News Round Up 2016

Is there a love button? I once had to spend 4 months disputing charges by Comcast before reporting to BBB. They got it straightened out in a week but it was still a ridiculous situation. We now pay more for ATT so we don't have to deal with Comcast.

I've learned from experience that all it takes for cable companies/ISP's to get off their butts and actually do something is tell them you are going to report them to BBB. Telling them that during the first call goes leaps and bounds. Complaining to their departments usually don't get you anywhere. However, filing something with BBB actually causes BBB to look into it. It's much less of a hassle for the company to essentially give you what you want than have to deal with that.

You made the right move. I wish these companies cared a little more. I know...the Pixie Dust must be getting to me.
 
A British film production company has been fined £1.6 million (almost $2 million) after the actor Harrison Ford broke his leg while filming a "Star Wars" movie, according to Britain's Press Association. The Disney-owned company, Foodles Production (UK) Ltd, had admitted two health and safety breaches in relation to the incident in June 2014, when Ford's leg was crushed by a hydraulic door.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/12/europe/star-wars-harrison-ford-crush-fine/index.html
 

A British film production company has been fined £1.6 million (almost $2 million) after the actor Harrison Ford broke his leg while filming a "Star Wars" movie, according to Britain's Press Association. The Disney-owned company, Foodles Production (UK) Ltd, had admitted two health and safety breaches in relation to the incident in June 2014, when Ford's leg was crushed by a hydraulic door.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/12/europe/star-wars-harrison-ford-crush-fine/index.html


They should be fined just for having a name like "Foodles".
 
Wow. While I have no attachment to the treehouse why do you want to get rid of it?

I get it, it's kind of a old school Disney attraction, cute theming, etc. But in today's Magic Kingdom, it just feels like a waste of valuable space and is inaccessible to a lot of groups (Those with strollers, wheelchairs, ECV's, etc).
 
I get it, it's kind of a old school Disney attraction, cute theming, etc. But in today's Magic Kingdom, it just feels like a waste of valuable space and is inaccessible to a lot of groups (Those with strollers, wheelchairs, ECV's, etc).
It's not a huge space they couldn't do a done there. I also get that it's inaccessible to some but I feel like it's not a hot ticket attraction anyways. It's a walk through attraction not a ride. I don't know just my take. I couldn't tell you the last time I went through it though.
 
It's not a huge space they couldn't do a done there. I also get that it's inaccessible to some but I feel like it's not a hot ticket attraction anyways. It's a walk through attraction not a ride. I don't know just my take. I couldn't tell you the last time I went through it though.

I'd rather see it just removed and open up that portion of Adventureland - that stretch between Magic Carpets of Aladdin and Sunshine Tree Terrace has always bogged up from my memory. Take down the treehouse, put a bridge there, and open up foot traffic would really help move people safely and efficiently.
 
I'd rather see it just removed and open up that portion of Adventureland - that stretch between Magic Carpets of Aladdin and Sunshine Tree Terrace has always bogged up from my memory. Take down the treehouse, put a bridge there, and open up foot traffic would really help move people safely and efficiently.
See now I say take down aladdins carpets, that created a huge bottleneck in that area.
 
See now I say take down aladdins carpets, that created a huge bottleneck in that area.

Although it did, I find Carpets (while it is a Dumbo ripoff) to be much more viable longterm in terms of crowd control. Sure, it's not the most popular attraction in the park - but it still manages to get a line in the busiest days of summer and the holiday season.

Disney would lose more removing that, than they would from removing SFTH
 
Although it did, I find Carpets (while it is a Dumbo ripoff) to be much more viable longterm in terms of crowd control. Sure, it's not the most popular attraction in the park - but it still manages to get a line in the busiest days of summer and the holiday season.

Disney would lose more removing that, than they would from removing SFTH
I get what you're saying but I don't think the treehouse causes as big of a bottleneck as the spinner does.
 
No, it doesn't cause as big of a bottleneck. But the removal of the treehouse is a better solution longterm, in terms of crowd control and dispersion, than the removal of carpets.

