sell faster in the same association than it would have done in a new one.
I've seen many posters here who say they love RIV and are not concerned about its restrictions. People like that will continue to buy RIV and it will eventually sell out. VGF2 has been an alternative product suitable for those who are concerned about resale restrictions; now that it has sold out, PVB2 can fill that role. I'm sure there are others like me who would never consider buying points with RIV-style restrictions, and putting PVB2 in the same association gives Disney the ability to sell direct points to these people who would otherwise be forced into O14 resale.But let me throw this at you. Poly will definitely sell better as part of the PVB association, we agree. But I think I given its popularity, location, newness it was always going to sell pretty well. RIV and now VDH are clearly on the struggle bus of sales. Why hurt their direct sales further? Because it’s going to right? Does anyone have RIV and VDH doing better sales after this decision? Unless they give some crazy incentives to get them moving but that also goes against their bottom line. Do you think this a move to remove the restrictions all together?
I bought resale and I can still stay at CCV.I strongly suspected that, but I wouldn't say I "knew" it, given that CCV is a different association from BRV. It always just seemed inconceivable to me that Disney would not take this chance to balance out the most weirdly unbalanced resort (only studios and Bungalows) in DVC, to end up with an overall more attractive, saleable product, while conveniently (for them) knocking several years off the points they are selling. The main counterargument seems to have been "but what about the integrity of the resale restrictions policy?" which always seemed very thin to me as I would expect Disney to be much more concerned about their bottom line than this kind of philosophical objection, and I don't think anyone seriously disputes that PVB2 will sell faster in the same association than it would have done in a new one.
Can you please elaborate on this. Been off the boards for a while. Trying to play catchup on all the Poly 2 threads. This makes me pause my resale strategy. We need the 2 bedroom at Poly2. Resale allows us to buy more points at this EPCOT resort for longer Food & Wine Stays 10 days would be ideal. Blue Card status is a nice to have. We (kids) already are grandfathered in until 2054. I will need Futurama tech to make it that long.Very smart. Just a tiny amount of risk that Disney will change their minds about the same association, but this seems very unlikely.
Between the time that what you quote was posted and now, DVD has officially confirmed that Poly tower will be part of PVB. So there’s no longer any risk that Disney will change their minds.Can you please elaborate on this. Been off the boards for a while. Trying to play catchup on all the Poly 2 threads. This makes me pause my resale strategy. We need the 2 bedroom at Poly2. Resale allows us to buy more points at this EPCOT resort for longer Food & Wine Stays 10 days would be ideal. Blue Card status is a nice to have. We (kids) already are grandfathered in until 2054. I will need Futurama tech to make it that long.
Appreciate the clarification!Between the time that what you quote was posted and now, DVD has officially confirmed that Poly tower will be part of PVB. So there’s no longer any risk that Disney will change their minds.
Because it’s not a restricted resort unlike Riviera.Can somebody be able to explain why I can stay at CCV and I bought resale if it's a different association?
At present, restricted resale only applies to RIV and VDH. Anyone who purchases resale at a restricted resort can only stay at that resort.Can somebody be able to explain why I can stay at CCV and I bought resale if it's a different association?
I knew this from the beginning. It's not a new hotel like Riviera so it has to be included in the existing association.