Most Economical Resort - Beyond Year 1

As a single resort example of cash rates vs. dues, I've looked at BCV, which Touring Plans has data going back to 2014 on (though they indicate they are unsure whether tax was included in their data pre-2018).

In 2014, the average week in a Studio was $465 vs. $723 in 2024. This works out to CAGR of 4.50%, but dues had a CAGR of 4.07% over the same period.

It's worse for 1BR: $654 -> $1,036, CAGR of 4.71%.

And worse still for 2BR: $1,010 -> $1,713, CAGR of 5.42%.

NB: I have no idea if this is more broadly indicative of the entire cash booking market.
 
Also I don't see those rooms available with the discounts very often. RIV standard one bedrooms are one of our favorites
This is true, even with a CM discount they don’t always offer every resort at a discount. This is part of the thing that pushed us toward DVC. Even though I do compare my points cost to rack rate and 25% off rack rate it’s a pretty big assumption that the resort you want will even be offered at that discounted rate when you want to go.
 
Last edited:
Dues growth factor isn't going to work for forecasting rack rates. In only a few years the full priced cash rates of BLT exceed that of VGF, which will ~never happen.

In order to maintain the cash rate heirarchy of resorts, I think I need to use the same growth factor across all resorts. But what should that be? I've been using 4.38% as a 'generic WDW' dues growth factor for newer resorts, should I use that?
So Disney took massive price increases in the early 2010s (Bob Iger even brags about them in his autobiography) but has mostly leveled off since then. The rack rates seem to increase 1.5-2%% ahead of inflation except during the significant inflation of 2022-23. But the discounts seem to increase in tandem.

Not every resort has moved in tandem, nor has every season. They’ve increased the prices of fall faster than summer. They took very sharp increases at CR in 2021 for some reason.

You’ll just have to make assumptions. I’d suggest 4% gross increase is close enough.

“All models are wrong but some are useful” - George E. P. Box
 
Update time!

Calling this an October Update, as it includes DVC Resale Market's avg prices from September 2024 but also Poly Direct as a buying category as well as Poly 1BR, Poly 2BR, and Poly 2BRPH points data.

Unfortunately, we don't know the room view distribution of the new Poly rooms so view mix used for some of the calculations is a mildly educated guess on my part.

Methodology remains the same, and I'm not going to rehash it. Review page 1 to get caught up.

Just Year 1
Just-Year1.png


Just Year 5
Just-Year5.png


Just Year 10
Just-Year10.png


Just Year 17
Just-Year17.png



Sum of Years 1-5, Years 1-10, and Years 1-17
Years1-5.png
Years1-10.png
Years1-17.png



Charts

Full-Chart.png


Zoomed-Chart.png
 
So the above post is a look at the least expensive points, ignoring the points chart.

This post folds in the points charts at each resort. These tables can be thought of as your effective cost/yr to buy points at that resort and then use them at that resort.

As a reminder "Cheapest [room]" describes the 'average week' number of points needed for cheapest view category, where the average comes avg pts/night across 365 days. "Average [room]" describes the 'average week' number of points needed for a weighted average (based on room counts) for a room at that resort.

Some changes in this October Update:
  • I'm counting CFW's cabins in both the Studios category and the 1BR category
  • Poly Resale (PVB-R) and Poly Direct (PVB-D) are seprate categories. Direct is based on buying 150pts with no Magical Beginnings.
  • Poly has 1BR, 2BR, and 2BR Penthouses now! 'Cheapest [room]' here is based on Standard View rooms. Average 1BR/2BR gets a big skew upward compared to Poly Studios as it appears the mix of 1BR/2BR has a much higher Theme Park View mix as there are no 1BR/2BR in the longhouses (which had a heavy Standard View skew)

Years 1-5
Studios-Y1-5.png
1BRY1-5.png
2BRY1-5.png
GVPHRY1-5.png


Years 1-10

Studios-Y1-10.png
1BRY1-10.png
2BRY1-10.png
GVPHRY1-10.png



Years 1-17
Studios-Y1-17.png
1BRY1-17.png
2BRY1-17.png
GVPHRY1-17.png
 
Last edited:
Update time!

Calling this an October Update, as it includes DVC Resale Market's avg prices from September 2024 but also Poly Direct as a buying category as well as Poly 1BR, Poly 2BR, and Poly 2BRPH points data.

Unfortunately, we don't know the room view distribution of the new Poly rooms so view mix used for some of the calculations is a mildly educated guess on my part.

Methodology remains the same, and I'm not going to rehash it. Review page 1 to get caught up.

Just Year 1
Just-Year1.png


Just Year 5
Just-Year5.png


Just Year 10
Just-Year10.png


Just Year 17
Just-Year17.png



Sum of Years 1-5, Years 1-10, and Years 1-17
Years1-5.png
Years1-10.png
Years1-17.png



Charts

Full-Chart.png


Zoomed-Chart.png
Much appreciated as always. Again I got some at the top and some at the bottom.
 
