Sweettears
60 years of Disney fandom and counting
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2010
- Messages
- 4,119
Looked impressive to me.Yes as in the movie the ground lights up.
Looked impressive to me.Yes as in the movie the ground lights up.
Yeah - it was probably 80-90% negative on the boards when this was announced, with a few of us saying "Just because the movie wasn't great doesn't mean the land won't be."
Even though I was one of the positive ones back then, I still suggest temporing expectations. Things look good now, but let's see what the actual qualitiy of the product is.
Yes but it did incredibly well overseas. It was a good movie but many didn't feel compelled to get crazy about it like other movies such as Star Wars or something else. My point is people aren't Avatar Cosplaying.The movie wasn't great? It's the second highest grossing movie of all time adjusted for inflation. Some people say things that make no sense
The movie wasn't great? It's the second highest grossing movie of all time adjusted for inflation. Some people say things that make no sense
When they announced it on here, I'm saying 80% of people went out of their way to say "I hated Avatar, this land is going to suck" and I (and a few others) said "Just because you don't like a movie doesn't mean the ride / land is not going to be any good."
I've never seen the movie (gasp) however given the material I was always optimistic that this would turn out to be something immersive and different. As contrasted to a Frozen overlay or such. As a PP pointed out earlier with the addition of Pandora AK has some of the most unique attractions of all the WDW parks.I've always been on record that it was a great idea. Just because the color at night (and indoors) opportunity would/could be an amazing environment. Looks they may have succeeded in that-will see if that was correct.
I'm not sure I agree with your take on classics. Snow White, Peter Pan and Pinocchio are classics in the truest sense. Just showing my age I guess.
I don't disagree. The comment made was "at least they are recognizing the classics". To the contrary they are removing what I consider classics and replacing them with relatively more recent charactersWell... It's been... what? 25 years since the movie was originally released? Any pre 2000's hit is valid to me. Hey, Disney uses the term for Tangled or Frozen for marketing purposes, and that's like 4 years ago.
The movie wasn't great? It's the second highest grossing movie of all time adjusted for inflation. Some people say things that make no sense
The movie was financially successful, but that doesn't make it great. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a hater, the movie was just fine, but being the biggest movie of all-time doesn't mean much. When they announced it on here, I'm saying 80% of people went out of their way to say "I hated Avatar, this land is going to suck" and I (and a few others) said "Just because you don't like a movie doesn't mean the ride / land is not going to be any good." I frequently used "South of The South" and "Splash Mountain". Beyond being consider racist by today's standards - Song of the South really isn't all that good. However, they took part of the story of the movie and several of the songs and turned it into one of the best Disney rides. Meanwhile, Stitch is a great movie and they converted it to an awful ride. (OK, it was a repurposed ride with Stitch squeezed it.)
However, as far as movies being big money-makers and being "great" being the same thing - I submit to you the Transformer movies are super blockbusters, and they are piles of doo-doo. (Batman v Superman is another example of a movie that made tons of money and the (8th highest grossing movie last year) and generally considered to be somewhere betweent mediocre and downright awful.
which meant the 3d effects were amazing.
You should be able to tour it when you first get on the ship (or early sometime that day). They open them up to everyone to look around before they close them down for kids only.Will do! The Star Wars update to the Oceaneer Club looks cool, unfortunately I'm just a few years over the age criteria to enter.![]()
The movie wasn't great? It's the second highest grossing movie of all time adjusted for inflation. Some people say things that make no sense
Well as others have pointed out the movie was in 3D which added to the experience. Creating this real life attraction in 3D is pretty incredible in my mind if they pull it off.I just watched the movie earlier today and thought it was really good. Is it the best movie I ever saw? No. Is it worth the watch and would I recommend it? Yes. Now that I watched the movie I think I'm going to appreciate and really understand the land better.
Well I believe the case here was it was posted inside the construction walls and someone could see it through a hole. That's why the picture isn't great. You can make out the two ride show buildings and new train track. The map is actually similar to the one micechat has been putting out but Martin Smith says there are some difference between the two.Why do these leaks always look like the picture was taken with a potato? I can't think of a single recent smartphone that would take this picture so poorly, unless the person was walking around with an LG VX9800.
Maybe the person was 200 ft away running from Disney security?
Can anyone make anything out of it?