our secret green club? Part 8

[LizzySwan1022]

what does it mean?

You're Welcome my little cabbage, don''t worry, apparently the French like Cabbage!

 

[LizzySwan1022]

Ummm, too many candy ciggerettes today or something?!?!?

I think Charlie is awesome!

 

[Princess89]

THE OFFICIAL FMC ENTRANCE EXAM!
Your Mind is NC-17 Rated

You're mind is so filthy... you should should be washing every part of you out with soap.
If your thoughts can go dirty, they do. Almost everything is NC-17 to you!

Do You Have a Dirty Mind?

http://www.blogthings.com/doyouhaveadirtymindquiz/

This one is mine

***Your Mind is PG-13 Rated***


Your mind is definitely a little dirty. You're naughty, but not trashy.
You don't shy away from a dirty joke, and you're clearly not a prude.


Do You Have a Dirty Mind?
http://www.blogthings.com/doyouhaveadirtymindquiz/

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

HI mary, soon as I saw your GREEN light was on I had to zip forward to the last page so I wouldn't miss you.

Emily had a wonderful time, absolutely exhausted though of course due to the 6 hour time difference and the fact that most days they had them on the go for 12 hours.

She became ill the 2nd day they got there and from then on had to sit at the front of the bus so she could beg to be let off. Since they were travelling back roads I can't believe the types of bathrooms she ended up using. She has pictures that are awesome, until she could barely hold her head up and someone else grabbed her camerea to use. After that all we have are pics of cobblestone roads, doors and the same thing over & over & over.

Once she wakes up a bit more i am sure i can tease actual info out of her other than the fact that she was so ill.

Sorry I missed you! Aw, so sorry to hear she was sick so much. Glad she was able to have some fun though. Really glad that she's home now!

 

[pixie dust 112]

If you can find some NON-invisible ink let me know what you think of it. I am still trying to get final reservations....and be satisfied with them. WE have everynight booked - but then read bad things about places we're going... ...Speaking of which, do you like Boatwrights?....

ALthough I've stayed at POR many times, we have never eaten at BOatwrights. My kids like the food court, so we just eat there.

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

I already saw that one. Lyrics and whatever sounds good.

Gee that ought to go over well: "Hey baby ya wanna go see Lyrics and Whatever this weekend?!?!" What a romantic!

 

[pixie dust 112]

Thank you. Mother if you continue to make fun of me I will uncerimoniously post the 4 papers I've had to do so far for my genetic research paper. I can asure they are quite boring.

Would anyone care to edit all of the spelling errors in the above post?

So, the genetic research papers will keep Hugh entertained...the rest of us will just put you on ignore!!!!

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

Good morning all you Limeys. I'm up early this morning. Headed off to go fishing with Kim's daddy. Hoping to catch some big redfish. Talk to all y'all later.

Have fun & hope you catch lots!

 

[LizzySwan1022]

Would anyone care to edit all of the spelling errors in the above post?

So, the genetic research papers will keep Hugh entertained...the rest of us will just put you on ignore!!!!

You asked for it...

