There is an extra $5 fee that is being added too. So it's $47 all together. Still a lot of $$$.Actually, your math is off, at $42 per person per port, a cruise with two port stops in Mexico will now have a fee of $336 for a family of 4, with each port stop now costing an extra $168 for the 4 passengers.
My feeling is that if the fee sticks, you will start to see fewer stops at Mexican ports then in the past, since it will make cruises with stops in Mexico more expensive than those that make stops in the Carribean. So, while this will raise income for Mexico, it will also not raise as much as they are hoping as the cruise industry makes fewer visits to ports in Mexico due to the fee making those cruises more expensive.
Psy
The last article I just read said the cruise lines will start avoiding MX. Fine with us.If people decide to avoid cruises that stop in Mexico that will send a message.
Actually, it may not... Currently, the Mexican government earns $0 from cruise passengers as they are "in transit"... So even if cruise calls were to be cut in half, financially, Mexico is better off. Now, there is the counterargument to this that less cruise ships means less spending in port, which would have a noted impact on the more local economy, which itself, could then see calls for change... Also, at least on DCL, the Western itineraries appear to be priced slightly lower than Eastern... so it becomes more or less a case of the pricing difference going away.If people decide to avoid cruises that stop in Mexico that will send a message.
But I bet they get taxes off the money spent in port. Fewer passengers, lower taxes collected. Also there is already a $5 per person that each MX state charges so those states lose out as well.Actually, it may not... Currently, the Mexican government earns $0 from cruise passengers as they are "in transit"...
Absolutely, so there comes a point where there is more lost revenue in sales or income taxes than the new levy... but what that point is? I bet they did the calculation that they can afford to loose a few cruises...But I bet they get taxes off the money spent in port. Fewer passengers, lower taxes collected. Also there is already a $5 per person that each MX state charges so those states lose out as well.
All the articles that I saw just talked about the $42, so I didn't know about the extra $5 fee, but I do agree that the extra fee's start to add up. We will end up paying and $252 for our b2b cruises in 2026, due to the added fee.There is an extra $5 fee that is being added too. So it's $47 all together. Still a lot of $$$.
Absolutely this. It’s going to be accepted that the price is the price.I think the most fuss is going to be for cruisers who have already paid in full and now have to pay an additional amount, but let’s be honest once it’s rolled into normal cruise port fees and taxes no one will bat an eye at it anymore.
I said they could not would. These things have a way of working themselves out. I wouldn't worry about it.
I think that's the way of tourism tax, either you're not contributing at all to their economy if you don't get off the ship but still impact their area by means of it being a cruise ship (so ecological factors, port upkeeps, etc) or you're not necessarily contributing enough to the economy because you're only there for a short time vast majority of the in only less than 24 hours. Some places are enacting taxes to try and discourage visitors, Mexico in this case is not necessarily doing it for that.Seems like I should not be charged if I don’t get off. Otherwise it’s a tax for parking the ship not my personal visit to Mexico.