I still find it hard to believe that anyone would think that the interview was 'edited' to make Michael look bad. What I mean here is, we all heard the words coming out of his, MJ's, mouth. Maybe the journalist asked pointed questions, but Michael answered them. The only thing that the journalist MAY be guilty of is telling Michael that the interview would be edited to make him look good and it wasn't. Maybe he, the journalist, honestly thought this interview would explain Michael better and make him look better until he met him and talked to him. I, personally, didn't care about what the journalist's opinions were of MJ during the interview. MJ's own words were shocking enough to me, the journalist could have said nothing at all but MJs words spoke volumes..
You may be right thought Mickey4ever, maybe this was all a big scheme of MJ's and his publicist to get the world talking about MJ again. I mean look at all the press he has gotten over the last week, and you know what they used to say in Hollywood. No press is bad press.