Most Expensive / Moist Exhausting Continued - Final thoughts and wrap-up

[glennbo123]

I think you, uh the Rules Committee can only draw the line at multiple reflective images in the same picture and same reflective surface. The precedent for real Judy and Judy reflection in the same picture was set when a certain troublesome individual lost a previous contest of you and Judy at a DISMeet when Judy's reflection was in the glass table top in two of the pictures and said troublesome individual let time pressure taint their incorrect response.

Yeah, yeah, I remember that...but I'm saying that the Rules Committee could make an addendum which says, "from henceforth yada yada yada....no more than 1 Judy per picture". So, it's not based on precedence, it's based on a new, stated rule.

Just as a service to other readers who might wonder what the hell Marv is talking about (just as I was...)

I just like the evidence to be presented in a clear manner!

Ah yes, thank you for your help.

Thanks Your Honor! (I think)

Sorry I didn't state my argument in a more concise and clear manner. I'm sure Glenn, I mean the Rules Committee, will still Object. Probably some weak argument about leading the witness or something.

You were plenty clear and concise, and the Rules Committee still objects.

Yes, I meant to support you... Even though I did not see the reflexions - neither in the post where you did not win because you did not see them nor in the one where you lost because they did not count... But I think the rules committee needs to be consistent - but then the deadline for filing for a complaint for the old ruling might have expired by now...

Now I am afraid that giving the rules committe such a hard time will make them see me as much as a troublemaker as Marv...

I've got troublemakers on nearly every continent.

Thanks for your support Magdalene. As for the last part you can't help it if great minds think alike!

Oh boy.

Glen My answer is correct

That's all that counts.

As for scrutiny of TR's Iseem to remember quite a lot of just that when I so Innocently had my seat stolen by a pig and had nowhere else to sit!!!

That's true. That one got a lot of attention.

Translated Marv is a master at confusing the issue !!!!

 

[Poolrat]

Glen My answer is correct

As for scrutiny of TR's Iseem to remember quite a lot of just that when I so Innocently had my seat stolen by a pig and had nowhere else to sit!!!

That seriously funny. Luckily I was not drinking anything or I would have ruined my computer.

 

[3prettyprincesses]

Just as a service to other readers who might wonder what the hell Marv is talking about (just as I was...)

I just like the evidence to be presented in a clear manner!

Magdelne, you're quite thorough! Great job!

Thanks Your Honor! (I think)

Sorry I didn't state my argument in a more concise and clear manner. I'm sure Glenn, I mean the Rules Committee, will still Object. Probably some weak argument about leading the witness or something.

Hmm, seems like the Rules Committee isn't so much a committee but more of a, ahem, dictatorship? I mean really, who else is a member other than our slightly moist author??

Thanks for your support Magdalene. As for the last part you can't help it if great minds think alike!

Totally!

Yeah, yeah, I remember that...but I'm saying that the Rules Committee could make an addendum which says, "from henceforth yada yada yada....no more than 1 Judy per picture". So, it's not based on precedence, it's based on a new, stated rule.

You were plenty clear and concise, and the Rules Committee still objects.

I've got troublemakers on nearly every continent.

Ok, I see how it is then. New rules can be instituted at random. Where's the system of checks and balances?

I rest my case.

Now that's hard to believe...

 

[eandesmom]

Great update!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So cute with the girls and their pearl rings. At their age I remember thinking it was the prettiest ring ever and had one that I wore for years and years and years. Nice sizes for both of them. I'm glad they both did it, they'll have it to share later on and it will be pretty darn special.

 

[All7OfUs]

That seriously funny. Luckily I was not drinking anything or I would have ruined my computer.

I was....

And I think I just ruined my computer.




And it's even funnier because it happened to be wine.

 

[marvali]

As for scrutiny of TR's Iseem to remember quite a lot of just that when I so Innocently had my seat stolen by a pig and had nowhere else to sit!!!

Was that scrutiny? Or people running away screaming, looking for something to gouge their eyes out with???

Translated Marv is a master at confusing the issue !!!!

Rosie, I would almost take that as a complement, but knowing it is coming from you I'm not sure that is really such a challenge.....

Yeah, yeah, I remember that...but I'm saying that the Rules Committee could make an addendum which says, "from henceforth yada yada yada....no more than 1 Judy per picture". So, it's not based on precedence, it's based on a new, stated rule.

