LindsayDunn228 said:
On the DisABILITIES board, a CM made the comment that he/she (don't remember) would say to people in
ECV's, upon entering a park, "don't speed in there!!" Really, why oh why, would someone feel the need to say that to someone??
I wanted to check in what context the CM posted this comment, so I did search for it on the disABILITIES Board.
The CM posting it has been on the disABILITIES Board since close to the beginning of the board. He uses an ECV/
scooter for mobility, as did his wife (who is now deceased).
So, the comment was coming from someone using an ECV to someone else using a mobility aid. I believe he assumed that people reading the thread knew that. Most of the people commenting (who I think knew he uses a scooter), thought the comment was funny. But, coming from someone who was using a scooter, as opposed to someone who was not, makes a difference in the content of the message.
The other situation (the people in the grocery store) were being dumb, but that happens with lots of situations, not just people with disabilities. My nephew has blazing orange hair and since the time he was a baby, he has heard things like "Do you have a temper to go with that red hair?....Do you glow in the dark?....Touching red hair is good luck, can I touch it?" It used to really bother him -especially the people who rubbed his head without warning. When he was about 5, he told his mom that as soon as he was old enough, he wanted to dye his hair black. He has since come up with some other ideas -like if asked if he has a temper to go with the red hair, he tells people if they keep making comments like that, they will find out. He's also told people if they want to rub his head, there is a charge.
It brings up the whole question of language. I have spent a lot of time trying to bend over backwards to use words that are inclusive and not demeaning or insulting to anyone, but it is hard. It was embarrasing when I was a Public Health Nurse to tell people about some of the places I could refer them to for financial and other assistance (the main agency was the "Bureau for Crippled Children"). Most of those really heavily charged words/terms are not used anymore, but it is hard to come up with things where people know what you mean and no one is offended.
Some of the terms are difficult to interpret (like, what is an "Exeptional Parent" - I don't know, but there is a magazine by that name for parents of children with "Special Needs.") and some people are offended by them (some don't like special needs or exceptional, some do).
I used to write about the "Accessible" parking or "Accessible" rooms at WDW, but then people would write back to ask if they could use their "Handicapped Parking Permit" there.
And what is a perfectly acceptable term for one group/person is sometimes considered demeaning by someone else. I have seen people with disabilities wearing T shirts with messages that say things like:
"Not DISabled, differently abled"
"I'm handicapable" (The person who was my co-Moderator on the disABILITIES Board when it first started had that as a tagline.)
But, other people might not like those terms.
I didn't like the name of the disABILITIES Board at first, but it was chosen by people with disabilities (not people like me who are the parent of a person with a disability) and they thought it was a clever play on words (We enABLE people with disabilities to have information that sometimes makes a trip to WDW possible when they thought it was impossible. ABILITIES is the stressed word).
I once made the mistake of posting something that my DD signed to me (she is not able to speak). She called herself a "Wheelchair girl" and was signing to me that she saw another "Wheelchair girl" while we were out somewhere - at that time it was kind of a novelty for her to see other people using wheelchairs because there were none in her school. Anyway, I posted that story and got flamed on the thread, and got PMs saying that I was more or less abusing my child because I was giving her the identity of a piece of equipment rather than a capable person with a disability and that I should not refer to her as a "wheelchair girl" and should teach her not to refer to herself that way, instead using more enabling words.
But, she uses sign language which she modifies to fit her abilites to make the signs. She was the person who put the signs "wheelchair" and "girl" together to refer to herself - which I thought was pretty clever, considering that she doesn't have a large selection of signs to use and these did fit. I was careful not to post anything like that again (until now). It's not fun to get nasty PMs for something you thought was a cute comment when you posted it.