beastlyprince
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2002
- Messages
- 378
This has always been United's policy. "If a flight is oversold, no one may be denied boarding against his/her will until UA or other carrier personnel first ask for volunteers who will give up their reservations willingly in exchange for compensation as determined by UA. If there are not enough volunteers, other passengers may be denied boarding involuntarily in accordance with UA’s boarding priority." In fact it's the policy of most airlines. That doesn't make it less crappy, but it's their policy.
It should also be noted it wasn't United that physically removed the passenger, it was CPD. They are the ones that got violent and will most likely (rightfully) have a lawsuit brought against them.
Absolutely correct on all counts. Their policy is what it is and all passengers have access to that information before booking. Not that anybody reads that stuff, but it's in the fine print and is binding none the less. That said, there's absolutely no reason for United to EVER end up actually treating paying customers that way. None. It doesn't even make financial sense, since carriers have all sorts of inter-carrier discounts for shuttling employees around in a pinch. Two major airports in a city and you want to say you can't get four human beings on an alternate flight? Bull. It happens all the time.This has always been United's policy. "If a flight is oversold, no one may be denied boarding against his/her will until UA or other carrier personnel first ask for volunteers who will give up their reservations willingly in exchange for compensation as determined by UA. If there are not enough volunteers, other passengers may be denied boarding involuntarily in accordance with UA’s boarding priority." In fact it's the policy of most airlines. That doesn't make it less crappy, but it's their policy.
It should also be noted it wasn't United that physically removed the passenger, it was CPD. They are the ones that got violent and will most likely (rightfully) have a lawsuit brought against them.
Two other thoughts...
1. There's only one winner in this whole situation: Pepsi.
2. This only goes to show how badly some people want to get out of Chicago. Or how badly some people want to get to Kentucky. Or both.![]()
Two other thoughts...
1. There's only one winner in this whole situation: Pepsi.
2. This only goes to show how badly some people want to get out of Chicago. Or how badly some people want to get to Kentucky. Or both.![]()
What is so good about KY besides basketball and horses? lolTwo other thoughts...
1. There's only one winner in this whole situation: Pepsi.
2. This only goes to show how badly some people want to get out of Chicago. Or how badly some people want to get to Kentucky. Or both.![]()
What is so good about KY besides basketball and horses? lol