Well, I haven't kicked this dead horse in awhile so here goes. Disney's policy was to allow the late use of fastpasses. There is no wiggle room here, that was their official policy.
Again, enforcement of the FP policy changed. And apparently all CMs didnt understand that to be the case because some CMs would not let guests return past their FP return window prior to March 7th. In the 2012, Unofficial Guide Book, the authors recommended that if you were to be turned away from using your FP late, you should return later and try with another CM. How did some CMs get the late Fast Pass memo and others did not? Was it not prt of their official training to allow late FP use? one would have to wonder if it were "policy" as some assert that it was not clearly understood or clearly defined in writing.
Now the "policy" has changed. Some people don't like it because it significantly changes the way they vacation, but it is what it is. We didn't hoard fastpasses to use at the end of the day, but we did use them when it was convenient and sometimes that was after the printed window. We were following Disney's policy and yes I believe that is the right thing to do. I will miss the flexibility, but it is what it is and we will adjust accordingly.
Now that the "enforcement" changed, you were previously only doing what Disney allowed by not strictly enforcing a written policy that was printed on the FP ticket.
As for why they had an end time if it wasn't their policy to enforce it, it is because they were influencing behavior. Many organizations, especially large organizations with lots of staistical data find ways to influence behavior without restricing themselves or their customers with excessive rules. Disney is very good at this. Sometimes this creates the illusion of a rule where none exists. In this case we have seen ample evidence that the rule or "policy" was that fastpasses would be valid on the day they were acquired anytime after the opening of the printed window.
Pyschobabble conjecture and wild speculation on your behalf. If Disney, wanted the FPs to be used this way from the beginning of the FP program then they would have never strictly have enforced the return window as they did when they rolled out the program. It was over time that they relaxed enforcement for reasons of guest satisfaction. When more people learned of this lax enforcement then it became the sort of "insider secret" before March 7th. If Disney truly wanted people to use FPs past their return window they would have changed their signage and promoted it widely as a perk to try to drive business. They didnt just print a return time on the ticket for psychological reasons. And again this reason doesnt account for why Disney first enforced the FP return window.
Regardless, the policy has changed. When a change at Disney negatively affects someone they are likely to complain. That is okay, they have the right. When those who disagree post stating that they believe the changes enhance the overall experience, that is okay too. What I (and others) do have a problem with is when this turns into attacks about how people didn't "do the right thing" and "follow policy" in the past. I know I shouldn't care what some nameless, faceless person says on a message board, even if their logic is flawed and seemingly ignorant of the acual policies sited, but I can't help it. The implication that I and others are of lessor character because we didn't follow a policy that never existed is irritating. If we could keep these discussions focused on wether the policy change has an overall positive or negative affect and leave the personal attacks out they would be of much more use. Okay, I will climb off my high horse and carefully walk around the dead one now (maybe one more kick on the way by).
Again, there is a difference between policy and enforcement. As noticed everyday in different counties when it comes to people violating speed limits. the same road going through two counties may have a speed limit of 55 but in county X they only enforce it starting at 5 miles over while county Y enforces it at 7 miles over the limit. But they may both not enforce at under 5 because of the variables that would affect them from making the fine stick if challenged in court. See, the Speed Limit policy never changed, only enforcement did.
And the Policy did exist because Disney enforced it when they first rolled out the FP program.
It is not my contention that people are of a lessor character because they took advantage of what Disney allowed in the past. And as you and others are tired of attacks from the "rule followers", I too tire of the name calling coming from the other side where people are called sheep, jealous, and their intelligence questioned because they didnt know that they could challenged what was written on the FP prior to March 7th. So please dont pretend that the personal attacks are one sided in this debate.