I would have guessed OKW would be below SSR with the way prices are right now but I see it’s ever so slightly higher.

SSR is underpriced!
One of the things that caught my eye about SSR and OKW is that their Grand Villas work out to have similar or even less expensive costs over time vs. 2BR at Poly (resale or direct), not even Penthouses, just plain Poly 2BR/2BRLO.

OKW is best explained by the soft points chart for GV, but SSR has a modern ratio and the SSR Grand Villas are nice. Poly's 2BR room mix and points chart also are major contributors.

This 'bigger category is less expensive' is fairly common in 1BR vs. 2BR, shows up a little bit in Studio vs. 1BR, but not sure I'd ever considered 2BR vs. Grand Villa.

SSR is definitely undervalued.
 
One of the things that caught my eye about SSR and OKW is that their Grand Villas work out to have similar or even less expensive costs over time vs. 2BR at Poly (resale or direct), not even Penthouses, just plain Poly 2BR/2BRLO.

OKW is best explained by the soft points chart for GV, but SSR has a modern ratio and the SSR Grand Villas are nice. Poly's 2BR room mix and points chart also are major contributors.

This 'bigger category is less expensive' is fairly common in 1BR vs. 2BR, shows up a little bit in Studio vs. 1BR, but not sure I'd ever considered 2BR vs. Grand Villa.

SSR is definitely undervalued.
Yeah the queen beds at the OKW GVs are a turn off for us. The SSR ones seem *great* for if we ever take my extended family again. And both seem like a way better idea for even a stay for the 5 of us vs a Poly 2BR
 
I feel like I’m going to end up getting PVB-D and then using the points at BLT because of the point charts. 🙃
I’ve had the same thoughts. But then I remember that would violate the rule “buy where you want to stay”. And I might never get bargain 1 BR standard view at BLT without my points there. Harumph. White card life forever! Which is probably better for my wallet anyway. But I’m jealous of the Sorcerer Pass perk.
 
Thank you so much for this analysis, a view of the point+dues cost over a long time horizon with a discount rate applied was exactly what I was looking for. I created an account on DISBoards just to reply to this thread!

I am not a DVC member, but considering becoming one in 2-5 years. There’s a few more tables I wanted to put together based on this data, and I was wondering if you would be able to share the sheets you’ve built for these posts at all (no worries if not).

Specifically, I want to look at:
  • The cost over time line graphs adjusted for (projected) inflation, as I personally find it easier to think in real terms.
  • Tables of Years 1-29 (excluding the 2042 contracts). As 2054 is the next deed expiration after 2042, it would be great to see what happens over a longer timespan. Additionally it is the end date for SSR which is obviously very competitive economically — how does it fare over the full life of its contract? It seems to overtake PVB and CCV in the existing charts.
  • [Planned] A measure of Home Resort Premium per Point and Home Resort Premium per Week [in each unit size]. The analysis you have presented for cost per year if using the points at a home resort make it easy to compute the premium we pay for choosing a home resort, instead of the cheapest contracts. It would be great to know, for example, that over 10 years, PVB is 15% more expensive than SSR per point, and 74% more expensive for 7 days in an average studio. For resorts with high premiums, it becomes less advantageous for owners to use their points elsewhere.
  • [Planned] A measure of Availability @ 7mos. This gets at the benefit of home resort booking, and while people talk about availability anecdotally, it would be great to quantify next to the Home Resort Premium. I see DVC Field Guide has 6 years of availability history available, with a 0-7 measure of availability and an average per unit type. Knowing the unit view mix, we could compute a weighted average per unit type in each resort of Availability @ 7 mos. Of course we have no idea how the availability might change over 5, 10, 17, 29 years.
Edit: posted a version of the last two bullet points here: Home Resort Premium: How much does it cost and is it worth it?.

Of course there’s a lot of assumptions in all of this, as there is in any model. A purchaser could choose a specific unit type, view, season or holiday, or even tweak the discount rate, time horizon, inflation rate, dues increase rate, or purchase price to make their decision. But it seems people generally make an emotional decision or a data-driven decision about which resort to buy, and this model comes very close to being the perfect data-driven model (in my opinion).
 
Last edited:
OP: You did it!
I’m now suffering Analysis Paralysis induced by Data Inundation!😂
I used a much more simplistic approach of graphing Y2-Y20 using 3 possible escalation factors (4%, 5%, & 6%), and was comfortable with my conclusion that the best add-ons for me would be SSR OR BLT.
THANKS to ehh! - for all the hard work, and the thorough explanations. AWESOME👍
 
Last edited:
Working on a January 2025 update for Most Economical Resort with the 2025 dues and the latest resale price data.

But first I wanted to do a retrospective on my forecast of 2025 dues I made back in July of 2024.