Genetics in relationship to the law is a subject riddled with ethical, and technical issues. Should DNA of convicted criminals be kept in a data bank? Is it okay to take DNA samples for one case, and then use them again in another? David Lazer’s DNA and the Criminal Justice System discusses these topics along with others pertaining to the subject of genetics in connection to solving criminal investigations.
I believe that the UN should allocate funds towards genetic databases, research, and equipment in countries, which could otherwise not afford it. In regards to the Innocence Project in 2000 Peter Neufeld said, “One attorney… had a position that thousands of innocent people are in jail because of DNA typing. That same attorney has this position—thousands of innocent people are in jail because of no DNA typing.” In under privileged countries where stereotypes often serve as the basis for guilt and innocence in a trial, it would be beneficial to have the valuable DNA equipment we have in the United States and Great Britain today. Unfortunately innocent people are also in jail do to DNA typing. DNA typing can tell us who was at a murder, but it cannot tell us who committed the murder. However it takes a very skilled criminal to leave no trace of DNA.
Many people argue that a DNA database would be a violation of privacy, and the fourth amendment. However others argue that by committing a serious crime, such as rape, you forfeit your fourth amendment rights. The big problem with DNA databases is that they can cause as many problems as they solve. For instance if an insurance company got a hold of a person’s genetic profile, they could isolate the genes which make a person more likely to have a heart attack, and push that person’s rates higher. It is still my firm belief that with proper security a nation-wide if not worldwide database would be beneficial in dealing with crimes on a global scale.
Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer reminds us that those in the courtroom do not always understand the complex sciences at work during cases where genetic evidence is involved, “Since the implications of our legal decisions in the real world often can and should play a role in these decisions, the clearer our understanding of the relevant science, the better. But I repeat: We are not scientists; hence the dilemma.” Even if a judge does not understand how a genetic profile is derived, they understand that it is unmistakable evidence that a certain person was at a crime scene.
DNA is a much more reliable source than fingerprinting. Case in point, the Rojas case in Argentina in 1892. Two young children were murdered, and the original suspect was the mother’s suitor, Velasquez. Torture, which was a standard practice at that point in time failed to extract a confession from Velasquez. After the failed torture attempts, detectives examined the crime scene for fingerprints, finding one bloody fingerprint, which matched the victims’ mother. When confronted with the evidence, Rojas confessed. Still, the bloody fingerprint would not have been proof without a confession, seeing that Rojas could have touched the bodies. Fingerprinting is still useful, but not as concrete as DNA.
In Washington v. State, the Supreme Court of Florida determined that the authorities can trick a suspect into providing a DNA sample by claiming that the sample is for a different case. When Alice Berdat was murdered in her bedroom, the investigator suspected Anthony Washington. The investigator did not let on that he suspected Washington, when he solicited him for a DNA sample for an unrelated case. When Washington tried to stop the state from using samples in the investigation, the court denied the motion, and Washington was arrested on charges of murder, burglary, and sexual battery. Some feel that tricking a person into providing a DNA sample for a case other than what is specified when attaining the sample in unethical. I feel that trickery is in general unethical, but there is an exception to the rule when you are tricking a potentially dangerous criminal into providing a sample for an investigation.
DNA typing is not an easy process. Different types of tests must be used in different scenarios. For example Y-STR analysis is useful for identifying victims of mass disasters. However Y-STR is completely useless in other scenarios.
The only place where fingerprinting is superior to DNA analysis is when a case involves identical twins, whose genetic make-up is the same, but who have different fingerprints. Genetics are complex. It is necessary to remember that only two percent of the human genome differentiates enough for use in forensic investigations. But genetics are also extremely accurate in pinpointing a criminal when there are many suspects.

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

ALthough I've stayed at POR many times, we have never eaten at BOatwrights. My kids like the food court, so we just eat there.

They are either in the middle or just finished redoing the food court there.

 

[pixie dust 112]

Does anyone know what LizzY wrote...I have her on ignore

 

[pixie dust 112]

They are either in the middle or just finished redoing the food court there.

Yup. I think it's supposed to be done soon. It will be done in plenty of time for Hugh's visit!

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

Would anyone care to edit all of the spelling errors in the above post?

So, the genetic research papers will keep Hugh entertained...the rest of us will just put you on ignore!!!!

Don't pick on her, she didn't misspell them, she is expressing her creativity. Remember her personality test --she's one of a kind!

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

Does anyone know what LizzY wrote...I have her on ignore

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

 

[LizzySwan1022]

Does anyone know what LizzY wrote...I have her on ignore

Oh you do not! You're such a liar, and if you do than I can post some seriously embarassing pics if I want

 

[pixie dust 112]

Don't pick on her, she didn't misspell them, she is expressing her creativity. Remember her personality test --she's one of a kind!

I tend to remember her candy test more...hey what is she doing out of her room? Be right back gotta go lock her back in her room!

 

[LizzySwan1022]

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

That's basically how I felt after reading the book, I have a bunch more, but I really don't feel like torturing you with them all.

 

[pixie dust 112]

Again... anyone know what she's saying

 

[Va-bear]

You asked for it...

