Once again, a school, a shooter....and we do the drill yet again.....

I think it is wishful thinking that mass shootings would be reduced with that legislation. It is feel good legislation at best.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/16/us/politics/legal-gun-purchase-mass-shooting.html



77% will continue to follow the law up until the point they kill and 23% will continue to break the law up until the point they kill.

Yes, let's not even try, because universal background checks that a majority of Americans are in favor of might not help enough.


https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/06/04/upshot/mass-shooting-gun-laws.html
"If the key gun control proposals now being considered in Congress had been law since 1999, four gunmen younger than 21 would have been blocked from legally buying the rifles they used in mass shootings.
At least four other assailants would have been subject to a required background check, instead of slipping through a loophole. Ten might have been unable to steal their weapons because of efforts to require or encourage safer gun storage. And 20 might not have been allowed to legally purchase the large-capacity magazines that they used to upgrade their guns, helping them kill, on average, 16 people each."
 
Believe me, many DO have problems with those restrictions already. What you're hearing is the argument to not add MORE to what's already out there. It's been said before and it'll be said again, laws will keep the honest and safe owners in check. Those looking to commit crimes (armed or not) will find ways to get them. Even when safe gun owners properly lock and store their guns, they still get stolen. Can't blame just the homeowners either, a few years ago a local National Guard Armory was broken into and LOTS of firearms went missing. Criminals don't follow or obey laws.
So MANY people have problems with keeping people from owning missile launchers? I mean, that's a limit on "arms", is it not?

A HUGE problem with this debate is neither side is willing to compromise even the slightest inch. One side would love for all guns to be outlawed and the other wants no limitations whatsoever. The VAST majority of people are somewhere in the middle. However, the vocal minority (on both sides) is what gets all of the attention.
 
The problem is, gun advocates and lobbyists constantly change the talking point so it is never an easy, forgive my pun, target to hit. It is done deliberately and the only way around it would be for those in power to actually grow some balls and mandate it.

As soon as people start talking about restricting the type of guns, advocates state it is a mental health issue... yet we refuse to do anything about universal health care which they refuse to entertain... because communism apparently.

Then we start going down that road of at least get evaluated first by a doctor. Advocates don't want people to have to get evaluated because those with PTSD, depression, or many common mental issues wouldn't be able to own a gun. I have many a fiend who served in the military and who are enthusiastic gun owners to say the least. A few suffer from PTSD due to the pressures of war and what they had to deal with. I respect them greatly as that is something I would have never been able to do, yet they will fight to the death for their guns.

The 2nd Amendment, at the time it was written, was to have a weapon that fired 1 MAYBE 2 shots a minute if you could reload fast. Our forefathers could have never predicted what we have to deal with now.
 
One side would love for all guns to be outlawed and the other wants no limitations whatsoever.

I don't really think that's true at all. I think that's just the narrative that gets pushed by both sides as a fear mongering tactic. "Can't vote for them - they'll take away all your guns! Good luck feeding your family, they're going to turn you all vegan!" versus "If you vote for them, all your neighbors are going to own machine guns and tanks!"

I think we could get something done as a country if corporations and lobbyists were banned from making contributions to campaigns.
 

As soon as people start talking about restricting the type of guns, advocates state it is a mental health issue... yet we refuse to do anything about universal health care which they refuse to entertain... because communism apparently.
Those claiming "it's all because of guns" are equally wrong. It's no one issue. No single solution will solve this. We need to look at building security. We need to look at guns. We need to look at mental health.

WE NEED TO LOOK AT HOW PEOPLE TREAT EACH OTHER. Everything (and it's evident just on this message board) is black and white/I'm right, you're wrong. There is no compromise anymore. Why is that?
 
I don't really think that's true at all. I think that's just the narrative that gets pushed by both sides as a fear mongering tactic. "Can't vote for them - they'll take away all your guns! Good luck feeding your family, they're going to turn you all vegan!" versus "If you vote for them, all your neighbors are going to own machine guns and tanks!"

I think we could get something done as a country if corporations and lobbyists were banned from making contributions to campaigns.
So you don't think there's anyone advocating to outlaw ALL guns? I said in the very next sentence (that you neglected to quote) that the vast majority of people fall in the middle. Why did you leave that part out of my quote?
 
👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

I get that, but those things can be reversed. My kid being shot can't. It was a nice break from that stress. And, my kids did very well with it, and have not had issues, so I have not struggled with the other side, that I know other people have.

