seabright1 said:
That is one of my observation. The pavement/concrete area is just overpowering. To me Saratoga Springs felt somehow more like a "motel" or an "apartment complex"than a resort. Don't get me wrongthough, there are areas that are nice..like the hospitality center..but then again,whenever I am in (apartment)building I felt like I was so detatched from that nicer area (or that magical experience I felt at the other resort). For me, the build quality is also not there. I can go on and on..but maybe your experience and other
DVC member's experience will be (or was) different.
I am just stating my point of view.
seabright,
I have read quite a few of your posts regarding your opinion of SSR. I do somewhat agree with your feelings that SSR is not as "up to the same level" as the other DVC resorts. I also agree that SSR is a huge resort and is having a huge impact on the DVC membership in regards to booking; due to it's size.
I do think, DVC cut corners when building SSR to save costs and then raised the buy in cost--for DVC villas that are less than the existing DVC resorts.
We were not happy to see how DVC cut costs at SSr.
However, what I do not understand is how you can say SSR is not a resort. We find all WDW resorts to be very much resorts. This includes from the values up to the deluxe resorts, with the DVC resorts included.
How can you not consider SSR a resort is beyond my comprehension. It is most certainly a resort, and a very nice one, at that.
It may not appeal to you, which is fine, but it is still a nice resort.
I also can not understand how SSR is an apt complex with too much concerte. I can see calling SSR a condo resort, but an apt complex--I can not see it.
We recently stayed at SSR and did not find it to have too much concrete and we commented on how well grown the trees and shrubs were considering how new the resort was. That was our take on the landscaping at SSR, but YMMV.
What I really can not understand is how you can be so pro OKW and anti-SSR. We find the resorts to be very much alike. We do prefer the size of OKW's 1 br+, but for a studio we would pick SSR. We do not like not having a sofa--but when we stay in a studio it is always just 2 people.
We do like Olivias at OKW and their pool bar, but other than that we find both resorts to be pretty much the same.
They are both very alike resorts, with the same location, design, amenities, etc. Both are very nice resorts and both are very different from the park/hotel DVC resorts.
I do agree that the villas at OKW have advantages that have been cut at SSR. The silly hallways are a prefect example.
BUT, you make SSR out to be less than a roach motel on I-95; and that is far, far from the truth. It is also a very unfair and untrue impression to give to people, that are visiting this board for facts about WDW resorts.
I think everyone is very aware of your feelings regarding SSR. It is your opinion and you entitled to it. But imo, you have to make your posts regarding SSR--less personal and more factual.
BTW, we do not have SSR or OKW as our home resorts, so this is a completely unbiased opinion.