seaturtledude
Dancin' with the GrooGrux King
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
- Messages
- 1,566
This doesn't sound like someone I want helping to govern our neighbour country. It's absurd.

This doesn't sound like someone I want helping to govern our neighbour country. It's absurd.
True.So is Obama if you match up there history it is very even with a slight advantage to obama
He's probably been a senator for awhile..Obama didn't do very much before running for President
nra isn't bad.Clinton.
Especially considering McCain's wonderful Vice-President-to-be, Sarah Palin.
- Pro-life
- Opposes Contraception
- Opposes same-sex marriage
- Member of the National Rifle Association
- Supports Alaska Drilling
This doesn't sound like someone I want helping to govern our neighbour country. It's absurd. Anyone who would choose this person as their right-hand woman is not someone who I would vote for.
- Member of the National Rifle Association
if you hunt, and you eat what you kill, thats not cruel.if no one hunted, animals would actually be harmed. they need something in their food chain to kill them, otherwise, they would eat and breed themselves to extinction. its called thinning the herd.IMO, hunting animals for sport is cruel. also, i think it way too easy for the general public to obtain guns, and it causes more harm then good.
![]()
Think of it this way guys.
Imagine if there was a creature that was smarter than humans, was at the top of the food chain, and had every ability to go and hunt US.
How would you feel then, if they walked up to a loved-one and shot them, using the "over-population" excuse to make it ok? We are over-populated, it's a proven fact, so what's the difference? Nothing.
What is the difference between a hunter going out into a forest and shooting a bear who may have a litter of cubs waiting back at it's home and a murder breaking into someone's house and shooting everyone (including the children) dead? Nothing.
We are no better or more important than the animals so, therefore, I believe that shooting them for the pure pleasure of killing is wrong. Now, if it were a matter of survival it would be completely different, but it's not. In the U.S., there are animals bred and raised for the soul purpose of feeding the people of this country. So is there really a point of going out into the wild and killing more?
No. There's not IMHO.
Sparx said:nra isn't bad.
Disney Dork said:We are no better or more important than the animals so, therefore, I believe that shooting them for the pure pleasure of killing is wrong. Now, if it were a matter of survival it would be completely different, but it's not. In the U.S., there are animals bred and raised for the soul purpose of feeding the people of this country. So is there really a point of going out into the wild and killing more?
That's a rather harsh statement.palin is an idiot
she doesn't even know what to say when she does interviews
biden is going to eat her alive in the debate
he'll just keep interrupting and shooting her down
and she won't know what to do
That's a rather harsh statement.
I like Sarah, she's refreshing anyway. I don't understand why there is all the bad press about her. McCain picked her and BAMMM all of a sudden everyone's hating on her.
palin doesn't know what the bush doctrine is.That's a rather harsh statement.
I like Sarah, she's refreshing anyway. I don't understand why there is all the bad press about her. McCain picked her and BAMMM all of a sudden everyone's hating on her.