I have said for years, someone going into the profession of therapy, counseling, etc. will be set with a job forever thanks to the environment we all live in..

Yeah, I am always looking over my shoulder at those places, too, and do not go to theaters to see movies anymore, anyway (not just the shootings...which, yes, just this summer happened at my local theater, too). To be fair, I have always been a person who is leery of "the general public" so this doesn't just come from the horrible acts we have noticed an uptick in over the years, but it surely doesn't help. I always scope out exits, hiding spots, etc. when we go somewhere. Gotta love an anxious mind!

Yes, there has....to all the questions. No shootings in 2020, or when I kept my kids home into 2021, but I believe there were 4 or 5 lockdowns at school since the Covid lockdowns ended, all for gun issues. There were 2, I think, before Covid, when my older son started his sophomore year there. There were less lockdowns at the inner city high school, in the thick of a rough, rough, rough neighborhood where my oldest went for freshman year, than there have been at the suburban, sweet little neighborhood school they have attended for the last few years. End of school year last year involved the school going on lockdown, and cops and dogs swarming all the classrooms and then dragging out a few kids who had loaded guns on them.

The lockdown of schools did not affect MY HOUSEHOLD in any negative ways, at all. It was good for all of us to get that time together, we learned how to learn AND teach differently, I got time to really spend with my kids, they got a hot, leisurely breakfast, nutritious lunch, no rushing out the door, and nobody having to do any lockdown drills - whether for practice or for real!

I know a lot of people did not get the same experience I did - whether because of parents that had to work outside the home, learning styles clashing, or no safe home to learn in.

All I am saying is, for my kids, my anxiety, my situation....yep, my kids being home on lockdown did not affect any of us negatively. And, I would love to have that same security each day. If my kid asked to go back to virtual learning (which we offer, 100% for anyone who wants it), I would allow it in a heartbeat.

I guess I find it weird if parents DON'T think it can happen where their kids are each day - maybe not dwell on it, but know that it is a possibility and not try and do everything they can to prevent it...
Yes, experiences across the county were so different with lockdowns. We are in a safe, rural community. And, while I know there is always a possibility of something happening in the school (yes, we are so small elementary, MS and HS are all in one building), it definitely does not cause excessive worry. They do have lockdown drills, have one central entrance (there used to be multiple) and have an armed officer at the school every day. There have been a couple instances of knives being brought to school. I think the small nature of the school allows for staff to monitor students for signs that something is not right more easily. In your situation, I would most definitely feel differently! I grew up in the south suburbs of Chicago and I can't imagine how much worse it is today. We had kids bringing guns and knives to school back then. I guess that is one of the reasons I wanted a smaller school for my kids. Thank you for responding with so much detail.
 
So you don't think there's anyone advocating to outlaw ALL guns? I said in the very next sentence (that you neglected to quote) that the vast majority of people fall in the middle. Why did you leave that part out of my quote?
Because I thought you were mostly referring to politicians as one side or the other. That's what I was responding to. I think those who are calling for a full ban or no restrictions are absolute outliers.

I didn't take the next part of your quote because I didn't think that was debatable. Most people do support universal background checks, etc.

I apologize if I misrepresented you, it was unintentional.
 
So MANY people have problems with keeping people from owning missile launchers? I mean, that's a limit on "arms", is it not?

A HUGE problem with this debate is neither side is willing to compromise even the slightest inch. One side would love for all guns to be outlawed and the other wants no limitations whatsoever. The VAST majority of people are somewhere in the middle. However, the vocal minority (on both sides) is what gets all of the attention.

1666880377076.png
 
I can answer this question - yes, there has been a shooting in a neighboring school. April 20, 1999, two shooters entered a school near my school. The school was Columbine HS. Maybe you've heard of it.

One of the teachers I taught with for several years was a senior and in the library that day. You could ask her her feelings as well. A good family friend was a teacher at Columbine. He ate lunch with Dave Sanders every day, except April 20,1999. He decided to take the day off and go to the mountains with family that was in town. Ask him about the survivor's guilt.

Let's face it, the lockdown was horrible but necessary. We did return to in-person August 2020 with the option of online or in-person. Over 50% of our parents chose online because they saw what COVID did to their families as well as our community.

