Does a lunchtime detention (resulting in the child not eating lunch) seem like an appropriate punishment?
At my DD's school they get lunch detention but it means you eat in the room in silence and then do work when you are done. Never heard of a school not allowing a kid to eat. What grade is it? Are you sure you have all the facts?
Does a lunchtime detention (resulting in the child not eating lunch) seem like an appropriate punishment?
This is a co-workers child. She is 15 (9th or 10th grade) and this is a private school. If you get 3 "violations" (late, incorrect uniform, etc) then you get a lunch detention. My co-worker said that she goes to a room where they just sit and do nothing. They may get 5 minutes or so after the detention to eat something before they have to run to their next class. With only 5minutes, you don't have time to chew.
This is a co-workers child. She is 15 (9th or 10th grade) and this is a private school. If you get 3 "violations" (late, incorrect uniform, etc) then you get a lunch detention. My co-worker said that she goes to a room where they just sit and do nothing. They may get 5 minutes or so after the detention to eat something before they have to run to their next class. With only 5minutes, you don't have time to chew.
Not enough information. How did it "result in a child not eating lunch"?
does a lunchtime detention (resulting in the child not eating lunch) seem like an appropriate punishment?
This is a co-workers child. She is 15 (9th or 10th grade) and this is a private school. If you get 3 "violations" (late, incorrect uniform, etc) then you get a lunch detention. My co-worker said that she goes to a room where they just sit and do nothing. They may get 5 minutes or so after the detention to eat something before they have to run to their next class. With only 5 minutes, you don't have time to chew.
I suspect your co-worker doesn't have all the details correct because it doesn't sound right or like anything I've encountered.