PaulaSue said:
Do they make girls cut their hair to wear uniforms or just boys?
To my knowledge, no. I've not seen anywhere that I've been that makes girls cut their hair (uniforms or not)
java said:
And I do think my big issue with this is that I feel like they are telling me how to parent.
I don't really see how this is telling you how to be a parent? I'm open for an explanation and not saying "you're wrong, I'm right." But you can still buy your kids whatever kind of clothes you want. They can still wear them to town, to shop, to church, anywere, but school, right? Again, I see both sides of this issue as a teacher and parent, and I think there are some reasons against them, but I just don't get how it telling you how to be a parent.
java said:
And perhaps if this would have been a vote I would not be as offended. It is the mandate by the school board that I have issue with. This is public school! Gosh I guess I am much more liberal than I thought. ...it has everything to do with the way the girls are dressing. But I thought that is why there is a dress code? Enforce that and there would not be need for uniforms.
mytwotinks said:
It just isn't possible to spend time every day going over every students outfit to make sure it is appropriate.
You are correct mytwotinks. I teach at a public high school and try as I might, I'm positive that every day dress code violations get by me. It's not as easy as just saying "enforce." It is much more difficult than that and kids (girls) learn how to pull their shirts in a manner that just barely meets dress code, but when they are in the hall/at lunch/etc you see LOTS of skin.
babiesX2 said:
Around here you could buy the uniforms at Gap Kids, Dillard's, Stage, Wal-Mart, K-Mart, Goodwill, etc. It did nothing to equalize the kids. The kids who wore nice, expensive regular clothes before wore nice, expensive uniforms. That miffed some people off because their kids still weren't "equal" to the "rich" kids.
This was incorrectly called a uniform then. You can not shop everywhere for a uniform. Sounds like you had a standardized dress that still had very loose rules. My brothers went to a junior high that had "standardized dress." It did not require a specific name brand like a uniform, but it required khaki pants/skirts and certain color choices of polo shirts. They could be any brand name, but could not show any labels/identifiers on the exterior of the clothing.
kmccain said:
How many lawyers all wear the same exact suit and is that suit appropriate for your auto mechanic?
yes, a lawyer wears a suit, a auto mechanic wears coveralls, our children's jobs are to be students, and as they turn into teenagers many will likely have part time jobs that require uniforms. And when they are expressing themselves in many of their extracurricular activities, they are volunteering to wear uniforms, can you imagine a football player saying he isn't going to look like everyone else tonight and wear his uniform? Or the marcher in the band that says he wants to be an individual tonight? How about the choir member or even the debater who has to wear a suit every weekend? (All of these give students ways to express themselves and in my opinion are much better ways to do so than their clothing) We, adults and students, volunteer to wear uniforms all the time. Whether we like it or not, uniforms are a big part of life...Not really that big of a deal. (Just my opinion)
kmccain said:
JAVA I have to say I am with you!
Our school was thinking about going with them for the same reason posted. I think a little discipline is what is needed here. Where are the parents when they go out the door. Granted they can and do change when they get to school. Uniforms just make the principal's job easier. I think they get paid plenty of money. It won't hurt them to discipline the abusers and leave the other kids alone!
Parents frequently don't see anything wrong with their children's clothing. All parents are not as attentive as others to these type of details. Others wear it themselves so see no reason for their kids not to. The principal can not look at every child every day. I'm sure in most cases (I know at each of the school's I've been at), the principal doesn't even see a kid unless a teacher sends them to the office so I think you're placing the blame in the wrong place with the principal. (And you might be surprised with what they make. We just had an issue where I live where the teachers got state mandated raises, but not administrators. We now have teachers who will make more than the principal).
Again, these are just my opinions from inside the school system. But I'm also a parent, and in both capacities, I'm not pushing either way. In reality, I really don't care if we have them or not.