Palo vs Remy for brunch

[itsstanley]

Which is better over all including price point? I know the DIS did a Palo brunch but could not find a Remy brunch. Any one insight would be great!

 

[abdgeek]

The prices for both brunches have gone up from what they were when they were originally introduced, but I always do both when possible when I cruise with DCL. Palo is a traditional brunch that also includes entrees that you order while Remy is not. Remy is a multi-course meal. IMO the extra cost is worth the level of service and food that you get, but I’m biased because I always do a Remy/Palo brunch and Remy/Palo dinner when I cruise.

 

[Mainsail Minnie]

Palo. So many items to choose from. Remy brunch is a fixed menu that someone else chooses for you.

 

[serrem]

I've done both, and they're both beyond excellent. The Remy brunch, at least the last time I did it, was considerably more expensive than Palo. The deciding factor in my vote for Palo is three things: Chicken Parmigiana, Chicken Parmigiana, and Chicken Parmigiana.

 

[Calantha]

I’ve only done Palo (First cruise was in June) - but it was a highlight for sure.

 

[bcwife76]

We've done both and while Remy was lovely, Palo suits our tastes better (lots to choose from, etc).

 

[JaimeInParker]

we have done both brunchs and we prefer and will continue to do Palo's for brunch - to be able to serve myself items that I love and then be able to order other hot items - MAKES IT THE BEST

 

[Ralph&Pam]

we have done both brunchs and we prefer and will continue to do Palo's for brunch - to be able to serve myself items that I love and then be able to order other hot items - MAKES IT THE BEST

^^^This.