Barca33Runner
Please excuse the crudity of this model
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2014
I'm intrigued! I have similar issues and ran in Asics when I first started running, but they made a change that narrowed the toe box and changed the fit of the top, which triggered my Mortons neuroma.
Do you find the "sock like fit" feels tight around the lace area? And do you wear wide width? I'm curious to try the Noosa Tri now.
I know I was very enthusiastic in my post but I don’t want to give a blanket endorsement for any shoe since feet and what is comfortable for different people, even those with seemingly similar experiences with their perception of their feet, can be so non-universal.
I find the upper material to be very lightweight and forgiving without feeling like it will easily break. It’s not a flyknit, but it’s not nearly as thick or cushioned as many running shoes. I have never put a hole in any pair (although, to be fair, this has never been an issue for me with any type of shoe). They come with both regular laces and elastic laces as they are a triathlon model. I use regular when I run so I have better control of tightness and the elastic after I transition a pair to my day to day shoes. I’ve also run with the elastic and that worked fine.
I can’t do wide shoes because of my narrow heel. Although some are theoretically better in the forefoot I am always swimming in the heels and that causes the worst blisters for me. I need something that is normal to narrow in the heel and forgiving in the forefoot. Forgiving might be a better descriptor for the Noosa Tri forefoot than wide.
Cons are that the tread is relatively light so they will show wear on the bottom pretty quick. I’d say they are likely viewed as a shorter distance shoe in traditional thinking; so they may be more of a speed work or race day shoe than a training workhorse for those that vary their shoes for different purposes.