GoldenOldie said:
But you overlook the fact that you are getting more with the MYW 5 day than you were with the 5 day PHP. The MYW gives you 3 plus options instead of the old 2.
Point taken. But it still represents an upcharge. Even if I only wanted to take two trips to waterparks, I still pay $30 more per ticket out of pocket.
In many ways it's similar to gas stations eliminating 86 octane gasoline. 87 octane became the low-end standard. It's certainly a higher quality product, but you have no choice other than to pay $.05 more per gallon (on average) than 86.
GoldenOldie said:
It all depends on how you are going to use it.
Absolutely true. I never said otherwise.
But I don't think there's any question that some people, many people, will end up paying more out of pocket than they would have under the old PH / PHP pricing. The fact that the passes may contain greater value is a secondary issue. A guest who is coerced into paying $100 more for longer duration ticket than they really need means Disney is sticking those $$$ in the bank while we stick the pass in a drawer for months or years. Heck I've got a cousin who took her family to WDW 5 years ago, now have no idea when or if they will ever return, and they still have valid passes sitting at home somewhere (assuming they haven't been thrown away yet.)
tiberius said:
The best part for Disney is that they collect more parking, dining, store sales, and to some degree longer hotel stays by keeping people in the parks.
If that were true, WDW would throw the gates open for free and sit back in awe as people gobbled up the overpriced food and souvies.
Actually they tried something similar in the past. It was called FastPass. The driving force behind FastPass was NOT getting people on more attractions during the day. Paul Pressler and his cronies developed all of these fancy charts and graphs showing how much more money people would spend shopping and eating if they weren't spending time waiting in lines.
It never happened. Revenues remained flat and Disney eventually had to admit that people couldn't be convinced to spend money they didn't already intend to spend.
By all accounts, WDW attendance has fully recovered from 9/11 and then some. I find it hard to believe that WDW feels compelled to drop ticket prices to attract more guests. And, although I shouldn't rule it out altogether, it seems unlikely that they would embrace a philosophy of "slash prices in one business unit and people will just spend it elsewhere."
I don't think there's any question that people on these forums are a lot more astute than the average Disney guest. And it wouldn't surprise me to find that people here are able to save money in the short run (for example, using old Plusses and buying longer Theme Park-only passes for multiple trips). But Joe Sixpack taking his family to WDW for the first time could easily be convinced to pay for days or features that will never be used.