Guess I need to go back and pull a Magdalene with requoting your comments about precedents being set.......

You were plenty clear and concise, and the Rules Committee still objects.

WHAT? NOOOOOOO! I can't BELIEVE the Rules Committee would still object!!!! Not to ME!

I've got troublemakers on nearly every continent.

Some people just INVITE it!!!

That's all that counts.

That. And who you are.......

Oh so NOW you're agreeable.... Wish you would rub some of that off on that dang Rules Committee!!!

Magdelne, you're quite thorough! Great job!

Yeah, she ought to be a lawyer or something.....

Hmm, seems like the Rules Committee isn't so much a committee but more of a, ahem, dictatorship? I mean really, who else is a member other than our slightly moist author??

Okay, for a second there I was wondering where you were going with this.....

Ok, I see how it is then. New rules can be instituted at random. Where's the system of checks and balances?

I guess that's what you get when some clown just dreams up a game and doesn't get all the rules down in writing up front.....

I rest my case.

Now that's hard to believe...

Dang Moll, I'm starting to think you aren't so bad after all.....no matter what the rest of them say about you!!!

 

[Flossbolna]

Magdelne, you're quite thorough! Great job!

Thanks!

Hmm, seems like the Rules Committee isn't so much a committee but more of a, ahem, dictatorship? I mean really, who else is a member other than our slightly moist author??

That was a good one!

Yeah, she ought to be a lawyer or something.....

That's an idea! Why haven't I thought of that before???

 

[glennbo123]

That seriously funny. Luckily I was not drinking anything or I would have ruined my computer.

You’ve gotta be careful on the DIS. Especially when people lap-dance with character-pigs.

I was....

And I think I just ruined my computer.




And it's even funnier because it happened to be wine.

Maybe that was a contributing factor.

Great update!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So cute with the girls and their pearl rings. At their age I remember thinking it was the prettiest ring ever and had one that I wore for years and years and years. Nice sizes for both of them. I'm glad they both did it, they'll have it to share later on and it will be pretty darn special.

Thanks Cynthia! You’re right, I think it will be a special memory for them for a long time.

 

[glennbo123]

Magdelne, you're quite thorough! Great job!

Yeah, yeah, yeah.

Hmm, seems like the Rules Committee isn't so much a committee but more of a, ahem, dictatorship? I mean really, who else is a member other than our slightly moist author??

The membership is shrouded in secrecy. It’s rumored that they may, in fact, be the Illuminati.

Ok, I see how it is then. New rules can be instituted at random. Where's the system of checks and balances?

Not at random….they can be instituted after much discussion, deliberation, analysis, and careful thought (amongst the Rules Committee members, not you yay-hoo’s) and the new rules can be put into effect before a new round of the game is posted.

The Rules Committee has all the checks and balances you need sister.

I rest my case.

Oh good. I thought this was going to go on for a while.

Now that's hard to believe...

You ain’t kiddin’.

Was that scrutiny? Or people running away screaming, looking for something to gouge their eyes out with???

How come we can disagree on so many things, but on this matter see eye-to-gouged-out-eye?

Guess I need to go back and pull a Magdalene with requoting your comments about precedents being set.......

I’m sure that Magdalene could tell us that precedents are used when the written law is unclear on a particular point. If the written law is amended to provide clarity, the precedents are no longer used.

Some people just INVITE it!!!

Who are these people?

Oh so NOW you're agreeable.... Wish you would rub some of that off on that dang Rules Committee!!!

You’ve gotta keep Rosie happy or who knows what she’ll post on your thread….lap-dancing pigs, shower caps, etc.

I guess that's what you get when some clown just dreams up a game and doesn't get all the rules down in writing up front.....

I’ve heard people say “get it in writing”, but I never imagined that it would apply to this game!

Dang Moll, I'm starting to think you aren't so bad after all.....no matter what the rest of them say about you!!!

I noticed that she didn’t mention that it was she who stole that DIS-meet round from you that you referenced yesterday.

That's an idea! Why haven't I thought of that before???

I thought you were a professional Disney tour-er.

 

[glennbo123]

Did you folks notice on the front page of the DIS, under DIS Site Notices, that there's an article saying that the refillable mugs are now good for life?

Gaaah! A while back Judy threw out a few of ours in order to make room in her cupboards. We still have 2 or 3 left, but....

 

[GreatBiscuit]

Did you folks notice on the front page of the DIS, under DIS Site Notices, that there's an article saying that the refillable mugs are now good for life?

