JCJRSmith
US Navy Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2003
- Messages
- 2,213
Because we are a united federation of largely independent states, and a popular vote election would mean that California and New York/New Jersey with their large populations would determine the outcome of every single election. No one would campaign anywhere else. No one would draft legislation or policy that helped any other states. The other states would simply cease to exist in the minds of politicians. There would be the East Coast, the West Coast, and nothing else. This would lead to a regionally balkanized political landscape in which the unrepresented people in "flyover country" would eventually revolt. The popular vote argument is a recipe for civil war. Our entire governmental structure is purposefully intended to prevent certain regions of the country from becoming all-powerful because the framers of the Constitution, in their astonishing brilliance and foresight, knew that if that happened, the country would disintegrate.
And check your state's laws about voter ID. Those poll workers who aren't asking you for ID may be violating the law, and they should be called out on it.
And lastly, absentee and provisional ballots ARE COUNTED in every single state. It is a federal law and is required of all states in their federal election audit. However, if an election is not close meaning that if ALL of the absentee and provisional ballots went for one candidate or the other and it still wouldn't change the outcome of the electronic balloting they aren't included when a state or precinct announces the winner. It takes up to 2 weeks to count such ballots, and the announcement of a winner is typically required much sooner than that, except in extraordinarily close contests.
Outstanding post here, Loco.
I am a firm believer that those who do not participate in the political process by not voting get the government they deserve. Further, if one does not vote, I believe one should have the personal integrity to NOT exercise their right to free speech and complain about the governement that was elected while one stood idly by. Personally, I see voting as an OBLIGATION, not a RIGHT, but that is just MY opinion.
I just don't want the guilt that comes with splitting the opposition vote. Honestly I don't know what system would be better but the electoral college is SUPER hard to understand and I don't think it truly represents the will of the people. YES I know that Republicans have benefitted from the system in the past, I want fairness regardless of which side it helps or hurts. I'd rather have Obama elected based on the true will of the people than McCain or someone else elected with this mumbo jumbo we have now. Just my opinion.