bumbershoot
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 69,750
It's just that there is no generic made yet, for albuterol. So it's not there to choose. But just because of that, I think it's silly for the insurance company to not pay all they would if there were one.
But then...I read the insurance gripe threads, and often feel like "well they are a business and they are trying to keep costs down and make sure the "normal" choices are being made..."
But on the other hand, United Health paid for it without a problem when I was pregnant, and they are way smaller (I assume) than Aetna is.
And even though albuterol has, in the past, made me insane*, it was chosen originally for me (in 2003) because it's the safest while pregnant. And since hope springs eternal, I figure it's best to use that. AND it makes sense to use something that is safest while pregnant, even while not pregnant!
So if it's safEST** and effective, it's not experimental or off-label use, what's their problem with it?
*I haven't had an inhaler prescribed since they were using CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) as the propellant. When I last used an inhaler, it made me crazy. I mean, homicidal feelings, holding on by a thread, OK I can breath but now I want to push the red "nuclear" button feelings.
But this time, it hasn't happened. I did use the old inhaler for about a year post-pregnancy, so it's not the pregnancy itself changing my reaction. Therefore, I wonder if it was actually the propellant that caused that reaction?
Very interesting to me.
I'd forgotten that Flovent gives me a nasty stomachache. Oh I hate being on these things.
**safEST. something that has cranioschisys as a possible problem, including cleft palate, etc, isn't *safe* per se. I would love to know the mechanism by which something that opens airways can cause clefts in the facial bones....
But then...I read the insurance gripe threads, and often feel like "well they are a business and they are trying to keep costs down and make sure the "normal" choices are being made..."
But on the other hand, United Health paid for it without a problem when I was pregnant, and they are way smaller (I assume) than Aetna is.
And even though albuterol has, in the past, made me insane*, it was chosen originally for me (in 2003) because it's the safest while pregnant. And since hope springs eternal, I figure it's best to use that. AND it makes sense to use something that is safest while pregnant, even while not pregnant!
So if it's safEST** and effective, it's not experimental or off-label use, what's their problem with it?
*I haven't had an inhaler prescribed since they were using CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons) as the propellant. When I last used an inhaler, it made me crazy. I mean, homicidal feelings, holding on by a thread, OK I can breath but now I want to push the red "nuclear" button feelings.
But this time, it hasn't happened. I did use the old inhaler for about a year post-pregnancy, so it's not the pregnancy itself changing my reaction. Therefore, I wonder if it was actually the propellant that caused that reaction?
Very interesting to me.
I'd forgotten that Flovent gives me a nasty stomachache. Oh I hate being on these things.
**safEST. something that has cranioschisys as a possible problem, including cleft palate, etc, isn't *safe* per se. I would love to know the mechanism by which something that opens airways can cause clefts in the facial bones....