Do you think that matters at this point in the process? I didn't even think of that. My head was in case they had multiple Kim P.
I think it probably doesn't. I can't imagine that would be a reason for a rejection. I just realized that's how current panelists are listed... Admittedly my name is less common than Kim. And it's not like they're using these videos for public release, so I think we're good. It was just a thought I had
I don't even have my name written anywhere in the video. I say it, and it is the title of the video, but it is not written anywhere.
I don’t think it matters which way you do it! But I totally get the temptation to overanalyze every application detail after the round closes. Because I’m totally guilty
Lol sorry! With my brain it's completely inevitable! I'm sorry if I brought y'all down with me!
Don't be silly... I was already down there LOL
Girl we are all already overthinking ALL of our submission.
I dont know that it changes anything for us. They may be looking at current planDisney panelist that have experience with the travel to those locations or even a number that applied this year that ALSO have that experience. Just provides more opportunities.
OMG, you're right, they did! I hadn't remembered they asked because it was a question I just said no to, but you're right! It's right there! And I agree If it means a larger class, I'm all for it! ...I'm not going to lie, my first instinct was that I'd be at a disadvantage because I have no experience there and there would be some spots reserved for that
Maybe they don't expect to get enough questions about them for it to be anyone's primary focus, just secondary? So the recency requirement isn't as relevant...
Did I hallucinate or did it say that in all the info? I thought they mentioned it in everything. Maybe that was last year they included the Wish specifically.
I didn't see anything specific, just that it was WDW and a cruise. Did I miss it? Very possibly!
