I think what people are getting at is that "bait and switch" is a legal term with a legal definition. And what Disney did does not meet the legal definition of bait and switch - not remotely.
Since Raglan Road has been so successful, I'm sure we'll see more in that vein. Third party operated venues with their own theme, mixture of kid friendly and adult friendly venues. Fine by me. Although like I mentioned before, I do think there is room for uniquely Disney offerings to be mixed in as well.
Dinner show- I think part of what closed PI was the fact it was only open at night. I think we'll see venues that are in operation from lunch until late, with a few breakfast options thrown in.
I am looking forward to what they come up with (espeically as an SSR owner). I know Disney has been moving down the outsourcing path on many activities, I am wary but am trusting that the Disney magic will remain.
Oh, and a good coffee shop. Please. Pretty please.
I doubt that most people would perceive that nuance (assuming they even agree with it) unless you said that there was no breach of contract, explicitly, every time you misused the term "bait and switch". So folks misusing the term should be prepared to have such misuse corrected each time.