MaryAnnDVC
"Mare", DISing since '99; prefers being tagless
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2001
- Messages
- 14,950
Now, on InSession Live. I am SO enjoying seeing him looking like a scared, trapped animal. I hope he gets the maximum allowable sentence.
how soon will they announce it?
Aww, what a swell guy! Murder her mother, fight for the ring.I cant believe he had the nerve to say " I was just trying to get my wifes wedding ring back for my daughter".![]()
I don't know where I stand on this exactly - I do believe he should be punished for THIS crime - but you can't add past issues into it, and it just seems that is what everyone is doing...
I agree. Right or wrong, a jury found him not guilty of those murders. I would hate to be found 'not guilty' of a crime and then, over a decade later when found guilty of a different crime, the jury and judge decide to 'rectify' what they feel was a past mistake and load up my sentence. It has a vigilante feel to it.
I think the general public (including me), right or wrong, would like to see him pay for the crimes he got away with; natural reaction. I'm not saying that this sentence should take that into consideration. I am saying tho that I will THOROUGHLY enjoy a stiff sentence. However, it's the judge who will be sentencing him, within legal guidelines. I don't think she's chomping at the bit to "right a wrong". His lawyers stood there today and said that there's no doubt he committed the crimes, so the jury's decision was correct. And as I said, with that verdict, the judge will make the decision.I agree. Right or wrong, a jury found him not guilty of those murders. I would hate to be found 'not guilty' of a crime and then, over a decade later when found guilty of a different crime, the jury and judge decide to 'rectify' what they feel was a past mistake and load up my sentence. It has a vigilante feel to it.
how soon will they announce it?