Is this the same as the Frozen thing that is taking The Maelstrom spot? #RIP
No, this is in addition to the makeover of Maelstrom.
Is this the same as the Frozen thing that is taking The Maelstrom spot? #RIP
I agree that Disney abandoned the concept. However, I stand by my statement that new generations are not interested by that anymore. It was impressive back in the 80's when it opened. Nowadays children are not impressed by that. They want to ride attractions and meet characters. Entertainment/media/culture has changed, and being quite honest, most kids nowadays don't want to go to Disney to learn about hydroponics and new energy sources. Not saying that many kids aren't interested in that, but out of 20 kids, 5 want to learn the history of France, 15 want to ride Test Track and Soarin over and over.
With the right investment, Epcot could still be a great park in its original form even though children interests are very different if compared to the 80's. However, just like Tomorrowland, Epcot would have to update its rides every 5 years, given the rate at which technology is changing and the fact that we are reaching the future we once thought was still pretty far away.
That doesn't mean that the entire concept of the Experimental Prototype Community of Tomorrow should be dropped though.
To me, it's not even worth arguing whether the changes at Epcot are because
A) The public isn't interested in the concept of the park as it existed at opening (let alone in the mind's eye of a certain someone)
or
B) Disney decided not to spend cash/imagination on upkeep/improvements.
The truth is that both of those realities make me sad.
I do, and I realize that they redid the Mexico ride to add Donald, and the world still spins on its axis.
I'm curious how they'll repurpose a massive M&G building when the Frozen lines fade. That's a huge facility for new characters.
While you make a valid point about the airfareCome on Planogirl, this is awesome news! Now I don't have to shell out all that cash to visit the real Arrendale.
Have you seen what round trip airfare costs just to get there....??!!![]()
Hasn't Epcot been the number 2 US themepark for a very long time? Where did this notion that Epcot was somehow failing come from?To me, it's not even worth arguing whether the changes at Epcot are because
A) The public isn't interested in the concept of the park as it existed at opening (let alone in the mind's eye of a certain someone)
or
B) Disney decided not to spend cash/imagination on upkeep/improvements.
The truth is that both of those realities make me sad.
NoHasn't Epcot been the number 2 US themepark for a very long time? Where did this notion that Epcot was somehow failing come from? I think that B) is the likely answer.
x2
And it's telling on a societal level.
The interest in science and invention ( and frankly - public/ government good will and investment in it) is what made America great and allowed it to dominate the 20th century...
Now we don't care for those things...and where has the road turned?
I'll take it one further
knowledge = EPCOT
Recreation and lightheadedness = New Fantayland.
Interesting, huh?
Not really, we're not getting an attraction! We are losing one and replacing it with one, not the same thing at all especially when the one we are losing is a classic. Yes, there is going to be a new meet and greet but in reality it's not the thing most people will care about.I'm going to jump in here and say that I think this is a *good* thing. We'll get both an attraction and a meet and greet.
Indeed. It saddens me that it takes the involvement of someone who made 'The Family Guy' to get a series like 'Cosmos' back on the air for an update. Thankfully my corneas weren't violated with the likes of Honey Boo Boo.
But hey, I can always watch 'Who Wants To Be A Millionaire' and claim that I learned something.
Really... can't you see a Princess Meet and Greet dessert party soiree with special seating for Illuminations?
I meant to say number 2 American themepark but I'd still be wrong.No
MK #1
Tokyo Disneyland #2
Disneyland #3
Tokyo disneysea #4
Epcot #5
That's top 5 worldwide pretty sure Epcot has been behind MK and Disneyland for a very long time.
I meant to say number 2 American themepark but I'd still be wrong.Epcot hasn't exactly been struggling though.
I see your point, and I'm sure the imagineers do as well.
BREAKING: Coming Winter 2018 to New Fantasyland: Frozen Fantasy, a new dark SLEIGH ride starring all your favorite Frozen friends. Follow Anna, Kristoff, Elsa, Olaf, and Sven as they try to escape a rampaging Marshmallow set upon them by the evil Hans!
Hasn't Epcot been the number 2 US themepark for a very long time? Where did this notion that Epcot was somehow failing come from?
I think that B) is the likely answer.
I agree completely. The park would require constant care with routine updates to stick to its original vision. Disney has failed to make even a half-hearted attempt.I don't claim it's failing to make money. I maintain that it's failing to live up to its own reputation with respect to quality.