TheMaxRebo
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2008
- Messages
- 27,672
So, Mr. Iger, what was the purpose in waiting six months? Were you gathering more evidence on Mr. Lasseter's "mis-steps?" Was Mr. Lasseter supposed to go through some sort of sensitivity training and he did not successfully complete it? Or, were you just waiting to see how the cultural winds would blow for the whole #MeToo movement before you reluctantly gave up one of your rainmakers?
probably some of all of those. It's easy to say they should have just fired him right away, but I am not aware of any formal complaint or legal charge against him, so for a corporation to act on one magazine story without doing any investigation/verification I don't think is appropriate/responsible either. Was it handled perfectly? No, of course not, but in the end he was removed from the situation right as the story came out and now it appears he will never be back, so even if the way they got there wasn't the best, the end result is what it should be
and I am sure part of the idea with the 6 month hiatus was to see what happens in 6 months - maybe new information come out or maybe the climate does change a bit and it would be more tolerated for him to come back in some capacity (I don't think he could ever be put in a leadership position, but perhaps they thought a consulting role or something could work over time)