But I suppose we may just have to agree to disagree
 
No, it doesn't cause as big of a bottleneck. But the removal of the treehouse is a better solution longterm, in terms of crowd control and dispersion, than the removal of carpets.

But I suppose we may just have to agree to disagree
Honestly, this area isn't terribly congested. Compared to Disneyland, WDW's Adventureland is like walking in an empty parking lot. If Swiss was ever removed, chances are it would be replaced with more dining or shopping which would probably attract more foot traffic and then whatever extra space was added would be negated so why not stick with a classic attraction that has Disney spirit instead of mediocre food or the same crap items you can find in 10 different gift shops.
 
I get it, it's kind of a old school Disney attraction, cute theming, etc. But in today's Magic Kingdom, it just feels like a waste of valuable space and is inaccessible to a lot of groups (Those with strollers, wheelchairs, ECV's, etc).

Lol Stitch's great escape is a waste of space. Monsters Inc Laugh floor is a waste of space.

The tree house is not.

Besides the obvious issues of not gaining practically any meaningful new real estate, the tree house is a core part of the land's design direction. All the place making and art direction called for that forested area opposite the development. Wider pathways were never called for and would distort the art direction.

That's one of my favorite atmospheres in the park, and simply bulldozing is not called for or appropriate.

Additionally those sorts of little experiences are what sets Disney apart. You can call that ridiculous, but I like the little areas that are off the beaten path and that you can explore. It's the same basic show as the original treehouse at Disneyland, and it was done so simply and so well.

It struck the right chord with individuals. What kid (or adult) doesn't want to live in a treehouse? Especially with all that cool stuff? It resonates even today. Unlike many parks, classic Disney Parks were multilayered. The tree house is one of them.

Animal Kingdom actually follows most closely to this model on the Jungle and Falls treks. One of the reasons Disney's Animal Kingdom is fab.

@rteetz I wouldn't mind going back to the original design, in fact I'd prefer it, but now I'd say Magic Carpets is the premier spinner in the park.

What the silly people missed while doubling capacity at dumbo was it was never just about riding the Elephant. That was certainly part of it, but not all of it. It was riding the elephant next to a castle and magical realms. Now it's... Kind of anticlimactic. The place really did matter.

Magic Carpet is in a far more interesting environment. Much more enjoyable to ride now. Plus there's nostalgia from my childhood, but that can make way for design intent. It's a give and take ;)
 
Lol Stitch's great escape is a waste of space. Monsters Inc Laugh floor is a waste of space.

The tree house is not.

Besides the obvious issues of not gaining practically any meaningful new real estate, the tree house is a core part of the land's design direction. All the place making and art direction called for that forested area opposite the development. Wider pathways were never called for and would distort the art direction.

That's one of my favorite atmospheres in the park, and simply bulldozing is not called for or appropriate.

Additionally those sorts of little experiences are what sets Disney apart. You can call that ridiculous, but I like the little areas that are off the beaten path and that you can explore. It's the same basic show as the original treehouse at Disneyland, and it was done so simply and so well.

It struck the right chord with individuals. What kid (or adult) doesn't want to live in a treehouse? Especially with all that cool stuff? It resonates even today. Unlike many parks, classic Disney Parks were multilayered. The tree house is one of them.

Animal Kingdom actually follows most closely to this model on the Jungle and Falls treks. One of the reasons Disney's Animal Kingdom is fab.

@rteetz I wouldn't mind going back to the original design, in fact I'd prefer it, but now I'd say Magic Carpets is the premier spinner in the park.

What the silly people missed while doubling capacity at dumbo was it was never just about riding the Elephant. That was certainly part of it, but not all of it. It was riding the elephant next to a castle and magical realms. Now it's... Kind of anticlimactic. The place really did matter.

Magic Carpet is in a far more interesting environment. Much more enjoyable to ride now. Plus there's nostalgia from my childhood, but that can make way for design intent. It's a give and take ;)
Very well said!
 















Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE







New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top