Oh me, oh my-does baby Suri really exist???update now aka "The Suri Challenge"

[Daxx]

Hahahaha!!!! V. scary!!!!!

 

[Michie]

if only everyone in this thread took their time and used it for good...

BOOOOOO!!!!!!! BOOOOOOOOO!!!

Hey, anybody watching Springer?

 

[luvmydogs]

if only everyone in this thread took their time and used it for good...

Oh, that sounds a little hyberbolic to me.

Hmmmmmm...being able to judge the goodness one does in life by what one posts on an internet MB. What a cool superpower to have!

 

[CathrynRose]

if only everyone in this thread took their time and used it for good...

.....we'd have a VERY boring board, my friend.

Posted previously - but it's time for another round:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8530918890580805143

 

[SplshMtn99]

.....we'd have a VERY boring board, my friend.

Posted previously - but it's time for another round:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8530918890580805143

OMG!!!!!! THAT'S HYSTERICAL!!!!! I've never seen that before!!!!

 

[SplshMtn99]

Here is another great picture.

Another good one. She does look pretty funny.

Hey, zurgswife, stick around. Have seen you around the DIS lately. Maybe its just that you are always at WDW. (jealous)

 

[wendyl]

if only everyone in this thread took their time and used it for good...

Ahhhhh, Play us another song, Troll!!!

 

[momof3disneyholics]

Hey, anybody watching Springer?

No, but Maury comes on in about an hour!

 

[lookingforward]

Here is another great picture.

For me, having carried three babies to term...well....there is something just not right about this picture. Abnormal and strange. Yikes!

 

[ChristmasElf]

Here is another great picture.

Who's belly is that "beach balley round" while pregnant anyway? This picture is almost too fake IMO.

 

[MosMom]

They put a beach ball there to show how her belly looks fake. The picture on the left is real, the picture on the right is to show the ball shape.

 

[Beth76]

Posted previously - but it's time for another round:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8530918890580805143

And thanks for the laugh the second time around!

 

[SplshMtn99]

OK, never having been pregnant, thus never having worn maternity clothes I have a question about her pants. They don't look right? Shouldn't they be bigger & have to go over her belly. It looks like they go UNDER the beach ball? KWIM?

I spent 6 months in a body cast as a teen.....and I know I had to buy bigger jeans to get them around the cast (waistline)...and it created a baggy area in the front of the jeans. My panties however, I was able to tuck a bit under the cast which ended below my hips.

Her pants just don't look right to me in any picture. They look like they fit like regular pants & ARE regular pants??????

ETA: Nevermind, I found these pictures of maternity jeans & I see how they ride low. http://images.google.com/images?q=maternity+jeans&ie=ISO-8859-1&hl=en&btnG=Search+Images
It still just looks WEIRD to me.

 

[RadioNate]

if only everyone in this thread took their time and used it for good...

Hey YOU opened the thread and took time to post.

But whatever TOM, tell Katie we said hello!

 

[momrek06]

If photographers could catch Katie buying coffee, why couldn't they capture on film the "funny looking" baby that the Telluride locals "saw".

This latest "rumor" that the baby is funny-looking...does anyone think that there may be something wrong with the baby HENCE, TOM buying that ultra-sound machine months before Suri was born???

NOW LISTEN TO THIS ONE: 7/13/06 Boston Herald "Star Tracks" pg 19 has Katie Holmes pregnant AGAIN and reported that Katie's parents told MSNBC that as devout Catholics: Mr. & Mrs. Holmes will NOT be attending their daughter's upcoming wedding!!!!!

 

[Beth76]

OK, never having been pregnant, thus never having worn maternity clothes I have a question about her pants. They don't look right? Shouldn't they be bigger & have to go over her belly.

Not necessarily. A few years ago they started making under-the-belly pants. Take a look here

 

[SplshMtn99]

This latest "rumor" that the baby is funny-looking...does anyone think that there may be something wrong with the baby HENCE, TOM buying that ultra-sound machine months before Suri was born???

NOW LISTEN TO THIS ONE: 7/13/06 Boston Herald "Star Tracks" pg 19 has Katie Holmes pregnant AGAIN and reported that Katie's parents told MSNBC that as devout Catholics: Mr. & Mrs. Holmes will NOT be attending their daughter's upcoming wedding!!!!!

I saw that "pregnant again" comment under the recent COFFEE (with sweater) pictures on one of the tabloids yesterday...but I really didn't see a bump. So i didn't post it. What do you guys think? I'm FAR from a pregnancy expert having no experience.

For her sake, I hope NOT!!! Run Katie Run!!!!!!!!!!
And if she is, well then Tom has found some miraculos cure for being sterile.

 

[Andrea]

i found this online.. sorry if this has been posted this is a long thread already lol

At first it seemed like Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes didn't want their new daughter's face all over the media, but could it really be that pictures of little Suri just didn't sell? Fox News is reporting that a photo shoot of the TomKitten was offered to Wire Image, and an auction went up between other magazines such as People, Star, and US Weekly. When the auction produced no more than $3 mil, it was cancelled by Daddy Cruise himself.

So why wasn't $3 million dollars enough for baby pictures of Suri Cruise? Simply because Suri can't outdo Shiloh Jolie-Pitt, who received $4 million for her pictures with People.

A source from Fox says, "Shiloh was the whole deal. We won't see a baby like that again for a while."

 

[FSUGrad97]

I saw that "pregnant again" comment under the recent COFFEE (with sweater) pictures on one of the tabloids yesterday...but I really didn't see a bump. So i didn't post it. What do you guys think? I'm FAR from a pregnancy expert having no experience.

I didn't show with my DD until I was nearly 15 weeks pregnant, and with this baby, I started to show around 10 weeks.

It's possible that she could be pregnant and not be showing yet, especially if she just found out.

 

[SplshMtn99]

i found this online.. sorry if this has been posted this is a long thread already lol

At first it seemed like Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes didn't want their new daughter's face all over the media, but could it really be that pictures of little Suri just didn't sell? Fox News is reporting that a photo shoot of the TomKitten was offered to Wire Image, and an auction went up between other magazines such as People, Star, and US Weekly. When the auction produced no more than $3 mil, it was cancelled by Daddy Cruise himself.

So why wasn't $3 million dollars enough for baby pictures of Suri Cruise? Simply because Suri can't outdo Shiloh Jolie-Pitt, who received $4 million for her pictures with People.

A source from Fox says, "Shiloh was the whole deal. We won't see a baby like that again for a while."

Interesting, but i still don't see why a paparazzi or a Telluride resident with a cell phone can't get a picture.