disneyfantotheend
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2003
- Messages
- 3,527
Never heard of a selfie stick. I must be out of the loop/
I purposely didn't quote you and named "society" but if the selfie stick fits...
Wow, you've got me pegged. If I carry a selfie stick then I must be a narcissist! Oh, please.
Strollers are a necessity at a park catering to children. The only thing selfie sticks are necessary for is to feed society's narcissistic egos.
My point is - live and let live. If I'm not directly interfering with you, then leave me be. Selfie sticks aren't rude. People who use them can be rude. But not all of them.
People have reported being whacked in the ankles with strollers, too. Should we ban those? It's the people using these things that can be rude, not the things themselves.
Also, I carried my stick on every ride I went on for ten days last August. Not sure where the assertion that there is no room on rides for them comes from. I made out just fine. Do you have firsthand experience to indicate otherwise?
Using an add-on that can understandably and reasonably cause its user to block or bump somebody makes the resulting encounter intentional, not accidental. In cases such as this one, the issue isn't that the user should have known better - it's that the user does know better but continually engages in actions that can interfere with or injure the general public. That's MUCH worse than the general public accidentally causing themselves to appear in someone's pictures taken from a distance.Big dislike. Intentionally messing with other people is not cool. Much worse than someone accidentally blocking or bumping into you,even if they should have known better.
Wow, you've got me pegged. If I carry a selfie stick then I must be a narcissist! Oh, please.
I don't understand the purpose of the selfie stick on rides? Aren't you missing out on the experience? Also, if you're holding it up, aren't you blocking the view of the people behind you? or in the space of the people in front of you? I guess I have to see it to understand it, but I feel like if the person behind me was using a selfie stick above my head, I'd be tempted to stretch my arms up and accidentally knock it over.
Using an add-on that can understandably and reasonably cause its user to block or bump somebody makes the resulting encounter intentional, not accidental. In cases such as this one, the issue isn't that the user should have known better - it's that the user does know better but continually engages in actions that can interfere with or injure the general public. That's MUCH worse than the general public accidentally causing themselves to appear in someone's pictures taken from a distance.
How many pictures does one need of oneself, in any location or situation? How many images does one need of oneself that can't be taken at arm's length or by a kind stranger? More to the point - why?
These "what if my kids show up in someone else's photos" discussions are way out of my range of logic.
On the other hand, if I was in the seat behind you, I might be concerned about my face (or more importantly my kids') ending up on Youtube. In a public place like Disney though, you're bound to end up in SOMEONE's vacation pictures.
Using those stupid sticks on a ride?? What happens if you drop it? Hit somebody. Not smart.
Using those stupid sticks on a ride?? What happens if you drop it? Hit somebody. Not smart.
IMHO, we need to spend less time taking pictures and more time in the moment. No need to document the entire day to "remember the trip." If you experience the trip, you'll remember it....
It's tethered in two places, which is more than I can say for hats, sunglasses, scarves, purses, regular camera bags, backpacks, etc. If those are also banned then I would have no problem with a restriction here too.
To each their own… you experience your vacation the way you see fit, as I will with mine.