FLmomof2
Keep Moving Forward
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2006
- Messages
- 767
Not sure I understand the rationale behind this. Guests check out, guests check in. Bell service is provided as an amenity with tips optional. How is a split stay any different from a guest checking out/in?
Really? So is that on top of the tip to have them pick up from the room? Taxi is looking better and better and immediate access to luggage at new resort.
They keep pricing themselves out...
Someone has to move the luggage from one resort to another. Checking in/out only involves moves internally within one resort.
I don't think it is. Someone is already paying for it, for DVC resorts it's likely spread across all the membership indirectly. Even if it comes out of DVCMC funds, it's still indirectly paid by the membership.Your point is well taken: Theoretically any resort might have to make a delivery to each of the other resorts every day. When you factor in human resources, gas, vehicle maintenance, etc. I guess $25 isn't too bad.
I would assume those involved are not just tipped and would get compensation in addition OR the tips would be sufficient for them to justify doing the job even after the change. The reality is this approach will likely reduce the tips a little to a modest amount but not dramatically so (I guess it depends on whether you're the one getting less as to what dramatic is). I'd think they'd take this into consideration as part of the evaluation process as they look at this change going forward if it happens and it really should.Maybe a fee will discourage split stays. That's a win for Disney. Longer stays at the same resort mean less activity at the front desks as well as less housekeeping.
If they do institute a fee, I would hope that at least a portion of it would go to the staff performing the service.
If it discourages split stays, esp short or fragmented ones, I see that as a win for Disney, DVC and the membership as a whole.
I just saw on another thread the Bell Service is charging $25 to transfer luggage during split stays.
I was wondering if this applies to DVC members also? We are staying 1 night BWV, 4 BLT, and 4 BCV, and trying to figure out the best way to transfer the luggage.
Thanks in advance.
Obviously there are a number of factors and some of the issues that we have little to no real info about. I would agree that the nature of a points system set up as Disney does has a small amount of waste due to the nature of fitting the puzzle together, I don't think they have much of an issue of orphaned days simply due to this issue. Since they don't link reservations to actual villas up front and thus have the flexibility to match them to minimize usage, I doubt it's very much. So I don't see this part as an issue personally.I agree there are some advantages if the number of short, fragmented stays were reduced. However, there are probably as many disadvantages if there is a significant decline in split stays.
By its very nature of primarily being a points system, DVC probably has lots of orphaned nights of 1-3 days in length that are scattered throughout the year at every resort. Isn't it better to have these nights occupied by members doing split stays rather than having them go vacant?
Disney benefits the longer guests stay on property. If a split stay lets a family extend a stay from 5 to 7 days, Disney stands to benefit from increased Park attendance, more food sales, more souvenir sales, etc.
DVD benefits from members who buy small 25 or 50 point add-on deeds so they can do a short split stay at a new DVC resort. If split stays are discouraged, would members be less willing to buy a few more points at a different home resort?
.....(snip).......The one thing Marriott does, which I really like but suspect most people here won't, is they require you to have and commit the points for a wait list.
Correct.So you couldn't book a reservation and then waitlist for what you prefer unless you actually had enough points for both reservations?