dancin'girl
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2008
- Messages
- 668
Maybe Regina hired him to re-write the ending!
Ooo, that's a good one! I like this theory. Maybe after he reads the book, he'll start to believe, too?
Maybe Regina hired him to re-write the ending!
I keep wondering where that dagger is... I know someone said it earlier - but we need to work on a time line!
I swear I saw it in Mr. Gold's shop. I could very well be wrong. I'll have to go back and watch that episode.
The previous "dark one" clearly wanted to be free of the control of the dagger because he was being used for horrible purposes (can you imagine having to torture a parent for trying to stop someone from taking their teenage daughter). Rumple has been very honest with everyone he interacts with as far as the price of magic - but he also has no qualms waving temptation under their noses. I love him but I would still like to know why he blasted Cinderella's Fairy Godmother to bits.
Me too! I want to know why he wanted that magic wand.
Maybe the show will end with some sort of course-correction...
One thing that bothers me about the writers from LOST is that they LOVED writing amazing wonderful characters that you fell in love with and then abruptly killing them... They did that with Graham and I am hoping that they won't do it as often as they did in LOST.
I think that will be interesting. There was a really great theory that circulated about the deaths on the island on LOST...that once you served your purpose on the island you died. I'm with you, I hope they don't start killing off a lot characters on this show, but they've kind of set up the precedent of those who begin to breakthrough the curse die. Not to mention what the Blue Fairy said to Jiminy back in his episode.
I had just gotten done telling my husband that MM and David can't kiss for ages because when they kiss they will remember and it is awfully early in the series for that to happen and then WHAM they lock lips! This makes me wonder if the potion that Snow took in FL had some after effect. Also - maybe the Queen took extra precautions with this curse because her other curse had been broken with 'a simple kiss'.
I think a strong connection Emma is the catalyst for people to remember who they are. Graham kissed her because he wanted to feel something for her and he remembered. Mary Margaret picked up the baby blanket and something happened, but we don't know what. It is kind of like the last season of LOST where people had to have something drastic happen to them in the sideways world for them to know it was time to move on.
Actually, I was wondering whether Sidney was sent by the Mayor to double-cross Emma, and that it was all a setup.
Tonights episode was a good one. I'm watching it a second time. That EQ is so devious. And when will Emma ever learn that whenever she sinks to Regina's level it will only blow up in her face? Do playgrounds really cost $50000? Every episode only brings more questions and just makes me want more.
OK, so now mystery man has Henry's book. How did he get it, and what the heck is he going to do with it? Any thoughts?
Wow, no one is commenting on tonight's show?
It was so transparent for me.
I knew she (EQ) was using him.
I knew Emma was being tricked.
There was something about last night's episode that really bugged me. It was so transparent from the beginning that Regina and Sydney were setting up Emma. IIRC, from one of the earliest episodes, Emma told someone (Henry, I think?) that she could tell when someone was lying to her. If that's true, then where was that talent last night? How come she couldn't tell that Sydney was lying to her?
Do you think Regina gave him the book? Sydney said he had been watching Henry and Emma. Maybe Sydney saw Henry bury it and told Regina.![]()
Maybe Regina hired him to re-write the ending!
There was something about last night's episode that really bugged me. It was so transparent from the beginning that Regina and Sydney were setting up Emma. IIRC, from one of the earliest episodes, Emma told someone (Henry, I think?) that she could tell when someone was lying to her. If that's true, then where was that talent last night? How come she couldn't tell that Sydney was lying to her?
My only hope is that Emma did realize, is on to him and will double cross him. It just seems inconsistent with her character to not be suspicious of Sydney and blindly believe him. She used to be a bail bondswoman, for pete's sake. She's supposed to be suspicious and not fall for things so easily!
I don't post much on this thread or others like it because I learned my lesson with Lost. I got so caught up in finding answers to questions and reading into every little thing about the Lost episodes that I realized I wasn't watching out of pure enjoyment anymore. So, I'm staying out of the theory discussions here because I don't want that to happen with OUAT.But with that being said, here I go again!
There was something about last night's episode that really bugged me. It was so transparent from the beginning that Regina and Sydney were setting up Emma. IIRC, from one of the earliest episodes, Emma told someone (Henry, I think?) that she could tell when someone was lying to her. If that's true, then where was that talent last night? How come she couldn't tell that Sydney was lying to her?
My only hope is that Emma did realize, is on to him and will double cross him. It just seems inconsistent with her character to not be suspicious of Sydney and blindly believe him. She used to be a bail bondswoman, for pete's sake. She's supposed to be suspicious and not fall for things so easily!
And FWIW, I don't think Sydney is the love that the EQ lost due to Snow White. He was simply someone she used to get what she wanted. The nice EQ was just an act. Her evil runs to the soul and she's only capable of being nice when she wants something.
I think when the mirror asked the EQ if Snow suspected her of her father's death, I think it was just out of curiousity or just to gauge the relationship between the 2. I don't think he had any other reason to ask, other than curiousity.
Wasn't the ring a symbol of true love?
True love followed the ring or something like that....
Yes, so it wasn't a symbol of marriage but one of true love.
If I remember correctly the ring supposedly finds your true love, it doesn't make you love someone, it helps you find them.
Just to throw a monkey wrench in the discussion. It sounds like Charming's mother intended for him to give the ring to Abigail. As she was taking the ring off she said, "Give this to your wife-to-be." Charming objected, and said, "I don't love her, I don't even know her." His mom insisted, "Just because you don't know her, doesn't mean you won't grow to love her."
"True love follows this ring wherever it goes, my son."
She goes on to say that she had love with his father, and love with him and she wants him to take the ring because as long as he has it, "I'll know you'll find love. I'll know you'll be happy"
Maybe the ring does have some magic properties but I don't like the idea that the romance between Snow and Charming is just a trick of the ring. If she hadn't put it on in the woods he would have given it to Abigail and been just as much in love with her? I could be wrong but that doesn't sound anything like "true love" to me.
How is Rumpel supposed to be the beast? That doesn't make sense to me. Was this a spoiler somewhere I missed? Wasn't the beast supposed to be a Prince put under a spell for being unkind? Rumpel was supposed to be a peasant of some kind I thought.
Well .....he blew away Cinderella's fairy godmother so why wouldn't he do the same thing to the beast.
Maybe I misunderstood. I thought PP-ers were saying that Rumpel was supposed to be the beast (AKA play the part/role of the beast) in the upcoming episode where Beauty is supposed to make her appearance.
im sure there are a bunch of genies running around fairytale land