Gaaah! A while back Judy threw out a few of ours in order to make room in her cupboards. We still have 2 or 3 left, but....

Don't un-root too many follicles until you read the article.

 

[glennbo123]

Don't un-root too many follicles until you read the article.

Oooo, let me go read beyond the title.

 

[marvali]

Oh good. I thought this was going to go on for a while.

That WOULD be surprising with all the short term memory people have around here.....

How come we can disagree on so many things, but on this matter see eye-to-gouged-out-eye?

Probably because most of our disagreement is purely to get a laugh at each other's expense.

I’m sure that Magdalene could tell us that precedents are used when the written law is unclear on a particular point. If the written law is amended to provide clarity, the precedents are no longer used.

Oh, like she knows anything about the law!!!

Who are these people?

Rosie, Liesa, Dan, our favorite "whippin'-boy,".................

You’ve gotta keep Rosie happy or who knows what she’ll post on your thread….lap-dancing pigs, shower caps, etc.

I know, right!?!

I noticed that she didn’t mention that it was she who stole that DIS-meet round from you that you referenced yesterday.

It did cross my mind whether or not she would be so agreeable if she was directly involved in the outcome.......

 

[3prettyprincesses]

Did you folks notice on the front page of the DIS, under DIS Site Notices, that there's an article saying that the refillable mugs are now good for life?

Gaaah! A while back Judy threw out a few of ours in order to make room in her cupboards. We still have 2 or 3 left, but....

What???? Wow, that's fabulous! Too bad they make you scan your finger for every refill though...

Hey, I also heard that Disney is now limiting how many children you're allowed to bring into the park as well. Apparently they scan your child each time to make sure they belong to you, and then keep track of how many times they go into the parks with you. I believe the limit is two children per family.

 

[glennbo123]

Don't un-root too many follicles until you read the article.

Ah yes, that article could have been written by the famous reporter, Lirpa Loof.

 

[3prettyprincesses]

Ah yes, that article could have been written by the famous reporter, Lirpa Loof.

Yes, I believe that was her. She's been known to collaborate on articles with her assitant Ay Tog I.

 

[glennbo123]

Probably because most of our disagreement is purely to get a laugh at each other's expense.

Too true!

What???? Wow, that's fabulous! Too bad they make you scan your finger for every refill though...

When I got to the part where it said there was a chip embedded in the mug I knew it was fake -- the mugs are made where I grew up and I knew that my former classmates couldn't handle embedding a chip in the mugs when they're cranking them out.

Hey, I also heard that Disney is now limiting how many children you're allowed to bring into the park as well. Apparently they scan your child each time to make sure they belong to you, and then keep track of how many times they go into the parks with you. I believe the limit is two children per family.

Wow, you and I and Marv make out on that deal. Liesa makes out like a bandit.

 

[3prettyprincesses]

The membership is shrouded in secrecy. It’s rumored that they may, in fact, be the Illuminati.

Not at random….they can be instituted after much discussion, deliberation, analysis, and careful thought (amongst the Rules Committee members, not you yay-hoo’s) and the new rules can be put into effect before a new round of the game is posted.

The Rules Committee has all the checks and balances you need sister.

I noticed that she didn’t mention that it was she who stole that DIS-meet round from you that you referenced yesterday.

Ahhh, I see. The Illuminati. They sound like a reputable group, though Dan Brown might see it otherwise...

Well, that's a relief! I'd hate to think these so called rules are just you know, made up or something.

I didn't mention that round I stole from Marv either, no need to embarrass the poor fellow again. He seemed pretty upset by it.

It did cross my mind whether or not she would be so agreeable if she was directly involved in the outcome.......

Hey, I thought you were on my side? How are we going to overthrow, er I mean appeal the Rules Committee's frivolous rules? I can't do it alone Marv.

 

[FauntleroyFAN07]

darn glenn for reading the whole article i was going to see if you wanted to buy some ocean front property i had in wyoming.

 

[onelilspark]

Did you folks notice on the front page of the DIS, under DIS Site Notices, that there's an article saying that the refillable mugs are now good for life?

Gaaah! A while back Judy threw out a few of ours in order to make room in her cupboards. We still have 2 or 3 left, but....

Even the ones I got last year? I can bring them back in May without shame??

...Man I am so gullible. First April Fools joke I've fell for today...