It'll be interesting to see how accurate this information is.
A couple of random asides.
First, I had been considering buying DVC membership at GCH but seeing all the changes over the last 18 months or so has made me realize that I can't have any security over the "value" of DVC. The property is tied so closely to DLR that if the policies and pricing at DLR becomes unattractive, the property itself is unattractive. Imagine if ticket prices are double the current price in three years, and every holiday season has "parties" in the evenings, usually four nights a week Thursday through Sunday, with extra cost attached... well, that would put a serious serious crimp in the value of DVC, that's for sure, and also a crimp in the value of having an AP (if on peak nights, everyone was kicked out of one park unless they paid $50 or $60 for a "party", making the other park super crowded).
Second, regardless of right, wrong, logic, illogic, I know my own family with three young kids found the current FP system very good precisely because we could collect FP during the morning and come back to use them later in the day or even in the evening. It's just not possible to schedule things tightly enough to guarantee that we'll be in the right part of the park at the right time to use FP, and my youngest takes about 40 minutes to walk from one end of DLR to the other. It will be a serious crimp in our plans if FP return times are enforced... I also really really don't like the idea of reserving FP using a computer or phone like a dinner reservation, it removes so much of the spontaneity that comes from wandering around the park and deciding as you go... just makes the whole thing a lot more work.
I guess I had three points LOL I would also ditto some other posters in that we've been avoiding WDW given how the parks are spread out, require more planning, and seem to work best when you eat at the parks (we tend to prefer finding cheaper more local fare off site) but if DLR slowly becomes more and more like WDW the differences go away. WDW with free dining and relatively inexpensive on site lodging becomes a lot more of a possibility. I suppose Disney probably won't care if we go that route, but it's unclear to me if they make more money off a guest being at DLR for one day vs being at WDW for one day. Do they really want a lot of people saying "eh, forget it, I have to fly regardless, might as well fly to FL and get free dining for the same $$"? That strikes me as foolish.
A couple of random asides.
First, I had been considering buying DVC membership at GCH but seeing all the changes over the last 18 months or so has made me realize that I can't have any security over the "value" of DVC. The property is tied so closely to DLR that if the policies and pricing at DLR becomes unattractive, the property itself is unattractive. Imagine if ticket prices are double the current price in three years, and every holiday season has "parties" in the evenings, usually four nights a week Thursday through Sunday, with extra cost attached... well, that would put a serious serious crimp in the value of DVC, that's for sure, and also a crimp in the value of having an AP (if on peak nights, everyone was kicked out of one park unless they paid $50 or $60 for a "party", making the other park super crowded).
Second, regardless of right, wrong, logic, illogic, I know my own family with three young kids found the current FP system very good precisely because we could collect FP during the morning and come back to use them later in the day or even in the evening. It's just not possible to schedule things tightly enough to guarantee that we'll be in the right part of the park at the right time to use FP, and my youngest takes about 40 minutes to walk from one end of DLR to the other. It will be a serious crimp in our plans if FP return times are enforced... I also really really don't like the idea of reserving FP using a computer or phone like a dinner reservation, it removes so much of the spontaneity that comes from wandering around the park and deciding as you go... just makes the whole thing a lot more work.
I guess I had three points LOL I would also ditto some other posters in that we've been avoiding WDW given how the parks are spread out, require more planning, and seem to work best when you eat at the parks (we tend to prefer finding cheaper more local fare off site) but if DLR slowly becomes more and more like WDW the differences go away. WDW with free dining and relatively inexpensive on site lodging becomes a lot more of a possibility. I suppose Disney probably won't care if we go that route, but it's unclear to me if they make more money off a guest being at DLR for one day vs being at WDW for one day. Do they really want a lot of people saying "eh, forget it, I have to fly regardless, might as well fly to FL and get free dining for the same $$"? That strikes me as foolish.