Pics of MJs children

Does anyone else find it sadly ironic that the children naturally have the facial features that Michael nearly killed himself getting thru plastic surgery?


Poor things :sad:

I thought the exact same thing when I first looked at the pictures. The older boy resembles him so much it's uncanny. At least, I think so.

I think there is a strong resemblance actually....

OH and I am sure I am in the minority but I don't think losing a parent as sick, twisted and messed up as MJ is that much of a loss. Sad sure but no matter where they go now they will be far better off. Flame me I don't care.


Not going to 'flame' you, but I am going to STRONGLY disagree with you. THey are young, and that man was their father!
No one (that I"m aware of) has ever heard a bad thing about those kids, and in the pictures in the OP, they seem like happy go lucky kids...


And, to the main theme of this thread.. I never heard one way or the other if MJ was adament in saying they were BIOLOGICALLY his. I think it is very possible, but it's not definite. Regardless, they were *his* children, and I feel very sad for them....
 
I also thought the older boy resembled MJ- which is ironic because MJ didn't look a thing like he did as a child- maybe it's the way the boy was standing etc. He seemed to have the same mannerisms.

Anyway- I hope they do okay. They aren't used to "the real world" and if there is no money left this is going to be even more difficult for them.
 
I really don't think MJ is the bio dad. No because the kids don't look "black enough" but because none of them remotely resembles ANY pre-surgery Jackson family member in facial features. (Michael had the MOST surgery, but he wasn't alone in having it.) There are a LOT of Jacksons and it seems those kids would look like SOME Jackson, but I just don't see it.

I have seen many children who do not look at all like either of their parents and they are biologically theirs:confused3

I think the shape of the eyes is very similar to Michael's just not the color (as I said earlier these beautiful children seem to have eye color similar to Vanessa Williams)
 
What really matters is that these poor little children have suffered a life altering loss of the person who loved them most.

I certainly hope Debbie Rowe (sp?) can't get her hands on them as she really seems heartless and she did give up all ties to her kids for money.

And yet Michael was a Saint to pay someone who needed money to be his surogate?

That was pretty much how Michael Jackson worked-paying unfortunates a lot of $$ to get what he wanted-His own kids, Poor parents of young Hispanic Boys to play with, Doctors to give him drugs.:sad2:
 

My sister is white, her husband is black, and their two children have light skin and light hair. You would not know that they are bi-racial at all to look at them. It has led to lots of awkward situations - once when her husband was in the park with his daughter, someone said to him "why would you adopt a white child?" Genetics can work in mysterious ways!

Teresa
 
And yet Michael was a Saint to pay someone who needed money to be his surogate?

That was pretty much how Michael Jackson worked-paying unfortunates a lot of $$ to get what he wanted-His own kids, Poor parents of young Hispanic Boys to play with, Doctors to give him drugs.:sad2:

Never said he was a saint just someone who desperately wanted children of his own:confused3

Many people who cannot or choose not to have babies use A.I or surrogates such as Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick who just had twin girls by a surrogate.

Do you consider these two huge stars and thousands of others in the same category as Michael Jackson--someone who pays "unfortunates a lot of $$ to get what" they wanted--their own kids?

Regardless, I feel for his little children who just lost their Daddy.
 
These kids are his, whether bio or not. Once you adopt a child they are yours and your family, your children. I think we forget this and are looking at it not from a family perspective. It shouldn't matter to anyone if he was the sperm donor or not. Legally they are his and that is all that should matter. So now it is up to the mother and their arrangements as to where they live and grow up.
 
Regardless of the feelings I had for MJ, I do feel extremely sorry for those 3 children. Having lost my father at a very young age,I can tell you from experience the rest of their lives they will experience great sorrow. I hope and pray they get the help they need because the pain never goes away completely.
 
http://www.newsoftheworld.co.uk/new...e-Rowe-confesses-he-was-not-their-father.html

Interesting as the mother of the children (the two oldest) has confirmed that donor sperm was used and that she doesn't expect to see them again. Poor children this is going to be hard for them, and for all these who say he is there father no matter what children of donor sperm over here are demanding the rights to know who there biological father is and not knowing is painful for them.
 