Predicted vs. Actual 2025 Dues
I'll start with a table, sorted by how wrong the forecasts were:
2025-Dues-Predicted-vs-Actual.png

As a reminder, my method for predicting longterm dues growth is as follows:
  • Determine 10yr Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) for every year possible (resort must have at least 11yr of dues data)
  • Take the last five 10yr-CAGRs
  • Longterm dues growth in my predictions is the median of the last five 10yr-CAGRs
If a resort is not old enough to use the last five 10yr-CAGR, I use the median of the last five 5yr-CAGRs. If a resort is still not old enough, I use the median of the last five 10yr-CAGRs for its region (WDW and DL are currently only regions with 'too new' resorts). The resorts that use the regional growth rate have their growth rate shown in italics.

Why do I do it this way? Year-to-year dues growth is noisy, really noisy. So I focus on the longterm growth patterns while letting it move past early-years patterns. Using a median of a handful of CAGRs is done to 'stabilize' it further and reduce the odds that one bad dues year causes a double-impact (e.g., the impact of the YoY growth plus potentially replacing a small increase 11 years ago) for what might be a one-year blip.


I think there's a few distinct groupings of resorts here:

Saratoga, Bay Lake, Aulani, Hilton Head, and Copper Creek - Pretty much got it
All were within 6 cents/pt. Considering the method I use to predict longterm dues has a focus on the longterm, getting it close for one year isn't all that interesting to me, but I'll take wins where I can get them.

Copper Creek is an interesting one here. It's too young to get real predictions from my method so it used the generic 4.38% growth rate for WDW and it ended up being pretty close despite all the noise about it being so out of line with prior dues growth. Next year will be interesting as it'll age up to being eligible for the 'median of last five 5yr-CAGR' method. The highest 5yr CAGR for CCV is 2.66%, which is too low to expect longterm IMO (and the 2nd highest is 1.75%, and is the leading candidate of being the median...sigh).

BoardWalk, Old Key West, Grand Floridian, Animal Kingdom, Boulder Ridge, and Beach Club - Underpredicted, sometimes an uncomfortable amount
Underpredictions for all of these, and all in the 0.7-2.1% range, which is not a great prediction.

Grand Flo is maybe the one that I'm happiest about here, as I thought its prior growth rate was unsustainably low and put my finger on the scale to bump it from 3.52% to 3.58% in my 2024 predictions. Factoring in the 2025 dues it is now 3.58% without a finger on the scale.

As for the others, one thing that strikes me is that 4 of the 5 are the 2042 WDW resorts (OKW, BWV, BRV, and BCV) and had an average increase of 5.63% (vs. WDW's broader 4.32%*). Not sure if there's something about these resorts that I need to consider for the future, or if they all just collectively had rough years.

I'm assuming AKV went up because of the impending hard goods refurb.

* the broader WDW includes the decreases at PVB and CFW. Excluding those two the average 2025 increase at WDW was 5.12%.

Riviera, Vero Beach, Disneyland Hotel, and Grand Californian - Overpredicted and not accurate
Margin of error for these is 2-2.7%. Just bad. And if it's repeated for a few years then that's bad news for the longterm predictions. At least these resorts are barely being bought for SAP.

Riviera is still using the generic WDW growth rate of 4.38% and came well under at 2.33%. Might still be 'active sales' slow growth?

Vero Beach needed this, though. Their 5yr CAGR was 7.15% (and the three prior 5yr-CAGR were 8.05%, 8.55%, and 7.90%), so a year with just 3.17% growth is probably an unexpected relief for owners.

Disneyland Hotel is too new to have its own forecast, so it used Grand Cali's growth rate of 5.63%. Speaking of Grand Cali, its 2.84% increase YoY was the lowest in its entire history (seriously). Maybe there's some relief now that the hard goods refurb is funded and kicked off.


Polynesian and Cabins at Fort Wilderness - LOL I can't predict that
Polynesian dues went way down due to the introduction of Island Tower and the efficiencies of a tower impacting the balance of a resort. Also maybe some 'active sales' low growth stuff we've seen at other WDW resorts...

CFW is also part of the 'active sales' group and one of its biggest criticisms has been its absurdly abnormal dues, 13% higher than anywhere else at WDW and 34% higher than the average at WDW (which includes CFW!). I wouldn't be surprised if there's been an effort to improve the efficiency of running the cabins and that's reflected in the 2025 dues. It helps DVC sales but also helps Disney's rental margins of running all the unsold cabins.


Other Thoughts
I think my median-of-CAGRs approach held up okay. It's not really designed for going under the microscope for a single year's increase, but I didn't see anything in the 2025 dues that made me think my approach needed a rethink. Again, I use longterm growth history for the sake of future longterm growth predictions. That longterm future hasn't come yet.

That said, the newest resorts might need some manual tweaking of growth rate in the next few years. CCV will probably need me to bump its growth rate artificially to set proper expectations, and Poly/CFW's big decreases this year will wreak havoc on my method many years from now.
 

















DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top