Doctor P
<font color=navy><font color=navy>Chocolate covere
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2000
- Messages
- 6,550
We obviously don't have access to the contracts and numbers to truly make rational decisions in this situation other than on impressions, philosophy and personal impact. I'm sure they discussed various options and made the decision that it was best to make everyone the same. I would bet that contractually it would have been much harder to have different fees for different people and that free was actually much easier than a discounted rate. Of course one could argue to make everyone the same but at a lower rate and I'm sure that is not possible without lowering the rate at all Disney resorts. I'm sure one option was to keep the perk in place and raise the rate to more like $15 per day.If the cost for valet service was going up, why didn't DVC just change from "free" valet to a discount on valet? Why eliminate the valet perk completely?
Why go from free to $12 a day? Why not give us a reduced rate as a perk, say $5 a day for valet? Why eliminate the perk completely?
Personally for me the issue isn't valet parking. The issue is the overall "trend" of cut backs, cut backs, cut backs that I see occuring at the world. The valet parking is just one more issue.
Cuts in Fantasmic
Cuts in "live" performers (ex pre show entertainment like 4 for a dollar)
cuts in menu offering.
Any one of these things I could probably shrug my shoulders but start adding them up and my overall experience is starting to feel more like a "amusement park " and less like "a magical disneyworld" ***sighs***
We had member perks in DL as far back as 2005 when we were there because we got Portable Perks from the GC desk. I wasn't there before that, so I can't say further back or not. I don't really see the sleeper chair as a perk, but as a negative - crowding rooms that shouldn't be crowded with extra guests.
If the cost for valet service was going up, why didn't DVC just change from "free" valet to a discount on valet? Why eliminate the valet perk completely?
Why go from free to $12 a day? Why not give us a reduced rate as a perk, say $5 a day for valet? Why eliminate the perk completely?
1) OK, stupid question time.
2) Why didn't people complain when the outsourcing started?
3) Instead of complaining only when it affected them?
4) Several WDW employees were "transferred" and WDW jobs eliminated.
5) Guests/Members had to think there were going to be changes coming.
6) I am sure if we voted to raise dues, we could get free valet parking back.
NOTE: By the way, we all bought a timeshare, that's all. We did not buy a discount program. So adding/changing/eliminating perks should not be a biggie.
I'm planning to buy a TIW card on Wednesday-I'm going to check then on free valet parking.
We used our TIW card last night to get free valet at AKV while eating at Jiko. So, for the time being, it hasn't been changed.
Outsourcing doesn't always result in cheaper expense. In fact, from my experience in the corporate world, it's often the opposite. The difference is that the expense of using Disney CMs as opposed to outsourced contractors is where the expense falls on the profit & loss statement. Often times the powers that be will bring down an edict that they must reduce payroll. So what do they do, fire people and hire contractors because contractor expense falls in a different expense line item. Payroll is reduced but the cost of contractors is higher than the employees ever were. But the powers that be are happy because payroll expense is down
1) OK, stupid question time.
2) Why didn't people complain when the outsourcing started?
3) Instead of complaining only when it affected them?
4) Several WDW employees were "transferred" and WDW jobs eliminated.
5) Guests/Members had to think there were going to be changes coming.
6) I am sure if we voted to raise dues, we could get free valet parking back.
7) We bought in 1992, and have seen a lot of perks come-and-go.
NOTE: By the way, we all bought a timeshare, that's all. We did not buy a discount program. So adding/changing/eliminating perks should not be a biggie.