Genetics in relationship to the law is a subject riddled with ethical, and technical issues. Should DNA of convicted criminals be kept in a data bank? Is it okay to take DNA samples for one case, and then use them again in another? David Lazer’s DNA and the Criminal Justice System discusses these topics along with others pertaining to the subject of genetics in connection to solving criminal investigations.
I believe that the UN should allocate funds towards genetic databases, research, and equipment in countries, which could otherwise not afford it. In regards to the Innocence Project in 2000 Peter Neufeld said, “One attorney… had a position that thousands of innocent people are in jail because of DNA typing. That same attorney has this position—thousands of innocent people are in jail because of no DNA typing.” In under privileged countries where stereotypes often serve as the basis for guilt and innocence in a trial, it would be beneficial to have the valuable DNA equipment we have in the United States and Great Britain today. Unfortunately innocent people are also in jail do to DNA typing. DNA typing can tell us who was at a murder, but it cannot tell us who committed the murder. However it takes a very skilled criminal to leave no trace of DNA.
Many people argue that a DNA database would be a violation of privacy, and the fourth amendment. However others argue that by committing a serious crime, such as rape, you forfeit your fourth amendment rights. The big problem with DNA databases is that they can cause as many problems as they solve. For instance if an insurance company got a hold of a person’s genetic profile, they could isolate the genes which make a person more likely to have a heart attack, and push that person’s rates higher. It is still my firm belief that with proper security a nation-wide if not worldwide database would be beneficial in dealing with crimes on a global scale.
Supreme Court justice Stephen Breyer reminds us that those in the courtroom do not always understand the complex sciences at work during cases where genetic evidence is involved, “Since the implications of our legal decisions in the real world often can and should play a role in these decisions, the clearer our understanding of the relevant science, the better. But I repeat: We are not scientists; hence the dilemma.” Even if a judge does not understand how a genetic profile is derived, they understand that it is unmistakable evidence that a certain person was at a crime scene.
DNA is a much more reliable source than fingerprinting. Case in point, the Rojas case in Argentina in 1892. Two young children were murdered, and the original suspect was the mother’s suitor, Velasquez. Torture, which was a standard practice at that point in time failed to extract a confession from Velasquez. After the failed torture attempts, detectives examined the crime scene for fingerprints, finding one bloody fingerprint, which matched the victims’ mother. When confronted with the evidence, Rojas confessed. Still, the bloody fingerprint would not have been proof without a confession, seeing that Rojas could have touched the bodies. Fingerprinting is still useful, but not as concrete as DNA.
In Washington v. State, the Supreme Court of Florida determined that the authorities can trick a suspect into providing a DNA sample by claiming that the sample is for a different case. When Alice Berdat was murdered in her bedroom, the investigator suspected Anthony Washington. The investigator did not let on that he suspected Washington, when he solicited him for a DNA sample for an unrelated case. When Washington tried to stop the state from using samples in the investigation, the court denied the motion, and Washington was arrested on charges of murder, burglary, and sexual battery. Some feel that tricking a person into providing a DNA sample for a case other than what is specified when attaining the sample in unethical. I feel that trickery is in general unethical, but there is an exception to the rule when you are tricking a potentially dangerous criminal into providing a sample for an investigation.
DNA typing is not an easy process. Different types of tests must be used in different scenarios. For example Y-STR analysis is useful for identifying victims of mass disasters. However Y-STR is completely useless in other scenarios.
The only place where fingerprinting is superior to DNA analysis is when a case involves identical twins, whose genetic make-up is the same, but who have different fingerprints. Genetics are complex. It is necessary to remember that only two percent of the human genome differentiates enough for use in forensic investigations. But genetics are also extremely accurate in pinpointing a criminal when there are many suspects.

- wow, am I at work today ,or what?! Ohcourse, I do me some DNA!!!!

 

[stinkerbelle's mom]

Oh you do not! You're such a liar, and if you do than I can post some seriously embarassing pics if I want

Tsk Tsk, never call Mommy Dearest names especially in front of company! Atleast wait until after your trip! No telling what kind of things she'll decide to bring up or worse show to your friends! Be very careful grasshopper!