kellyg403 said:
I think that the orginial idea of excused/unexcused absences and the number you are allowed so that you can be promoted regardless of grades is a good idea. I do think it is geared towards those children who for whatever reason are not going to school. These kids get promoted year after year and then get into 10th grade with a 3rd grade education and quit.
These sentences are completely contradictory. To say that a child should not be promoted regardless of grades, then state the reason as them getting to 10th grade without a 3rd grade education doesn't make a lot of sense. Some children are beyond a 3rd grade education, when they are in that particular grade.
A couple other statements don't quite register with me. The person who said they should do away with the gifted programs. What could they possibly be thinking?
We live in Florida & our DS(13) has been in 2 different school districts. Both have worked with us in every situation. I had one of his teachers tell me that they determine the amount of days they approve for a child to miss, by the child's grades & ability. It doesn't quite seem fair to all, but it does eliminate the concern of a child not being able to catch up. In my son's school, everything seems to revolve around their ability to perform well on the end of grade tests. If the tests look good, the teacher looks good! We aren't taking him out for vacation, but I am confident that he wouldn't be permanately harmed academically if we did.

He is in the gifted program & missing a few days sick doesn't get him so far behind that he can't catch up.
To the person who mentioned the never ending amount of time teachers put in, we obviously don't know the same teachers. I have 2 sisters & many 1st cousins who are teachers in NC. They get off more days than their kids do. I've seen them drop their kids off many times, then take the day off to keep from losing their days. They can't go anywhere, because they can't take their kids out of school. No, they aren't paid as much as many working professionals, but they're not working typical full-time jobs. I wouldn't necessarily want their job. On the other hand, if I were a teacher with the amount of days off that they get, I certainly wouldn't say anything about a child missing a week for vacation. BTW, I also know several teachers in Florida & none of them seem to be as dedicated as the ones you know. They are very good at their jobs, but they definitely don't spend all their time going to classes, seminars, etc. If any of the teachers I know go to seminars, they are getting more out of the trip than classes. I don't think either of my sisters would consider these seminars a burden. Most of them are more like a chance to fly to a city, stay in a hotel, & have a food budget on the state's dime. Of course, they take a few classes during the day in order to get this perk. Those that don't require travel are usually held during school hours, & a substitute fills in for them. It's not something I'd turn down.
Just my 2 cents. Sorry, so long.