As a retired teacher, I see what COVID did to students from losing a parent, both parents, other family members, as well as losing time in school. But I also have seen the results of what happens when a school shooting hits a community. Both are sad situations.
This is very sad, indeed! I can't imagine having a Columbine situation close to where my kids go to school. I would have a different perspective for sure.

As for covid, our school district opened in Aug 2020 with an optional online option. There were less than 10% that took the online option. The damage from lockdowns for most kids was worse than the risk of covid. We differ in opinions on if the school covid lockdown was necessary. I won't say more because I will end up getting points....lol.
 
Not what I said at all.

I do think it is a waste of resources to pursue legislation that has little hope to make a difference when the resources could be better spent on getting more effective laws passed.

It doesn't seem like it should take major resources to pass something that a majority of Americans are in favor of, and to implement something that a handful of states already have done, and for which there is already a structure in place to conduct said background checks.

I bet the families of the victims of the 4 shootings referenced in the article I posted, where the assailant made use of background check loopholes to obtain a weapon would disagree that it wouldn't have made a difference.
 
It amazes me when I hear about how these people were loners, with no friends, etc., like that somehow makes it understandable.
I just retired after teaching for 30 years. The number of "loners" has increased exponentially -- and kids with "anxiety" has increased as well. In general, kids seem to have "buddies" with whom they chat in class -- but not good friends like they had back when I was a new teacher. In general, kids don't talk to one another, don't hang around after school together, and have lesser social skills than they did back when I was a new teacher. Lots of kids sit alone at lunch (often a whole table is "sitting alone" together) watching this-or-that on their phones; I have come upon kids hiding in various spots around the building rather than going to lunch.

This is all very concerning.
teachers have bought escape ladders with their own money, unscrewed window hinges so they open more, bought shades for their windows, and made special doorstops that work on our waxed floors.
Yes, a speaker at an Active Shooter Drill suggested that each of us consider our spot in the school and determine how we would behave if we were alone our room when a shooter came in ... and how we would protect our students. Every one of us had multiple things "at the ready" ... all legal things but things that could be used in case of a shooter. But WHY is this an individual teachers' responsibility?

One of my teaching colleagues had one of the worst possible situations occur: This was 25-30 years ago, but a student in her classroom pulled out a gun. (All the trainers have told us, if the gun is IN YOUR CLASSROOM, you just don't have good choices.) In her case, the student sat quietly at his desk, as if he didn't know what he should do with the gun. She told the other students to leave the room -- I doubt they needed much encouragement. She left the room. The student stayed in the room and killed himself. I honestly don't know if I could've handled it as well as she did.
You will not deter criminals nor will you stop them from carrying guns. It's way deeper than a law abiding citizen carrying. Problem... nobody wants to tackle those issues.
Absolutely. It's part availability of guns, part mental illness, part lack of parenting and social media. It's part violence on TV, in video games and music. It's lots of anger and disconnectedness from others.

BUT I don't want guns to be taken away ... used properly, guns are useful. We shoot nasty coyotes on our land -- they definitely want to hurt my dogs, and they might even come after my small nieces, nephews and grandson.

My brother (ex-military) carries a gun while he works, and THREE TIMES pulling out that gun has prevented him from being robbed (maybe worse). Once at a gas station, once at his office late-late at night, once on a remote job site. He jokes that bad guys with bad intentions can run like Usain Bolt when he pulls out that gun. My brother is an example of positive gun ownership ... and he's the majority.

Having said that, I think gun ownership laws are too lax. I have to renew my driver's license every few years -- but once I own a gun, it's mine for life. Similarly, my husband owns a bunch of guns. If he dies, they're mine, even though I've never been vetted as a safe gun owner.
This is a multi-faceted problem. Anyone who points to a single solution and says "THIS will stop mass shootings" IMO has blinders on.
Agree. People are complex. Their choices aren't based upon any one issue.
Did you ever wonder why there weren't mass school shootings 50 years ago?
Just to be difficult, I'll point out that we did have Get-Under-Your-Desk-Because-Russia-Is-Going-To-Bomb-Us drills when I was in elementary school in the early 70s. I was very afraid during those drills and genuinely expected that one day it would happen.
Really we had a nasty thread about this. Kids do have values. Are you really implying all kids don't have values?
Are you not teaching your kids values?
All human beings have values - we, the majority, just don't like some people's values.

