...
Regardless, what you describe above is exactly the reason for the post. Due to backlogged construction schedules, people have not been getting immediate points for many purchases in the recent past. Some received Developer's Points...many more did not.
But, those purchasing thru DVC have ALWAYS received points from the current Use Year. True, there have been some situations when some Use Years had no current points since the resort was not yet open (thus there were 0 points in that Use Year), but the policy for DVC since 1991 has been to provide the current points. In some cases - and as recently as AKV sales - Developer Points or other discounts were offered when a resort was not yet open.
In the early 90's DVC was strict about NOT allowing points from a new purchase to be banked beyond the banking deadlines, but that policy was relaxed years ago.
tjkraz said:
You may know that this type of arrangement was commonplace dating back 18 months or more...Doc knows that...I know that...but people considering DVC now have very little chance of realizing it on their own.
This is not described as a "special." I didn't call it a "bonus" or an "incentive" or a "promotion." Really I think you are reading far too much into it. It was merely an attempt to draw attention to a procedure that has fallen by the wayside in recent years.
Except for
some Kidani buyers and now BLT and GCV, none of the other resorts have had such Use Year delays without getting some appropriate incentive along with an explanation about the policy and at this time, none of the other resorts (OKW, VB, HH, BWV, VWL, BCV, SSR) purchased thru DVC directly have any such restriction unless DVC just has no contracts available for a specific Use Year - in which case the contract would not be available at all - with or without current points.
When SSR began sales prior to opening, there were incentives to balance the lack of current points for some Use Years. When OKW sold reopened sales for buildings 62 - 64, there was no regard for use year and all buyers received current points even before the new villas opened. When BWV sold the new villas recaptured by the relocation of the sales center, there was no regard for use year and all buyers received current points even before the new villas opened. Buyers at Jambo and also Kidani received some incentives to replace the lack of current points.
tjkraz said:
The main problem I have with your statement here is that we do not know with 100% certainty that what you describe will continue to be the case. You are also ignoring the fact that many buyers want a specific UY--not just whatever UY will get them the most points when they decide to pull the trigger.
I was specifically told that people who buy by Feb 28 will get the March '09 points. Would it have been MORE responsible of me to simply say "oh, no urgency to buy now because you'll always be able to do that"? Can any of us state--unequivocally--that people who purchase by May 31 will always get points from the prior June?
I would rather err on the side of caution.
But if a buyer WANTS a March Use Year, now is certainly the time to buy. Waiting two weeks and still insisting on the March UY would cost the buyer a set of points. If my comments help a potential buyer understand that they very much have something to gain by purchasing in the next couple of days, then mission accomplished.
The mission of posting static content (in a headline font announcing
Double points in first year with purchase) is a little different than having an open discussion about the same DVC policies and practices on a forum like this.
When the lead sentence in the "news" article suggests urgency (
For a limited time buyers who purchase an ownership in the Disney Vacation Club will receive double their normal allotment of points to use within the first year. ) for a policy that has always been the case, it's certainly open to discussion here - where it's not as important to worry about "caution".
Without any editorial comment to provide the background history, I can see where potential new buyers might believe this is indeed a new policy. Simply reporting the historical past speaks volumes about the current "Double points" incentive.
I suppose there are
some who will view "Double points" as
news, but if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it may just be the same old policy used for years with nothing more than a misleading marketing spin.