In the cases of litigation, I view attorneys as the "nuclear option."
It's nice to know you have them available, but you really don't want to use one because when you do, the other side's going to use theirs, and then no one wins (except the attorneys who make $$$ of the fees).
(disclaimer (which I probably wouldn't have to post if the following weren't somewhat accurate)

: these are not necessarily MY opinions on attorneys, rather my thoughts on why attorneys have the reputation they do.)
One of the reasons, IMHO, that attorneys in general get a bad rap are because the general public rarely uses them on a regular basis. But, our exposure to attorneys is on TV. First, you have the "ambulance chasers" who, in the guise of getting
you big bucks by suing, wind up with 30-40% of any wins (plus legal fees). Or, you have the "win at any cost" criminal defendant attorneys who will do anything to get their client's off - guilty or not (think OJ). Third, a inordinate percentage of national politicians are attorneys - and who trusts politicians? Then, you have the attorneys who try to "bend the law" to get around the intent of the law... (eg, "It depends on what the definition of 'is' is.") And, many times, in order to justify their fees, contract attorneys will nit-pick and make insignificant modifications to a contract that do nothing. I've seen this many times in real estate deals, when a word may be changed from "which" to "that", or "it's to its"... grammatical stuff that has nothing to do with the legality of the contract. Another major exposure the general public has to attorneys are the "class action" lawsuits - you know the ones that wind up costing a business $500,000,000.00 and the attorney gets 30% and the rest gets divided up to $2.38 per claimant. Who wins there? Certainly not the ones who were wronged.
The US is the most litigious society in the world. It winds up costing businesses billions of extra dollars a year because of that.
The cost of health insurance is so high because of attorneys. The cost of auto insurance is so high because of attorneys.
Plus, every time you pick up the phone to ask a simple question... $150.
Here's a good example... I re-read the posts about a will and people wanting to save a couple hundred bucks by doing it themselves. You know, a will is pretty simple - in most cases it should not require a lawyer. Yet the lawyers, who MAKE the laws (politicians), pass laws requiring lawyers to have to draw certain contracts. How's that for smarmy? Anyhow, back to my example... my parents recently went to get their will drawn up. Nothing too fancy - they have a house, a vacation house, and some money in the bank. There are 3 siblings. $4,000.00 to draw up a will to state that X gets X%, Y gets Y% and Z gets Z%. What?!? I can buy a will maker program for $29.99 at
Best Buy that'll do the same thing - but it may not be "legal" in the eyes of the legal system because it wasn't "attorney drawn."
I think many people view the attorneys as "used car salesmen" with better suits.