Sad to hear that according to Blog Mickey, these layoffs are in addition to the 28,000 announced last week.![]()
Yeah, this is a third-party operation, so it wouldn't be included in the county from Disney
Sad to hear that according to Blog Mickey, these layoffs are in addition to the 28,000 announced last week.![]()
I think people are taking this way out of proportion. The safari is still one of my top 5 rides in all of WDW (with The Land, Peoplemover, FoP, and Peter Pan). I’m just saying what would make it even better for me. Not for everyone, and I completely understand why those aspects are there. Just as someone that rides this ride probably 12-15 times a year, it can get a little tedious.Agreed. I can understand the POV of those who don’t like the “fake” elements, but those elements are intended for new visitors, or people that visit infrequently. People generally only notice these things when they’re exposed to them repeatedly. It’s an interesting thing to the newcomer, and really doesn’t detract from the experience for the frequent visitor.
If you want to just focus on the animals only, you’re free to do that. But expecting all of the elements of a Safari ride through a 100% manufactured theme park to be authentic is a bit silly, IMO.
I think it’s more because the safari would be such an amazing ride if it just focused on the animals, without the Jungle Cruise-esque spiel like @TheMaxRebo said above. I think it also gets more tired for those of us who have now been on it for years and years (and multiple times a year at that). Toning down the poacher story was a nice touch, but it’s just the same routine each visit that gets a bit old. It’s why I absolutely loved the Wild Africa Trek at AK. Gave you that up close feel with the animals, and told the true story of the termite mounds and baobob tree.
Can't say that I've ever heard of an activist investor asking a company to return LESS money to shareholders.
Dan Loeb is right; nobody is invested in DIS for the dividend. This was/is the right move.Can't say that I've ever heard of an activist investor asking a company to return LESS money to shareholders.
Anyway he's absolutely right, Disney should cut it's dividend and aggressively invest in it's business so that whenever this is over they come out stronger than ever while their competition is weakened, and they should do that in every business they compete in.
They won't, but they should.
Fox is going hard into bookmaking in their sports division.Dan Loeb is right; nobody is invested in DIS for the dividend. This was/is the right move.
They also need to be turning ESPN into a sports betting platform in every context or Divest.
edit: The old "moral" stance TWDC took against gambling is antithetical to profitability in sports. Its a joke. (yes I'm a shareholder....).
(it also looks beyond embarrassing taking a 'moral stance' on anything as DIS in 2020).
Yikes.
Right. California would have a leg to stand on if Some of Disney’s other parks weren’t open. But all of them have been without incident, right?
Except for Hong Kong yes which was more than just COVID related.Right. California would have a leg to stand on if Some of Disney’s other parks weren’t open. But all of them have been without incident, right?
I think having to layoff people is when it got ugly. I am glad that Disney is willing to fight. Even if Disney’s number one aim with this isn’t to save cast members jobs, getting the CA parks open will save the jobs of thousands of cast members.Yikes.
I understand both arguments here, but this is turning ugly pretty quickly.
I think you (and others) miss the point of the ride. Disney is not just for adults, it's for kids. Kids get a kick out of seeing Ostrich eggs and termite mounds and Baobob trees and hearing a story of going on a Safari. The Safari would NOT be better without these things for them.