Didn't take Debbie long to talk did it? What if those kids didn't know MJ wasn't their bio Dad? She's right about one thing- she's not a good mother.
I hope the nanny gets them- they call her Mom for heaven's sake!
 
I don't know if I believe Debbie Rowe either. I mean, look at her record! Why is she coming out now--to get another big paycheck?! Sad that the kids have to hear that stuff, whether's its true or not.:sad2: I think she is a money hungry witch with a capital B!

Now, if they aren't his, shouldn't there be adoption papers? Or would he be considered the step parent since he was married to their birth mom? I am just wondering if Catherine Jackson would have any claim to the children if they are not blood related or if there are not adoption papers saying they are his legal children? And if he has it in his will that he wants the nanny to raise the kids, that would be interesting. I hope she gets them, because I can't see MJ's mom as an appropriate guardian, especially given her age.

Marsha
 
I don't know if I believe Debbie Rowe either. I mean, look at her record! Why is she coming out now--to get another big paycheck?! Sad that the kids have to hear that stuff, whether's its true or not.:sad2: I think she is a money hungry witch with a capital B!

Now, if they aren't his, shouldn't there be adoption papers? Or would he be considered the step parent since he was married to their birth mom? I am just wondering if Catherine Jackson would have any claim to the children if they are not blood related or if there are not adoption papers saying they are his legal children? And if he has it in his will that he wants the nanny to raise the kids, that would be interesting. I hope she gets them, because I can't see MJ's mom as an appropriate guardian, especially given her age.

Marsha
His name is on their birth certificates so unless someone comes forward to challenge- I think it stands that he WAS their father. Hopefully he had a will and said who he wanted to have the children (the Nanny).
 
Wow. Just wow. I also hope the nanny gets the kids.


ya know what.
why on earth wouldn't Micheal have his own blood kids?
most do agree they were artificially inseminated, but why would he not be the donor? actually makes no sense.
 
These kids are his, whether bio or not. Once you adopt a child they are yours and your family, your children. I think we forget this and are looking at it not from a family perspective. It shouldn't matter to anyone if he was the sperm donor or not. Legally they are his and that is all that should matter. So now it is up to the mother and their arrangements as to where they live and grow up.

I think it matters because if they are not biologically his, there is a greater chance that whatever guardianship he may have set up for his kids may be challenged. Particularly if he is listed as the bio dad but is not which means the biological father would not have had a chance to file for custody originally and could now do so.

Like it or not, right or wrong, our current system is set up to favor biological parents. It's almost ridiculous the lengths to which the system will go to try to keep kids with a biological father or mother, even if the children have never known that person or that person is not a fit parent. This is where things could get sticky for his children if they are indeed not his biologically.

I saw an article that said he knew he was in failing health and had asked Janet to consider taking custody of his kids. I don't know if this is true or not. I am a bit surprised by everyone who said he was such a good father. Granted, the only thing I have ever heard about him as a father was dangling the youngest over the balcony, but I was always under the impression that he was very irresponsible towards his children.
 
ya know what.
why on earth wouldn't Micheal have his own blood kids?
most do agree they were artificially inseminated, but why would he not be the donor? actually makes no sense.

I heard years ago. (although, I have no documentation), that when MJ was a kid, his dad made him get "surgery" that would cause his voice to not drop... to keep his singing nice and high pitched.

IF this is true.. then, he probably couldn't have children. But again, I'm not sure how true that is.. just something i heard a long time ago, and always wished it wasn't true.. for his sake.
 
To me, it's astounding how much they resemble post-surgery MJ. Family resemblence is a funny thing, though. I was adopted. I am constantly told how much I resemble my sister or how I have my neices' smiles or my dad's eyes (I share no DNA with any of them.)

And those kids....they have MJ's (new) nose. That is WEIRD!
 




New Posts









Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE











DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom