Little Fockers

Here's my 2 cents...
Remotely amusing but not as good as the first two (just as crude in parts, though)
Sexual innuendos aside, I just think they've run out of funny Focker ideas. I'm Fockered out.
 
I really have little opinion on the movie - the kids will probably Netflix it when it is available.

But I don't understand why you would think ED is worthy of an R rating. Erectile Dysfunction is all over Prime Time network TV with the commercials and stuff. It clearly isn't censored in our society.

yeah, but they should be. I think those ED commercials are right up there with Feminine Protection commercials.We all know about them, but do we need to have it up in our faces during prime time? :confused3 Ick!
 
yeah, but they should be. I think those ED commercials are right up there with Feminine Protection commercials.We all know about them, but do we need to have it up in our faces during prime time? :confused3 Ick!

Well that *IS* what the pills are for. ;)
 
But THEY are minors and YOU are the parent.

A simple, "You know what guys, I'm not sure this is the best choice for a movie. Let's see something else today & wait until this one comes out on video."

If they balk then my response would be, "Yeah, but I'm paying, so we're not seeing that movie today. Let choose a different one."

This.

I've read through the entire thread, and I'm still confused as to how the OP doesn't think it's appropriate as a parent, to preview or read reviews of a movie before taking underage children? The other thing is, that since this is the 3rd installment, you are pretty certain that it will be the same or worse than the 1st and 2nd movies. There are many inappropriate parts, as already mentioned, in both of those movies.

We don't really watch any TV, but I'm curious as to what previews the OP saw during family programming? What show was OP watching? We saw a preview of the movie the other day, when hubby was setting the PVR for the kids the next day, and it was after 10:00 pm, and based on that, I wouldn't take 11 year olds for sure.

It's always interesting to me to read these kinds of threads...with the Internet, you can basically get the entire synopsis of a movie, so there is no excuse for not knowing what you are getting into before you pay for the movie. This is called good parenting...

Tiger
 

yeah, but they should be. I think those ED commercials are right up there with Feminine Protection commercials.We all know about them, but do we need to have it up in our faces during prime time? :confused3 Ick!

Oh I totally agree with you there.

But still, everything about this movie franchise - right down to the "Focker" name is based on that sort of humor. I have to agree with the others that I don't understand how you can get in there and then act shocked with the content.

I haven't read the reviews or even seen the first two movies but ED jokes and other crude baseline humor things like that is exactly what I'd expect.
 
Post holiday stress disorder ?- people are really snapping on the boards lately. The advertising of the movie has been directed at and to the younger set. The ads are during the shows of the younger viewers, and the previews I have seen do not look as raunchy as it is. Frankly, the entire Fauker situation lost its funny 1/2 way during the first movie. I mean really how many jokes can one make about an unfortunate name? 2 was too many imho. But, the two boys wanted to see the movie. Had you watched Meet the Parents on television it was watered down so much and the outright vulgar jokes were removed, the stupid off colored ones stayed, but without them you have a pretty pathetic movie. I have a really funny story to tell, but I think I will wait until the PHSD fades away.
 
Well i'm only 14, and even I didn't get some of the humor.
The first time I saw Meet The Parents, I was 11, and I thought it was hilarious.
I saw Meet The Fockers when I was 11 or 12, and I saw Little Fockers yesterday, and i've loved all of them!
Surely if you've seen the others, you would have expected some crude humour? I mean, me and my friend were a bit surprised at how much there was in there, but we were able to handle it and see the funny side.
 
Well i'm only 14, and even I didn't get some of the humor.
The first time I saw Meet The Parents, I was 11, and I thought it was hilarious.
I saw Meet The Fockers when I was 11 or 12, and I saw Little Fockers yesterday, and i've loved all of them!
Surely if you've seen the others, you would have expected some crude humour? I mean, me and my friend were a bit surprised at how much there was in there, but we were able to handle it and see the funny side.

I don't know about the op but when its either all or mostly crude humour it just get so boring. Watch someone like George Carlin yes he swore and yes at times he was crude but it wasn't all the time. In the UK we have a comic called Jasper Carrott who is funny without swearing or being crude.
 
fourteen is not 11... ;)

And, people do have different senses of humor.
It sounds like this movie might not appeal to me after all...
I don't want to sit thru two hours of cheap crude shots to see a couple of truly valid humorous things.

Anyhow, many people here are right.
1. Anymore, PG-13 is simply 'R' with frontal nudity cut out.
2. ( And, this is the one that really gets me... )
Many movies are being promoted in a very disingenuous way, and attempt to appeal to younger audiences... I mean, C'mon, when my son see's the trailers for Inglorious Basterds and thinks he really wants to see it... like it's a comedy.... :sad2:

Too bad 'Truth in Advertising' doesn't seem to apply to movies.
 
THEY(the kids) asked to see the movie. It was marketed heavily during other PG movies and during FAMILY television programming.

Ultimately, disregard the 11-year old (12 in two weeks) factor. I would have walked out with or without them.

And you couldn't say no? :laughing:

Or read the reviews first? That's what they are there for.

This one's on you and I'm disappointed to hear the theater gave you an "upgrade". :sad2:
 
I don't know about the op but when its either all or mostly crude humour it just get so boring. Watch someone like George Carlin yes he swore and yes at times he was crude but it wasn't all the time. In the UK we have a comic called Jasper Carrott who is funny without swearing or being crude.

Oh, I'm from the UK too :laughing: I live just outside Greater London, in Essex (:

It's only been very recently since i've started finding things like swearing funny, although only when they're in the correct situations.
I must admit, at times, it was a bit uncomfortable or boring, but overall, I enjoyed it.
 
Jeez Louise!! The OP took ehr kids to a movie that once she got there she realized was inappropiate so she left. Not the end of the world but the way some posters are attacking her you would think she called for the actors to be tarred and feathered. I for one, am glad that the OP posted because my dd is going to the movies tomorrow and now I know that The Fockers is a no go.
 
Jeez Louise!! The OP took ehr kids to a movie that once she got there she realized was inappropiate so she left. Not the end of the world but the way some posters are attacking her you would think she called for the actors to be tarred and feathered. I for one, am glad that the OP posted because my dd is going to the movies tomorrow and now I know that The Fockers is a no go.

I don't see how anyone "attacked" the OP at all. That terminology is so overrused here on the DISboards.

What most of us are saying, is that it's 2011, and so you can pretty much find anything on the Internet, including movie clips, reviews and a myriad of blogs discussing scene by scene analysis of every movie currently showing at the theatre.

That info is there to be had for all...to blame or get irritated at the movie company or producers because one took underage kids to a movie, is totally not realistic, especially since this movie is 3rd in a series. Prior knowledge is all there...Not understanding movie ratings, ignoring movie reviews, or, not understanding how to assess popular media, is dropping the ball as a parent, IMHO; therefore, you take whatever comes your way. Although based on the first few minutes, this one sounds really disgusting. Although funny to some, it's not appropriate for 11 year olds to see, IMHO.

In the grand scheme of things it may not be a big deal, but it seems like it was to the OP, as she had to walk out, so again, I'm confused as to how any parent would take their underage kids to a movie that they had not seen, nor read anything about? Basing this decision on TV clips or movie posters is ridiculous, as the media's job is to manipulate people in order to procure sales. It's up to us to see through that and make an informed decision using the multitude of info that is available for this sort of situation.

It was great that she came on here to warn others, but her subsequent posts, are telling in that she doesn't seem to have taken any responsible for what happened. She didn't take advantage of the info that's out there on the movie, and in turn, she had to face embarassment at the hands of her kids, and the inconvenience of switching theatres.

As far as the Post Holiday Stress Disorder label, I don't think that's appropriate for us who are pointing out that this situation could have been easily avoided by spending a few minutes on the Internet.

This thread is so interesting to me as both an English teacher and parent, as I teach media studies as part of my classes, plus, as a parent, I don't let my children view or listen to anything, unless my husband or myself have viewed/listened to it first, period. My colleagues, who are the Media teachers at our school, would be very interested in reading some of the responses on here...There is absolutely no truth in most advertising...

Tiger
 
The first Meet the Parents was cute, the second one was stupid, and until the 3rd comes out on cable, I'm not going to see it. Sometimes people don't know when to stop with a good thing.
OP, you stated your feelings and you're not alone. The reviews for Little Fockers have been terrible.
 
I have not seen the movie or even the previews for the movie. But I have seen the first movie and based on that I would not even take my 13 yr old to see it, much less a younger child.
 
fourteen is not 11... ;)

And, people do have different senses of humor.
It sounds like this movie might not appeal to me after all...
I don't want to sit thru two hours of cheap crude shots to see a couple of truly valid humorous things.

Anyhow, many people here are right.
1. Anymore, PG-13 is simply 'R' with frontal nudity cut out.
2. ( And, this is the one that really gets me... )
Many movies are being promoted in a very disingenuous way, and attempt to appeal to younger audiences... I mean, C'mon, when my son see's the trailers for Inglorious Basterds and thinks he really wants to see it... like it's a comedy.... :sad2:

Too bad 'Truth in Advertising' doesn't seem to apply to movies.

It's been this way for a long time though. Weren't there Transformers happy meal toys when Transformers was in theatres? Uh, Transformers was rated Pg-13 or R. Certainly not a CHILDREN'S movie. I am sure there were others but that was the first that came to mind.

I agree with the others, the Focker movies are really crude, especially the second one. Dang. I am looking forward to the 3rd but my 11 year old won't be seeing it. I'd rather he see mild violence then the Focker humor. I find it to silly, but not child appropriate. The OP made a bad decision in choosing that movie for the family, it's not the film's fault. Obviously some find that type of movie entertaining!

Speaking of odd movies..google The Human Centipede..talk about a freaky movie...uh..some people like that type of thing so we shouldn't rain on those who like it, just choose something else if you don't!
 
I don't even want my 16yr old seeing this and luckily he doesn't want to. Ratings are there for a reason. But I am curious as to how the OP kids reacted to having to leave the movie? Were they enjoying it and you made them leave or did they want to leave as well?
 
We have seen The Fighter, True Grit, and Little Fockers this week. I was seriously tempted to walk out of the Fockers. It was horrible. For the person who mentioned The Town, I would rather my kid see that than the Fockers. The first 5 minutes WERE disgusting and should not have been rated PG-13. It is two of the characters ramming a guys anus with a medical enema and them getting aroused from it. Then, they do double talk for their sexual excitement while the girl squirms and moan-talks. PG-13 is that anyone under 13 needs a parent. Sorry, I do not think this appropriate for many audiences. It was gross, crude and FAR worse than anything in the other movies. It was a terrible waste of money and talent. I would take my kids to see many movies including The Hangover (other than those last picture shots) before I would want them to witness the anal probing and disgusting turn-on that it turned into. I am not a big censor girl, but this one did need to be rated higher. Sorry some people jumped all over you OP.... I stayed for the whole movie and it was just terrible. Not really funny at all. Liked the first two though.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer

New Posts







DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom