S
susy
Guest
As a masters research student, the first very obvious thing that jumps out is that 80% thing. Of course you hav a high rate of complaints from people who are constantly there as opposed to day visitors.DUH!!!!!
Zip-a-dee-dude-da said:Thats Great dont take offense....Its statistics pure and simple.
CAr Insurance is cheaper for those with higher education......does that mean PHD never get in accidents.....No it means statistically they get in few than the norm. Its a numbers game. Nothing personal
Zip-a-dee-dude-da said:Oh, I think you have the wrong person. I'm not defending them (I'm the one who said if they don't give me the perks I want, I'll stay off site and make less trips, and I had no problem reporting it right here, when my daughter's room was robbed while we were there.). But I can't say they are thinning out the herd. Not as long as they are still offering all the perks (they take some away and they offer others, like DDE..that was a real plus). They are giving to us a little different, and in a way that makes my last minute trips harder (assuming they will not be offering the "usual" perks via phone). But I don't know that yet, do I? I don't know that they won't still be offering some discounts, because I'm not at the time where they would ordinarily offer them. And why all caps? I don't have to be screamed at, just because I don't agree with the "thinning".DMRick said:I still see nothing that tells me Disney wants less AP holders coming.
QUOTE]
OH MY GOODNESS.............THEY ARE MESSING WITHTHE AP HOLDERS #1 PERK, WHY ??????????? BECAUSE THEY WANT LESS AP HOLDERS. THIS WHOLE PROGRAM IS TO "Thin out the Herd". THEY WOULD INCREASE BENEFITS IF THEY WANTED MORE AP HOLDERS>
Some people just dont get it. If Disney charged a 10 srcharge for indoor plumbing i swear some people would defend them!!!
Brian Noble said:It's not just total money---that's only revenue. There are also costs. If two guests each spend the same amount of money, but one guest visits the parks twice as often (and stays in the hotels twice as many nights) then that guest represents less profit. Granted, the fixed costs of the theme parks dominate per-capita costs. This is true to a lesser extent at the resorts. But, each marginal guest does add *some* cost to the operation. So, if a guest that switches from an AP to day tickets spends, say 20% less in total in a year, but visits for 1/3 fewer days, that might represent more profit for the company.
CharlesTD said:DMR this is the type of thing I am guessing Disney is looking for those that have the AP for certain perks such as room discounts because if those that are looking for the discounts start to stay offsite then it opnes more rooms for rack rate paying customers and by my recolection this is worth more to them than an APer in a room.
By DeanMrick:You're kidding, right? If I stay on site, I'm eating on site, I'm spending on site, and my value is a lot more than a room discount (and we often bring others, who also spend). For your logic to be right, all rooms would have to be filled. And they aren't. If they were, you would see the other side of POP being built (that will really tell me when things are booming, since they need 80% of rooms filled in the values, before they continue that), as well as new resorts. Remember, we may call and not be able ot get an AP room, but it's seldom we aren't able to get a rack rate room (Christmas, Thanksgiving, Easter)..so they aren't filling up yet. Disney is doing better, but judging by the marketing, they aren't totally out of the woods yet. Full rooms is what hotels want, even if some are at discount (and by offering me an incentive to stay on site, my AP is worth more to them, than just free admittance. If I'm staying off site, I'm spending much less at Disney. Heck, when we stay off site, we are even less likely to do tours, and buy souvenirs, as well as the before mentioned eating). But in any case, I got my phone call this morning (about 5 minutes ago). This best rates is supposed to be in addition to the regular AP discounts. The gal who called me, said they hoped to save APer's time and phone calls, by making sure their valued guests got the best rate, without having to go to the trouble of continuing to monitor. So we'll see.
2005 - Holiday Inn, Disney Village ($1.13 per night!!)
cobbler said:I got a phone call yesterday too. From the Executive Vice President of something. I honestly am drawing a blank at what and what his name even was. He called regarding my email about the new program and I told him that now I understand it was in addition to the current things. He said yes that is true, its an addition not a replacement and glad I understood.
I was really taken aback at the phone call from someone so high up that I totally forgot to express a few of my other concerns (I.E rolling it out on a Friday afternoon with no trained staff to answer questions and also no email notification about this new program at all). He asked where I was learning my information, was it from the internet and where. I did tell him just the passholder website. He said good because something about only people he has talked to and how is the info getting out or something. I really couldn't follow what he was saying. Of course this too could be because I was kind of shocked I got a real phone call and from someone important as well.
He did say if I had any other concerns just to let them know.
Interesting phone call to say the least.
But the costs aren't all fixed; there are marginal costs per guest---more guests in the park means more cash registers need to be staffed, more ride vehicles on-line (and CMs to operate them), more food locations open for longer hours, etc. etc. Add to that the diminishing returns of an AP guest: the more they visit, the less they contribute to the per-capita revenue each day. The same is true of the day guest, thanks to the new MYW structure, but the downside is limited---you can't get a single MYW ticket that lasts more than 10 days.Economies of scale means that the more revenue coming in lowers the total percentage cost per guest per day.
DisFlan said:Zip-a-dee-dude-da - If we could get $1.13 at HI every night, we'd be there all winter! Man, what a deal. I sorta think Disney can't compete with that one.![]()
DisFlan
But the costs aren't all fixed; there are marginal costs per guest---more guests in the park means more cash registers need to be staffed, more ride vehicles on-line (and CMs to operate them), more food locations open for longer hours, etc. etc. Add to that the diminishing returns of an AP guest: the more they visit, the less they contribute to the per-capita revenue each day. The same is true of the day guest, thanks to the new MYW structure, but the downside is limited---you can't get a single MYW ticket that lasts more than 10 days.
Brian Noble said:But the costs aren't all fixed
there are marginal costs per guest---more guests in the park means more cash registers need to be staffed, more ride vehicles on-line (and CMs to operate them), more food locations open for longer hours, etc. etc.
Add to that the diminishing returns of an AP guest: the more they visit, the less they contribute to the per-capita revenue each day. The same is true of the day guest, thanks to the new MYW structure, but the downside is limited---you can't get a single MYW ticket that lasts more than 10 days.
So, it is certainly possible that AP guests are not as profitable as day guests, even if they spend more total money---it all depends on how many visits that money is spread across.
Sammie said:Just curious when he asked where you were getting information why did you not mention the DIS??
Not that it matters, as you just let them know you get info here too.![]()