I don't have a problem with the PTA trying to raise money by selling various things. The kids are not asked to sell, the parents are, and they can choose not to participate for whatever reason, there are no required minimums. What I do have a problem with is rewarding the children of the highest selling parents in front of the entire school. One of the elementary schools (gr k thru 4) had a magician do a show today. Before the show a list of names was read over the PA, those children were announced as the highest sellers and asked to come to the gym early. When the rest of the school arrived, those kids were sitting directly in front of the stage. They were each wearing a special tag, and there was about 8 of those kids who were further honored as VIP's. The principal and PTA president made a big deal of the special kids and told how great they were for all the orders they brought in. During the show the magician picked kids to come up and assist him. He was allowed to ONLY choose kids with the special tags. Any balloon animals or other little things made during the show were given to ONLY those special tag kids. After the show was ended, the VIP kids were brought up on stage and it was announced that they would have a special show with the magician, just for them, and that they would be allowed to do something with the birds he had used during the show.
I guess my issue is the way this was done. The kids did nothing to be honored this way, the parents did all the selling. Many of the families in the school simply are not in a position to sell fundraisers. Now we have kids asking why they couldn't get a special tag or stay for the special show. What do we tell them, your family can't afford to buy all that stuff? Or your parents can't take the book to the mill, they don't work in a big office building in the city so they can't hit up all their coworkers? Sorry, your grandparents can't afford to buy all that stuff either? Maybe if there had been a private show or something for the winning kids, it wouldn't have bugged me so much. I just didn't like the way these kids were singled out for something they didn't do, in front of all the other kids, who also had nothing to do with their parents decision to sell or not sell.
I guess my issue is the way this was done. The kids did nothing to be honored this way, the parents did all the selling. Many of the families in the school simply are not in a position to sell fundraisers. Now we have kids asking why they couldn't get a special tag or stay for the special show. What do we tell them, your family can't afford to buy all that stuff? Or your parents can't take the book to the mill, they don't work in a big office building in the city so they can't hit up all their coworkers? Sorry, your grandparents can't afford to buy all that stuff either? Maybe if there had been a private show or something for the winning kids, it wouldn't have bugged me so much. I just didn't like the way these kids were singled out for something they didn't do, in front of all the other kids, who also had nothing to do with their parents decision to sell or not sell.
it shows how much of a profit the companies make with young children as free labor
)