For example, "Get what you want at any cost, and if someone gets hurt, too bad for the weak" IS a value. "If someone insults you, hit him, shoot him, make him bleed" IS a value. "People of this race deserve to be shot" IS a value. "Drugs are okay -- anyone who says otherwise just doesn't want us to have any fun" IS a value.

The vast majority of us don't agree with these values, but they ARE still guiding principles that some kids hold these close to their hearts.
Wow. I didn't realize there were so many.
I've been going to Active Shooter Trainings in school for probably a decade (as I said, I just retired, so I haven't been to one this year), and something the speaker told us: The most common school is not a Columbine-type angry student in the halls shooting indiscriminately. Rather, the most common shooting occurs in the parking lot after school; it occurs between 2-4 people who know each other /hate each other /are specifically targeting one another. More often than not, drugs are involved. So those numbers are kinda misleading. Don't get me wrong -- even one shooting is too many, and it's entirely possible that your innocent honors student could be injured /killed just by being in that same parking lot. But recognize what is the most common "school shooting".

Other things I learned /really stuck with me from those trainings:
- We hear about school shootings -- in part because we have a deep-seated belief that school /children should be safe -- but most shootings happen in businesses. Last year we had a shooting at the grocery store right by my school -- it was exactly what I've been told is "the most common school shooting" -- a couple thug-kids who had a beef over drugs, and one ended up shot twice. The really bad thing: he came back to school meaner than ever, as if he were thinking, "I've been shot now. I'm one of the real tough guys." He learned nothing from the experience.

- The trainers emphasized to us that if we're in a business place and a shooting happens, we should not try to exit through the main door -- though it is human nature to try to do so. Chances are the shooter is at the main door. He says run through the back /through the employee areas -- for example, at a grocery store, go into the area where they keep all the crates. He said we should seriously look at the places we shop often and think, "What would I do? Where would I go?" I thought this to be excellent advice.

- The trainers emphasized that if the police are there, taking charge of the situation, DO NOT have a phone in your hand. They emphasized that even the police are on edge during this type of situation, and a phone can "flash metal" and look like a gun. The police are on the lookout for a shooter trying to blend in with the victims, and you do not want to look like you're holding a gun -- in a split second, that could get you shot by a police officer. He says, once the police are there, put your hands in the air so it's clear you're not a danger. I would not have thought that on my own.
 
Last edited:
It doesn't seem like it should take major resources to pass something that a majority of Americans are in favor of, and to implement something that a handful of states already have done, and for which there is already a structure in place to conduct said background checks.

I bet the families of the victims of the 4 shootings referenced in the article I posted, where the assailant made use of background check loopholes to obtain a weapon would disagree that it wouldn't have made a difference.
It takes major resources to get anything passed.

Political capital is spent and accumulated which greatly impacts future ability to pass laws.
 
It takes major resources to get anything passed.

Political capital is spent and accumulated which greatly impacts future ability to pass laws.

OK. I'm still in the camp of 'I'd rather try something than nothing.' And universal background checks poll as having a majority of Americans in favor. And, there are instances where a mass shooting occurred with a weapon obtained that way. Might the perpetrator have just obtained a weapon another way? Maybe. But maybe not.
 
Not bereeen this current shooting and last, but yes, between this current shooting and today. I early voted on Tuesday.
Because my knowledge of the US political system is very limited, how does early voting make a difference? Or is the voting in general?
 
OK. I'm still in the camp of 'I'd rather try something than nothing.' And universal background checks poll as having a majority of Americans in favor. And, there are instances where a mass shooting occurred with a weapon obtained that way. Might the perpetrator have just obtained a weapon another way? Maybe. But maybe not.
I'm not; that is, I'm not in favor of doing something for the sake of doing something. When that something isn't particularly effective -- like universal background checks -- it costs money and effort, and it "excuses" the powers that be from finding the best options. We need to do the right things.
Because my knowledge of the US political system is very limited, how does early voting make a difference? Or is the voting in general?
Voting early is the best! You can choose your date. It's not crowded, and if something should happen (like if you get sick or your car breaks down or whatever) on voting day, you've already done your part!

It "counts" exactly the same as if you'd voted on "the day".
 
Because my knowledge of the US political system is very limited, how does early voting make a difference? Or is the voting in general?

Voting early is the best! You can choose your date. It's not crowded, and if something should happen (like if you get sick or your car breaks down or whatever) on voting day, you've already done your part!

It "counts" exactly the same as if you'd voted on "the day".
Yes, that's about it.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter
Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom